“He Is Just the Nowhere Man of British Politics”: Personal Attacks in Prime Minister’s Questions

Abstract

Views from the media, the public, and from inside Parliament have expressed discontent with, reportedly, recent high levels of personally antagonistic behavior in Prime Minister’s Questions. The focus of this study is a fine-grained analysis of language classified as a personal attack. A personal attack coding system was devised, and significant individual differences between Prime Ministers and increases across individual premierships were observed. Of the five Prime Ministers between 1979 and 2016, David Cameron was the most personally aggressive, though a significant decrease followed Jeremy Corbyn’s appointment as Leader of the Opposition. Potential explanations for recent highs include heightened TV and social media attention coupled with sports-like reporting and party expectation, and not discounting individual personalities or intergroup theories. Suggestions for the functions of personal attacks include highlighting differences, disarming or deconstructing adversaries, and equivocation. Further explanations are offered for the relative politeness of Cameron versus Corbyn.

Keywords

PMQs personalisation personalization personal attacks disrespect impoliteness rudeness insults incivility

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

Fox

Geis-King

Gibbons

Korris

Pavlova

Raftery

(2014). Tuned in or turned off? Public attitudes to Prime Minister’s Questions. London, England: Hansard Society.

Bates

S. R.

Kerr

Byrne

Stanley

(2014). Questions to the Prime Minister: A comparative study of PMQs from Thatcher to Cameron. Parliamentary Affairs, 67(2), 253-280.

BBC. (2011, October 2). Transcript David Cameron interview. The Andrew Marr Show. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/andrew_marr_show/9605621.stm

Bercow

(2010, July 6). Speech to the Centre for Parliamentary Studies. Retrieved from http://www.parliament.uk/business/commons/the-speaker/speeches/speeches/speech-to-the-centre-for-parliamentary-studies/

Blair

(2010). A journey. London, England: Hutchinson.

Brooks

D. J.

Geer

J. G.

(2007). Beyond negativity: The effects of incivility on the electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 1-16.

Brown

A. M.

(2011, June 23). Does “brusque” and “rude” David Cameron suffer from Boarding School Syndrome? The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/andrewmcfbrown/100093533/does-brusque-and-rude-david-cameron-suffer-from-boarding-school-syndrome/

Brown

Levinson

S. C.

(1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody

E. N.

(Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56-289). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Brown

Levinson

S. C.

(1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Bull

(1994). On identifying questions, replies, and non-replies in political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13(2), 115-131.

11.

Bull

Fetzer

(2010). Face, facework and political discourse. International Review of Social Psychology, 23(2/3), 155-185.

12.

Bull

Fetzer

Waddle

(2016, April). “I quote and I am not making this up”: The role of quotations in the adversarial discourse of Prime Minister’s Questions. Paper presented at the British Psychological Society Annual Conference, Nottingham, England.

13.

Bull

Wells

(2012). Adversarial discourse in Prime Minister’s Questions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(1), 30-48.

14.

Burnham

Jones

G. W.

Elgie

(1995). The parliamentary activity of John Major, 1990-94. British Journal of Political Science, 25(4), 551-563.

15.

Cameron

D. W. D.

(2005, December 6). Full text of David Cameron’s victory speech. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2005/dec/06/toryleadership2005.conservatives3

16.

Campbell

(2007, June 24). Wit, oratory—and evasion: A master debater at work. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/books/2007/jun/24/politics.houseofcommons

17.

Chorley

(2013, December 4). ‘Buffoons, morons and braying donkeys’: What voters REALLY think about MPs’ antics at Prime Minister’s Questions. MailOnline. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2517966/Buffoons-morons-braying-donkeys-What-voters-REALLY-think-MPs-antics-Prime-Ministers-Questions-revealed.html

18.

Coe

Kelly

(2009, October 6). Prime Minister’s Questions (Standard note SN/PC/05183). London, England: House of Commons Library.

19.

Cohen

(1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46.

20.

Cohen

(1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.

21.

Culpeper

(1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 349-367.

22.

Culpeper

(2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

23.

Dragojevic

Giles

(2014). Language and interpersonal communication: Their intergroup dynamics. In Berger

C. R.

(Ed.), Interpersonal communication (pp. 29-51). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.

24.

Druckman

J. N.

Kifer

M. J.

Parkin

(2010). Timeless strategy meets new medium: Going negative on congressional campaign web sites, 2002-2006. Political Communication, 27(1), 88-103.

25.

Feldman

Valenty

L. O.

(2001). Profiling political leaders: Cross-cultural studies of personality and behavior. Westport, CT: Praeger.

26.

Flinders

Weinberg

Geddes

(2016, April). The health of democracy recast: The politics of mental health and the mental health of politicians. Paper presented at the British Psychological Society Annual Conference, Nottingham, England.

27.

Flinders

M. V.

(2012). The demonisation of politicians: Moral panics, folk devils and MPs’ expenses. Contemporary Politics, 18(1), 1-17.

28.

Giddings

Irwin

(2005). Objects and questions. In Giddings

(Ed.), The future of Parliament (pp. 67-77). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

29.

Gimson

(2012). PMQs: That’s the way to do it! British Journalism Review, 23(3), 11-13.

30.

Goffman

(1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 18(3), 213-231.

31.

Goffman

(1967). Interaction ritual. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

32.

Greatbatch

(1986). Aspects of topical organization in news interviews: The use of agenda-shifting procedures by interviewees. Media, Culture & Society, 8(4), 441-455.

33.

Hague

(2002, April 26). What I learned about Tony—the hard way. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2002/apr/26/fiveyearsoflabour.labour

34.

Hardman

(2015, September 22). Speaker Bercow: Corbyn will need to stick with new PMQs tone for months. The Spectator. Retrieved from http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2015/09/speaker-bercow-corbyn-will-need-to-stick-with-new-pmqs-tone-for-months/

35.

Harris

(2001). Being politically impolite: Extending politeness theory to adversarial political discourse. Discourse & Society, 12(4), 451-472.

36.

Hoggart

(2011, December 14). Prime Minister’s Questions—or an unpleasant football match. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/dec/14/prime-ministers-questions-football-match

37.

House of Commons Information Office. (2010a). Parliamentary Questions (Factsheet P1, Procedure Series). Retrieved from https://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-information-office/p01.pdf

38.

House of Commons Information Office. (2010b). The Official Report (Factsheet G17, General Series). Retrieved from https://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-information-office/g17.pdf

39.

Hughes

(2016, September 12). One year into Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership, Labour suffers worst opinion poll ratings the party has ever experienced in opposition. The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/12/jeremy-corbyns-labour-suffers-worst-opinion-poll-ratings-the-par/

40.

Ilie

(2004). Insulting as (un)parliamentary practice in the British and Swedish parliaments: A rhetorical approach. In Bayley

(Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse (pp. 45-86). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

41.

ITV. (2015, August 14). Jeremy Corbyn promises ‘new kind of politics’ as he unveils 10-point policy plan. ITV Report. Retrieved from http://www.itv.com/news/2015-08-14/jeremy-corbyn-promises-new-kind-of-politics-as-he-unveils-10-point-policy-plan/

42.

Jones

G. W.

(1973). The Prime Minister and parliamentary questions. Parliamentary Affairs, 26, 260-273.

43.

Landis

J. R.

Koch

G. G.

(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.

44.

Lees

(2015, September 16). The saint in the bear pit: Reviewing Jeremy Corbyn’s first PMQs. The Conversation. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/the-saint-in-the-bear-pit-reviewing-jeremy-corbyns-first-pmqs-47510

45.

Lester

J. C.

(1994). The evolution of the political compass (and why libertarianism is not right-wing). Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 17(3), 231-241.

46.

Lijphart

(2012). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

47.

Lovenduski

(2012). Prime Minister’s Questions as political ritual. British Politics, 7(4), 314-340.

48.

Muddiman

(2017). Personal and public levels of political incivility. International Journal of Communication, 11, 3182-3202.

49.

Murphy

(2014). (Im)politeness during Prime Minister’s Questions in the U.K. Parliament. Pragmatics and Society, 5(1), 76-104.

50.

Post

J. M.

(Ed.). (2003). The psychological assessment of political leaders: With profiles of Saddam Hussein and Bill Clinton. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

51.

Reid

(2014). Rhetoric and parliamentary leadership: Prime Minister’s Questions. In Atkins

Finlayson

Martin

Turnbull

(Eds.), Rhetoric in British politics and society (pp. 45-57). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

52.

Schopenhauer

(1896). The art of controversy ( Saunders

T. B.

Trans.). (Original work published 1831). Retrieved from https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopenhauer/arthur/controversy/complete.html

53.

Sobieraj

Berry

J. M.

(2011). From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news. Political Communication, 28(1), 19-41.

54.

Waddle

Bull

(2016). Playing the man, not the ball: Personalisation in political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35(4), 412-434.

55.

Wolf

M. R.

Strachan

J. C.

Shea

D. M.

(2012). Incivility and standing firm: A second layer of partisan division. PS: Political Science & Politics, 45(3), 428-434.