Guided by feelings-as-information theory, this experiment examined whether the difficulty of language in public opinion questions would influence reports of political interest and political efficacy. Results (N = 235) found that exposure to the easy language condition led to higher reports of political interest and efficacy than in the difficult language condition and that this effect was mediated by processing fluency. These findings proffer implications for the strategic use of language in political engagement and civic education initiatives.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
3.
CraigS. C.NiemiR. G.SilverG. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12, 289-314.
4.
Delli CarpiniM. X. (2000). Gen.com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication, 17, 341-349.
5.
FleschR. (1979). How to write plain English: A book for lawyers and consumers. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
6.
GastilJ.XenosM. (2010). Of attitudes and engagement: Clarifying the reciprocal relationship between civic attitudes and political participation. Journal of Communication, 60, 318-343.
7.
GilesH. (2016). Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal and social identities across contexts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8.
HayesA. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408-420.
KincaidJ. P.FishburneR. P.RogersR. L.ChissomB. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count, and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Washington, DC: National Technical Information Service.
11.
McLeodJ. M.ScheufeleD. A.MoyP. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16, 315-336.
12.
NabatchiT. (2010). Deliberative democracy and citizenship: In search of the efficacy effect. Journal of Public Deliberation, 6, 1-47.
13.
NiemiR. G.CraigS. C.MatteiF. (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 national election study. American Political Science Review, 85, 1407-1413.
14.
O’KeefeD. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13, 251-274.
15.
PettyR. E.BriñolP.TormalaZ. L.WegenerD. T. (2007). The role of meta-cognition in social judgment. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 254-284). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16.
PriorM. (2010). You’ve either got it or you don’t? The stability of political interest over the life cycle. Journal of Politics, 72, 747-766.
17.
SchlozmanK. L.VerbaS.BradyH. E. (1997). The big tilt: Participatory inequality in America. American Prospect, 8, 74-80.
18.
SchwarzN. (1998). Accessible content and accessibility experiences: The interplay of declarative and experiential information in judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 87-99.
19.
SchwarzN. (2006). Feelings, fit, and funny effects: A situated cognition perspective. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 20-23.
20.
SchwarzN. (2010). Meaning in context: Metacognitive experiences. In MesquitaB.BarrettL. F.SmithE. R. (Eds.), The mind in context (pp. 105-125). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21.
SchwarzN. (2011). Feelings-as-information theory. In Van LangeP.KruglanskiA.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289-308). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
SchwarzN.BlessH.StrackF.KlumppG.Rittenauer-SchatkaH.SimonsA. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195-202.
23.
SchwarzN.SannaL. J.SkurnikI.YoonC. (2007). Metacognitive experiences and the intricacies of setting people straight: Implications for debiasing and public information campaigns. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 127-161.
24.
SlaterM. D.GleasonL. S. (2012). Contributing to theory and knowledge in quantitative communication science. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 215-236.
25.
SongH.SchwarzN. (2009). If it’s difficult to pronounce, it must be risky: Fluency, familiarity, and risk perception. Psychological Science, 20, 135-138.
26.
ThompsonV. A. (2009). Dual process theories: A metacognitive perspective. In EvansJ. St. B. T.FrankishK. (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 171-196). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.
28.
WhittleseaB. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1235-1253.
29.
WinkielmanP.SchwarzN.FazendeiroT.ReberR. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In MuschJ.KlauerK. C. (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189-217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30.
ZallerJ. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
