This study examines how language used by advice recipients and whether the peer apologized before offering advice affected advice outcomes. Participants wrote about a problem and then shared the problem through online chat with a peer (who was actually an experimental confederate). Although the participant was expecting the peer to share a problem as well and stated they did not want advice, the peer gave advice. Use of future tense verbs by the recipient in problem descriptions reduced implementation intention, perceived efficacy of advice, perceived approbation of advice, and perception of advice as confirming. This supports research that planning, operationalized through use of future tense verbs, reduces receptiveness to advice. Participants who used more I and we pronouns had lower intentions to implement advice. Contrary to hypotheses, use of apologies by the advisor for giving unwanted advice did not affect implementation intentions and increased reported negative emotions.
BergerC. (1997). Planning strategic interaction: Attaining goals through communicative action. Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
BergerC. (2015). Planning theory of communication: Goal attainment through communicative action. In BraithwaiteD. O.SchrodtP. (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (pp. 89-102). Sage.
3.
BrownP.LevinsonS. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge University Press.
4.
Chentsova-DuttonY. E.VaughnA. (2011). Let me tell you what to do: Cultural differences in advice-giving. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(5), 687-703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111402343
5.
CollinsS. E.ChawlaN.HsuS. H.GrowJ.OttoJ. M.MarlattG. A. (2009). Language-based measures of mindfulness: Initial validity and clinical utility. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors: Journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 23(4), 743-749. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017579
6.
De CremerD.Van DijkE.PillutlaM. (2010). Explaining unfair offers in ultimatum games and their effects on trust: An experimental approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(1), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20102018
7.
DeelstraJ. T.PeetersM. C.SchaufeliW. B.StroebeW.ZijlstraF. R.van DoornenL. P. (2003). Receiving instrumental support at work: When help is not welcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 324-331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.324
8.
DuanJ.ZhouX.Van SwolL. M. (forthcoming). The psychological structure of self-focus and other-focus and their relationship with advice utilization: A nomological network perspective [Manuscript in preparation].
9.
FalkensteinA.TranB.LudiD.MolkaraA.NguyenH.TabuencaA.SweenyK. (2016). Characteristics and correlates of word use in physician-patient communication. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 50(5), 664-677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9792-x
10.
FengB.BurlesonB. R. (2008). The Effects of Argument Explicitness on Responses to Advice in Supportive Interactions. Communication Research, 35, 849–874. http://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208324274
11.
FengB.MacGeorgeE. L. (2010). The influences of message and source factors on advice outcomes. Communication Research, 37(4), 576-598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210368258
12.
FengB.MagenE. (2015). Relationship closeness predicts unsolicited advice giving in supportive interactions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(6), 751-767. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515592262
13.
GoeiR.RobertoA.MeyerG.CarlyleK. (2007). The effects of favor and apology on compliance. Communication Research, 34(6), 575-595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650207307896
14.
GoffmanE. (1967). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. In GoffmanE. (Ed.), Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior (pp. 5-46). Pantheon Books.
15.
GoldsmithD. J. (2000). Soliciting advice: The role of sequential placement in mitigating face threat. Communication Monographs, 67(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750009376492
HoltgravesT. M.KashimaY. (2008). Language, meaning, and social cognition. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(1), 73-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307309605
19.
KaneA. A.RinkF. (2015). How newcomers influence group utilization of their knowledge: Integrating versus differentiating strategies. Group Dynamics, 19(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000024
20.
KaranA.WrightR. C.RobbinsM. L. (2016). Everyday emotion word and personal pronoun use reflects dyadic adjustment among couples coping with breast cancer. Personal Relations, 24(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12165
21.
LeonardD. J.MackieD.SmithE. R. (2011). Emotional responses to intergroup apology mediate intergroup forgiveness and retribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1198-1206. http://doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.002
22.
MacGeorgeE. L.FengB.ButlerG. L.BudarzS. K. (2004). Understanding advice in supportive interactions: Beyond the facework and message evaluation paradigm. Human Communication Research, 30(1), 42-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00724.x
23.
MacGeorgeE. L.FengB.ThompsonE. (2008). “Good” and “bad” advice: How to advise more effectively. In MotleyM. (Ed.), Applied interpersonal communication: Behaviors that affect outcomes (pp. 145-164). Sage.
24.
MacGeorgeE. M.GuntzvillerL. M.BranchS. E.YakovaL. (2019). Advice in interaction: Quantity and placement of problem-solving behaviors. Communication Research, 46(6), 811-837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215607612
25.
MacGeorgeE. M.GuntzvillerL. M.HanasonoL. K.FengB. (2016). Testing advice response theory in interactions with friends. Communication Research, 43(2), 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213510938
26.
MillerD. T.VidmarN. (1981). The social psychology of punishment reactions. In LernerM. J.LernerS. C. (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 145-172). Plenum Press.
27.
OhbuchiK.KamedaM.AgaricN. (1989). Apology as aggression control: Its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 219-227. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.219
28.
PaikJ. E. (2020). The contextual effects of advice solicitation on advice outcomes: The role of perceived face threats and psychological reactance. Communication Monographs, 87(1), 70-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1641729
29.
PennebakerJ. W. (2011). The secret life of pronouns: What our words say about us. Bloomsbury Press.
30.
PennebakerJ. W.BoothR. J.BoydR. L.FrancisM. E. (2015). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC 2015. Pennebaker Conglomerates.
31.
PennebakerJ. W.StoneL. E. (2003). Words of wisdom: Language use over the life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 291-301. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.291
32.
ScherS. J.DarleyJ. M. (1997). How effective are the things people say to apologize? Effects of the realization of the apology speech act. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(1). 127-140. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025068306386
33.
SkarlickiD. P.FolgerR.GeeJ. (2004). When social accounts backfire: The exacerbating effects of a polite message or an apology on reactions to an unfair outcome. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 322-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02550.x
34.
SniezekJ. A.BuckleyT. (1995). Cueing and cognitive conflict in judge-advisor decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(2), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1040
35.
SniezekJ. A.PaeseP. W.SwitzerF. S. (1990). The effect of choosing on confidence in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46(2), 264-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(90)90032-5
Van SwolL. M.CarlsonC. L. (2017). Language use and influence among minority, majority, and homogeneous group members. Communication Research, 44(4), 512-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215570658
38.
Van SwolL. M.KaneA. (2019). Language and group processes: An integrative, interdisciplinary review. Small Group Research, 50(1), 3-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496418785019
39.
Van SwolL. M.MacGeorgeE.PrahlA. (2017). Advise with permission? The effects of advice utilization on advice outcomes. Communication Studies, 68(4), 476-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2017.1363795
40.
Van SwolL. M.PaikJ. E.PrahlA. (2018). Advice recipients: The psychology of advice utilization. In MacGeorgeE. L.Van SwolL. M. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of advice. Oxford University Press.
YanivI.Choshen-HillelS. (2012). Exploiting the wisdom of others to make better decisions: Suspending judgment reduces egocentrism and increases accuracy. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(5), 427-434. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.740
43.
YanivI.KleinbergerE. (2000). Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(2), 260-281. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2909
44.
WilsonS. R.AlemanC. G.LeathamG. B. (1998). Identity implications of influence goals: A revised analysis of face-threatening acts and application to seeking compliance with same-sex friends. Human Communication Research, 25(1), 64-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00437.x
