This article analyzes mockery sequences among a group of friends to examine how this discursive practice mobilizes categories to manage stances toward differences and to construct group norms and boundaries. Using discourse analysis, I inspect how nonseriously tearing down or jocularly teasing/mocking participants within a peer group manages the practical problem of in-group difference by reaffirming shared stances and norms around masculinity. The analysis highlights some of the ways in which groups navigate difference and identity moment-to-moment in interaction, showing how the moral organization of in-group and out-group assessments are built in the mundane world of conversation.
ÅhlundA.AronssonK. (2015). Stylizations and alignments in a L2 classroom: Multiparty work in forming a community of practice. Language & Communication, 43, 11-26.
2.
AntakiC.WiddicombeS. (Eds.). (1998). Identities in talk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
BaileyB. (2000). Communicative behavior and conflict between African-American customers and Korean immigrant retailers in Los Angeles. Discourse & Society, 11, 86-108.
4.
BilligM. (2001). Humour and embarrassment: Limits of “nice-guy” theories of social life. Theory, Culture & Society, 18, 23-43.
5.
BondR. (2005). Group size and conformity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 331-354.
6.
BucholtzM.HallK. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7, 585-614.
7.
CameronD. (1998). “Is there any ketchup, Vera?”: Gender, power and pragmatics. Discourse & Society, 9, 437-455.
8.
CohenJ. M. (1977). Sources of peer group homogeneity. Sociology of Education, 50, 227-241.
9.
De FinaA. (2007). Code-switching and the construction of ethnic identity in a community of practice. Language in Society, 36, 371-392.
10.
DrewP. (1987). Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics, 25, 219-253.
11.
EdwardsD. (1991). Categories are for talking: On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization. Theory & Psychology, 1, 515-542.
EhrlichS.RomaniukT. (2014). Discourse analysis. In PodesvaP. R. J.SharmaD. D. (Eds.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 460-493). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14.
EvaldssonA. C. (2005). Staging insults and mobilizing categorizations in a multiethnic peer group. Discourse & Society, 16, 763-786.
15.
FineG. A.SouceyM. D. (2005). Joking cultures: Humor themes as social regulation in group life. Humor, 18, 1-22.
16.
GilesH.CouplandJ.CouplandN. (Eds.). (1991). Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
17.
GoffmanE. (1956). Embarrassment and social organization. American Journal of Sociology, 62, 264-271.
18.
GoffmanE. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face to face behavior. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
19.
GoffmanE. (1979). Footing. Semiotica, 25, 1-30.
20.
GoodwinC. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18, 53-73.
21.
GoodwinM. H. (2002). Exclusion in girls’ peer groups: Ethnographic analysis of language practices on the playground. Human Development, 45, 392-415.
22.
GoodwinM. H. (2007). The hidden life of girls: Games of stance, status, and exclusion. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
23.
GordonC. (2008). A (p) parent play: Blending frames and reframing in family talk. Language in Society, 37, 319-349.
24.
GumperzJ. J. (1989). Contextualization cues and metapragmatics: The retrieval of cultural knowledge. In WiltshireC.GraczykR.MusicB. (Eds.), Papers from the 25th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Part One. The general session (pp. 77-88). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
25.
GudykunstW. B.YoonY.NishidaT. (1987). The influence of individualism-collectivism on perceptions of communication in ingroup and outgroup relationships. Communication Monographs, 54, 295-306.
26.
HaughM. (2010). Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation, and face. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2106-2119.
27.
JaworskiA.CouplandJ. (2005). Othering in gossip: “You go out you have a laugh and you can pull yeah okay but like . . .”. Language in Society, 34, 667-694.
28.
JayyusiL. (2014). Categorization and the moral order. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
29.
JeffersonG. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In LernerG. (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
30.
KalkhoffW.BarnumC. (2000). The effects of status-organizing and social identity processes on patterns of social influence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 95-115.
31.
KochmanT. (1983). The boundary between play and nonplay in black verbal dueling. Language in Society, 12, 329-337.
32.
LonsdaleA. J.NorthA. C. (2009). Musical taste and ingroup favouritism. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 319-327.
33.
MaynardD. W.ZimmermanD. H. (1984). Topical talk, ritual and the social organization of relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 301-316.
34.
NorrickN. R.SpitzA. (2008). Humor as a resource for mitigating conflict in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 1661-1686.
35.
O’MearaC. (2003). The raincoats: Breaking down punk rock’s masculinities. Popular Music, 22, 299-313.
36.
PagliaroS.EllemersN.BarretoM. (2011). Sharing moral values: Anticipated ingroup respect as a determinant of adherence to morality-based (but not competence-based) group norms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1117-1129.
37.
PaolettiI. (1998). Handling “incoherence” according to the speaker’s on-sight categorization. In AntakiC.WiddicombeS. (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 171-190). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
PomerantzA. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In AtkinsonJ. M.HeritageJ. (Eds.), Structures of social actions: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39.
PotterJ. (2012). Discourse analysis and discursive psychology. In CooperH. (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in psychology (pp. 111-130). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
40.
ReynoldsE. (2017). Description of membership and enacting membership: Seeing-a-lift, being a team. Journal of Pragmatics, 118, 99-119.
41.
RoblesJ. S. (2015). Extreme case (re)formulation as a practice for making hearably-racist talk repairable. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34, 390-409.
42.
RoblesJ. S. (2016). Constructing group membership through talk in the field. In KuryloA. (Ed.), Negotiating group identity in the research process: Are you in or are you out? (pp. 85-102). London, England: Lexington Books.
43.
SacksH. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
44.
SierraS. (2016). Playing out loud: Videogame references as resources in friend interaction for managing frames, epistemics, and group identity. Language in Society, 45, 217-245.
45.
StokoeE. (2012). Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies, 14, 277-303.
46.
StokoeE.EdwardsD. (2014). Mundane morality: Gender, categories and complaints in familial neighbour disputes. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 9, 165-192.
47.
TajfelH.BilligM. G.BundyR. P.FlamentC. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
48.
TheobaldM.ReynoldsE. (2015). In pursuit of some appreciation: Assessment and group membership in children’s second stories. Text & Talk, 35, 407-430.
TracyK.RoblesJ. S. (2010). Challenges of interviewers’ institutional positionings: Taking account of interview content and the interaction. Communication Methods and Measures, 4, 177-200.
51.
TracyK.RoblesJ. S. (2013). Everyday talk: Building and reflecting identities. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
52.
WaltonS.JaffeA. (2011). “Stuff white people like”: Stance, class, race, and internet commentary. In ThurlowC.MroczekK. (Eds.), Digital discourse: Language in the new media (pp. 199-219). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
WiddicombeS.WooffittR. (1990). “Being” versus “doing” punk: On achieving authenticity as a member. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9, 257-277.
55.
WhiteheadK. A. (2009). “Categorizing the categorizer”: The management of racial common sense in interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72, 325-342.
56.
WhiteheadK. A. (2012). Racial categories as resources and constraints in everyday interactions: Implications for racialism and non-racialism in post-apartheid South Africa. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35, 1248-1265.
