As immigration and mobility increases, so do interactions between people from different linguistic backgrounds. Yet while linguistic diversity offers many benefits, it also comes with a number of challenges. In seven empirical articles and one commentary, this Special Issue addresses some of the most significant language challenges facing researchers in the 21st century: the power language has to form and perpetuate stereotypes, the contribution language makes to intersectional identities, and the role of language in shaping intergroup relations. By presenting work that aims to shed light on some of these issues, the goal of this Special Issue is to (a) highlight language as integral to social processes and (b) inspire researchers to address the challenges we face. To keep pace with the world’s constantly evolving linguistic landscape, it is essential that we make progress toward harnessing language’s power in ways that benefit 21st century globalized societies.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
2.
ApfelbaumE. P.PhillipsK. W.RichesonJ. A. (2014). Rethinking the baseline in diversity research: Should we be explaining the effects of homogeneity?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 235-244. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614527466
3.
BarretoM.EllemersN. (2015). Detecting and experiencing prejudice: New answers to old questions. In OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 139-219). Academic Press.
BickesH.OttenT.WeymannL. C. (2014). The financial crisis in the German and English press: Metaphorical structures in the media coverage on Greece, Spain and Italy. Discourse & Society, 25(4), 424-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514536956
6.
BirneyM. E.RabinovichA.MortonT. A. (2020). Where are you from? An investigation into the intersectionality of accent strength and nationality status on perceptions of nonnative speakers in Britain. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(4), 495-515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20932628
7.
BlockD.CoronaV. (2016). Intersectionality in language and identity research. In PreeceS. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and identity (pp. 533-548). Routledge.
8.
BruckmüllerS.AbeleA. E. (2010). Comparison focus in intergroup comparisons: Who we compare to whom influences who we see as powerful and agentic. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(10), 1424-1435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210383581
9.
BruckmüllerS.BraunM. (2020). One group’s advantage or another group’s disadvantage? How comparative framing shapes explanations of, and reactions to, workplace gender inequality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(4), 457-475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20932631
10.
BurgersC.BeukeboomC. J. (2020). How language contributes to stereotype formation: Combined effects of label types and negation use in behavior descriptions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(4), 438-456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20933320
11.
CarnaghiA.MaassA.GrestaS.BianchiM.CadinuM.ArcuriL. (2008). Nomina sunt omina: On the inductive potential of nouns and adjectives in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 839-859. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.839
12.
CrystalD. (2010). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
13.
DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M. (2006). When what you say about others says something about you: Language abstraction and inferences about describers’ attitudes and goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(4), 500-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.06.001
14.
DragojevicM.GilesH. (2014). Language and interpersonal communication: Their intergroup dynamics. In BergerC. R. (Ed.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 29-51). De Gruyter Mouton.
15.
EchterhoffG.HigginsE. T.KopietzR.GrollS. (2005). Audience-effects on memory: The role of shared reality. Journal of Personality and Social Personality, 89(3), 257-276. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.257
16.
FiedlerK. (2007). Social communication. Psychology Press.
17.
FormanowiczM.SuitnerC. (2020). Sounding strange(r): Origins, consequences, and boundary conditions of sociophonetic discrimination. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19884354
18.
FreemanJ. B.AmbadyN. (2011). A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychological Review, 118(2), 247-279. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022327
19.
GilesH.JohnsonP. (1987). Ethnolinguistic identity theory: A social psychological approach to language maintenance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 68, 69-100. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1987.68.69
20.
GilesH.MarlowM. L. (2011). Theorizing language attitudes existing frameworks, an integrative model, and new directions. Annals of the International Communication Association, 35(1), 161-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2011.11679116
21.
GilesH.RakićT. (2014). Language attitudes: The social determinants and consequences of language variation. In HoltgravesT. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 11-26). Oxford University Press.
22.
GluszekA.DovidioJ. F. (2010). The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of nonnative accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 214-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309359288
23.
GluszekA.HansenK. (2013). Language attitudes in the Americas. In GilesH.WatsonB. (Eds.), The social meanings of language, dialect, and accent: An international perspective (pp. 26-44). Peter Lang.
24.
GorterD. (2006). Linguistic landscape: A new approach to multilingualism. Multilingual Matters Ltd.
25.
HansenK.RakićT.SteffensM. C. (2014). When actions speak louder than words: Preventing discrimination of nonstandard speakers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(1), 68-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X13499761
26.
HansenK.RakićT.SteffensM. C. (2017). Competent and warm? How mismatching appearance and accent influence first impressions. Experimental Psychology, 64(1), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000348
27.
HigginsE. TRholesW. S.JonesC. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(2), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(77)80007-3
28.
JelićM.UzelacE.BiruškiD. C. (2020). Intergroup threat as a mediator of ethnic identification and intergroup orientations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(4), 534-550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20932632
29.
KinzlerK. D.ShuttsK.DeJesusJ.SpelkeE. S. (2009). Accent trumps race in guiding children’s social preferences. Social Cognition, 27(4), 623-634. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.623
30.
KlarY.Mar’iA. A.HalabiS.BashirA.BashirB. (2020). Reactions of Arab-Palestinians in Israel towards an in-group member mixing Hebrew or English with Arabic. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(4), 516-533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20933657
31.
LandryR.BourhisR. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970161002
32.
LevonE. (2015). Integrating intersectionality in language, gender, and sexuality research. Language & Linguistics Compass, 9(7), 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12147
33.
LitanR.NyeJ. S.Jr.FriedmanB. M.LutwakE. N.NealerK. G.ÅslundA.BernsteinJ.PennerR. G.SerfatyS.RièsP.MayerT.MahbubaniK.El-ErianM. A.Ørstrøm MøllerJ.BakerD.FauxJ.ManningR. A.HubbardG.GalbraithJ. K.. . . SchmiedingH. (2019). Symposium: Why is populism on the rise and what do the populists want?International Political Economy, 33(1), 11-35. http://www.international-economy.com/TIE_W19_PopulismSymp.pdf
34.
MaassA.ArcuriL.SuitnerC. (2014). Shaping intergroup relations through language. In HoltgravesT. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 157-176). Oxford University Press.
35.
McCormick-HuhnK.WarnerL. R.SettlesI. H.ShieldsS. A. (2019). What if psychology took intersectionality seriously? Changing how psychologists think about participants. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(4), 445-456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319866430
36.
Muñiz-VelázquezJ. A.PulidoC. M. (2019). The Routledge handbook of positive communication. Routledge.
37.
MurataK. (2016). ELF research: Its impact on language education in Japan and East Asia. In PitzlM.-L.RuthO.-T. (Eds.), English as a lingua franca: Perspectives and prospects: Contributions in honour of Barbara Seidlhofer (pp. 77-86). De Gruyter.
38.
NesdaleD.RooneyR. (1996). Evaluations and stereotyping of accented speakers by pre-adolescent children. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(2), 133-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X960152002
39.
PittsM. J. (2019). The language and social psychology of savoring: Advancing the communication savoring model. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(2), 237-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X18821404
40.
PittsM. J. (2020) Epilogue: The language opportunities for the XXI century. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(4), 567-574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20933997
41.
RakićT.SteffensM. C.MummendeyA. (2011). Blinded by the accent! The minor role of looks in ethnic categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021522
42.
RakićT.SteffensM. C.SazegarA. (2020). Do people remember what is prototypical? The role of accent-religion intersectionality for individual and category memory. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(4), 476-494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20933330
43.
RosenmannA.ReeseG.CameronJ. E. (2016). Social identities in a globalized world: Challenges and opportunities for collective action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(2), 202-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615621272
SkrodzkaM.HansenK.OlkaJ.BilewiczM. (2020). The twofold role of a minority language in historical trauma: The case of Lemko minority in Poland. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(4), 551-566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20932629
46.
SochaT.PittsM. J. (Eds.). (2012). The positive side of interpersonal communication. Peter Lang.
47.
SoralW.BilewiczM.WiniewskiM. (2017). Exposure to hate speech increases prejudice through desensitization. Aggressive Behavior, 44(2), 136-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21737
48.
TaylorD. M.BassiliJ. N.AboudF. E. (1973). Dimensions of ethnic identity: An example from Quebec. Journal of Social Psychology, 89(2), 185-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1973.9922590
Ting-ToomeyS.DorjeeT. (2014). Language, identity, and culture: Multiple identity-based perspectives. In HoltgravesT. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 27-45). Oxford University Press.
