What are the common linguistic features of top-rated romance novels? The open vocabulary method was performed on 703 romance novels to determine what words were commonly used in the highest rated romance novels. Results revealed that the highest rated novels contained words related to arousal, sexual/primal prowess, and sexual communication. Our research team discusses the ability for words to capture psychological underpinnings related to readers and directions for future research.
AltenburgerL. E.CarottaC. L.BonomiA. E.SnyderA. (2017). Sexist attitudes among emerging adult women readers of Fifty Shades fiction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 455-464.
2.
BagchiJ. (2000). Looking for reality in romance. Social Scientist, 28, 30-39.
3.
BarrettA.MurphyM.BlackburnK. (2017). “Playing hooky” health messages: Apprehension, impression management, and deception. Health Communication, 33, 1-12.
4.
BeukeboomC. J.TanisM.VermeulenI. E. (2013). The language of extraversion: Extraverted people talk more abstractly, introverts are more concrete. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 191-201.
5.
BoydR. L. (2017). MEH: Meaning Extraction Helper (Version 1.4.20) [Software]. Retrieved from https://meh.ryanb.cc
6.
BradfordA.MestonC. M. (2006). The impact of anxiety on sexual arousal in women. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1067-1077.
7.
BussD. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-14.
8.
CoxA.FisherM. (2009). The Texas billionaire’s pregnant bride: An evolutionary interpretation of romance fiction titles. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 3, 386-401.
9.
de MunckV.KorotayevA.KhaltourinaD. (2010). A comparative study of the structure of love in the U.S. and Russia: Finding a common core of characteristics and national and gender differences. Ethnology: An International Journal of Cultural and Social Anthropology, 48, 337-357.
10.
DragojevicM.BerglundC.BlauveltT. K. (2018). Figuring out who’s who: The role of social categorization in the language attitudes process. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37, 28-50.
11.
EdwardsR.HoneycuttJ. M.ZagackiK. S. (1989). Sex differences in imagined interactions. Sex Roles, 21, 263-272.
12.
EllisB. J.SymonsD. (1990). Sex differences in sexual fantasy: An evolutionary psychological approach. Journal of Sex Research, 27, 527-555.
13.
FehrB.RussellJ. A. (1991). The concept of love viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 425. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.425
14.
HancockT. (2007). The chemistry of love poetry. Cambridge Quarterly, 36, 197-228.
15.
HatfieldE. L.RapsonR. L. (2006). Passionate love, sexual desire, and mate selection: Cross-cultural and historical perspectives. In NollerP.FeeneyJ. A. (Eds.), Close relationships: Functions, forms and processes (pp. 227-243). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
16.
HoneycuttJ. M.ZagackiK. S.EdwardsR. (1990). Imagined interaction and interpersonal communication. Communication Reports, 3, 1-8.
17.
IrelandM. E.SlatcherR. B.EastwickP. W.ScissorsL. E.FinkelE. J.PennebakerJ. W. (2011). Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science, 22, 39-44.
18.
JonasonP. K.RaulstonT.RotoloA. (2012). More than just a pretty face and a hot body: Multiple cues in mate-choice. Journal of Social Psychology, 152, 174-184.
19.
KimJ. L.WardL. M. (2004). Pleasure reading: Associations between young women’s sexual attitudes and their reading of contemporary women’s magazines. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 48-58.
20.
LasernaC. M.SeihY. T.PennebakerJ. W. (2014). Um . . . who like says you know: Filler word use as a function of age, gender, and personality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 328-338.
MénardA. D.CabreraC. (2011). “Whatever the approach, tab b still fits into slot a”: Twenty years of sex scripts in romance novels. Sexuality & Culture, 15, 240-255.
23.
MestonC. M.BussD. M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 477-507.
24.
NewmanM. L.GroomC. J.HandelmanL. D.PennebakerJ. W. (2008). Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, 45, 211-236.
25.
PennebakerJ. W. (2011). The secret life of pronouns: What our words say about us. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
26.
RanganathR.JurafskyD.McfarlandD. (2009, August). It’s not you, it’s me: Detecting flirting and its misperception in speed-dates. Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Singapore, EMNLP 09, 1, 334-342. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f067/a59344f424fc063144441696d6040778b755.pdf
27.
RaubP. (1994). A new woman or an old-fashioned girl? The portrayal of the heroine in popular women’s novels of the twenties. American Studies, 35, 109-130.
RoachC. (2016). Find your one true love: Book lovers and the romance story. In FirmageG. J. (Ed.). Happily ever after: The romance story in popular culture (pp. 3-27). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
RubinZ. (1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 265-273.
32.
ScheibJ. E.GangestadS. W.ThornhillR. (1999). Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 266, 1913-1917.
33.
SchwartzH. A.EichstaedtJ. C.KernM. L.DziurzynskiL.RamonesS. M.AgrawalM.. . . UngarL. H. (2013). Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: The open-vocabulary approach. PLoS ONE, 8, e73791.
34.
SternbergR. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119-135.
35.
SternbergR. J. (2004). A triangular theory of love. Close Relationships, 93, 213-227.
36.
SternbergR. J.BarnesM. L. (1988). An introduction to the psychology of love. In SternbergR. J.WatsonM. L. (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 3-12). New Haven, CT. Yale University Press.
37.
VaillancourtT. (2013). Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy?Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 368, 1-7.
38.
WilburC. J.CampbellL. (2010). What do women want? An interactionist account of women’s mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 749-754.
