Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Past studies have emphasized members’ personality as an important predictor of departure from organizations, but the measurement of this factor has mostly relied on self-judged personality. As alternatives to self-judged personality, our study examines how two unobtrusive measures—others-judged personality and computerized text analytic results through Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2015 (Pennebaker et al., 2015)—are related to members’ departure from organizations (N = 49). Drawing from internal personnel evaluations (i.e., others-judged personality), text (i.e., self-introduction documents that applicants submitted when applying to the organization), and behavioral data (i.e., actual stay in the organization), this study indicates that unobtrusive measures significantly predict members’ length of stay and that simultaneous use of both measures better predicts members’ length of stay in the organization than either one separately. However, text analytic results through Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2015 predict members’ departure more robustly. This study expands the theoretical meaning of personality and provides practical ways to predict people’s organizational behaviors.

Keywords

departure from organizations organizational turnover unobtrusive measure computerized text analysis others-judged personality Big Five personality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boyd

R. L.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2017). Language-based personality: A new approach to personality in a digital world. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18, 63-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.017

Cameron

A. C.

Trivedi

P. K.

(2013). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge University Press.

Choi

I. S.

Colbert

A. E.

(2015). Understanding organizational commitment: A meta-analytic examination of the roles of the five-factor model of personality and culture. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1542-1567. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000014

Chung

C. K.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2008). Revealing dimensions of thinking in open-ended self-descriptions: An automated meaning extraction method for natural language. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(1), 96-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.04.006

Connelly

B. S.

Ones

D. S.

(2010). Another perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1092-1122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021212

Credé

Harms

Niehorster

Gaye-Valentine

(2012). An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 874-888. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027403

Dess

G. G.

Shaw

J. D.

(2001). Voluntary turnover, social capital, and organizational performance. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 446-456. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4845830

Fast

L. A.

Funder

D. C.

(2008). Personality as manifest in word use: Correlations with self-report, acquaintance report, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 334-346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.334

Felps

Mitchell

T. R.

Hekman

D. R.

Lee

T. W.

Holtom

B. C.

Harman

W. S.

(2009). Turnover contagion: How coworkers’ job embeddedness and job search behaviors influence quitting. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 545-561. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.41331075

10.

Frumkin

(2002). On being nonprofit: A conceptual and policy primer. Harvard University Press.

11.

Gonçalves

Araújo

Benevenuto

Cha

(2013, October). Comparing and combining sentiment analysis methods. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on online social networks (pp. 27-38). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2512938.2512951

12.

Gosling

S. D.

Rentfrow

P. J.

Swann

W. B.

Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1

13.

Gottschalk

L. A.

(1997). The unobtrusive measurement of psychological states and traits. In Roberts

C. W.

(Ed.), Text analysis for the social sciences: Methods for drawing statistical inferences from texts and transcripts (pp. 117-129). Lawrence Erlbaum.

14.

Hall

Caton

(2017). Am I who I say I am? Unobtrusive self-representation and personality recognition on Facebook. PLOS ONE, 12(9), e0184417. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184417

15.

Holtom

B. C.

Mitchell

T. R.

Lee

T. W.

Eberly

M. B.

(2008). Turnover and retention research: A glance at the past, a closer review of the present, and a venture into the future. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 231-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211552

16.

Jordan

K. N.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2017). The exception or the rule: Using words to assess analytic thinking, Donald Trump, and the American presidency. Transnational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(3), 312-316. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000125

17.

Judge

T. A.

Heller

Mount

M. K.

(2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530-541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.530

18.

Kacewicz

Pennebaker

J. W.

Davis

Jeon

Graesser

A. C.

(2013). Pronoun use reflects standings in social hierarchies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(2), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X1350265

19.

Kobayashi

V. B.

Mol

S. T.

Berkers

H. A.

Kismihók

Den Hartog

D. N.

(2018). Text mining in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 21(3), 733-765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117722619

20.

Long

J. S.

(1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage.

21.

Meyer

J. P.

Stanley

D. J.

Herscovitch

Topolnytsky

(2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20-52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842

22.

Moore

Lee

S. Y.

Kim

Cable

D. M.

(2017). The advantage of being oneself: The role of applicant self-verification in organizational hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(11), 1493-1513. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000223

23.

Naim

Tanveer

M. I.

Gildea

Hoque

M. E.

(2015). Automated prediction and analysis of job interview performance: The role of what you say and how you say it. In 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG), 1(1), 1-6. https://.doi.org/10.1109/FG.2015.7163127

24.

Newman

M. L.

Pennebaker

J. W.

Berry

D. S.

Richards

J. M.

(2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), 665-675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029005010

25.

Pennebaker

J. W.

Boyd

R. L.

Jordan

Blackburn

(2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. University of Texas at Austin.

26.

Pennebaker

J. W.

Chung

C. K.

Frazee

Lavergne

G. M.

Beaver

D. I.

(2014). When small words foretell academic success: The case of college admissions essays. PLOS ONE, 9(12), e115844. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115844

27.

Pennebaker

J. W.

King

L. A.

(1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1296-1312. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296

28.

Robinson

R. L.

Navea

Ickes

(2013). Predicting final course performance from students’ written self-introductions: An LIWC analysis. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32(4), 469-479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X13476869

29.

Rubenstein

A. L.

Eberly

M. B.

Lee

T. W.

Mitchell

T. R.

(2018). Surveying the forest: A meta-analysis, moderator investigation, and future-oriented discussion of the antecedents of voluntary employee turnover. Personnel Psychology, 71(1), 23-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12226

30.

Saucier

(1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3), 506-516. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8

31.

Schlenker

B. R.

Chambers

J. R.

B. M.

(2012). Conservatives are happier than liberals, but why? Political ideology, personality, and life satisfaction. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(2), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.009

32.

Schwartz

H. A.

Eichstaedt

J. C.

Kern

M. L.

Dziurzynski

Ramones

S. M.

Agrawal

Shah

Kosinski

Stillwell

Martin

E. P.

Seligman

M. E. P

Ungar

L. H.

(2013). Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: The open-vocabulary approach. PLOS ONE, 8(9), e73791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073791

33.

Shumate

Atouba

Cooper

K. R.

Pilny

(2014). Two paths diverged: Examining the antecedents to social entrepreneurship. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(3), 404-421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318914538561

34.

Tett

R. P.

Hundley

N. A.

Christiansen

N. D.

(2017). Meta-analysis and the myth of generalizability. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 10(3), 421-456. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2017.26

35.

Thalmeyer

A. G.

Saucier

Eigenhuis

(2011). Comparative validity of brief and medium-length Big Five and Big Six personality questionnaires. Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 995-1009. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024165

36.

Watson

Hubbard

Wiese

(2000). Self–other agreement in personality and affectivity: The role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3), 546-558. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.3.546

37.

Yarkoni

(2010). Personality in 100,000 words: A large-scale analysis of personality and word use among bloggers. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(3), 363-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.04.001

38.

Yee

T. W.

(2010). VGAM: Vector generalized linear and additive models (Version 1.1-2). [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=VGAM

39.

Zeldow

P. B.

McAdams

D. P.

(1993). On the comparison of TAT and free speech techniques in personality assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 60(1), 181-185. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6001_14

Word Use as an Unobtrusive Predictor of Early Departure From Organizations

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References