Features of advice messages have received considerable attention in prior research, but the framing of advice has remained underexplored. This study examined the influence of advice message framing (i.e., gain-framed message vs. loss-framed message) on recipients’ responses to advice in terms of evaluation of advice quality, facilitation of coping, and intention to implement advice. The mediating roles of regard for face and efficacy were also assessed. A total of 605 participants read and responded to a hypothetical conversation in which they received advice from a friend. Results indicated that gain-framed advice messages elicited higher evaluations of advice quality and higher perceptions of facilitation of coping in comparison with loss-framed advice messages. Recipient’s perceptions of the advice-giver’s regard for face mediated the impact of framing on evaluation of advice quality and facilitation of coping.
AljasemL. I.PeyrotM.WissowL.RubinR. R. (2001). The impact of barriers and self-efficacy on self-care behaviors in type 2 diabetes. The Diabetes Educator, 27, 393-404.
2.
ApanovitchA. M.McCarthyD.SaloveyP. (2003). Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women. Health Psychology, 22, 60-67.
3.
AroraN. K.Finney RuttenL. J.GustafsonD. H.MoserR.HawkinsR. P. (2007). Perceived helpfulness and impact of social support provided by family, friends, and health care providers to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 474-486.
4.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
5.
BanduraA. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
6.
BlockL. G.KellerP. A. (1995). When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 192-203.
7.
BoyerK. E.PhillipsR.WallisM.VoukM.LesterJ. (2008). Balancing cognitive and motivational scaffolding in tutorial dialogue. In WoolfB. P.AimeurE.NkambouR.LajoieS. (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 239-249). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
8.
BrownP.LevinsonS. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BurlesonB. R.MacGeorgeE. L. (2002). Supportive communication. In KnappM. L.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 374-424). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
CervoneD. (2000). Thinking about self-efficacy. Behavior Modification, 24, 30-56.
11.
CoxD.CoxA. D. (2001). Communicating the consequences of early detection: The role of evidence and framing. Journal of Marketing, 65, 91-103.
12.
DetweilerJ. B.BedellB. T.SaloveyP.ProninE.RothmanA. J. (1999). Message framing and sunscreen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psychology, 18, 189-196.
13.
Devos-CombyL.SaloveyP. (2002). Applying persuasion strategies to alter HIV-relevant thoughts and behavior. Review of General Psychology, 6, 287-304.
14.
DillardJ. P.NabiR. L. (2006). The persuasive influence of emotion in cancer prevention and detection messages. Journal of Communication, 56, 123-139.
15.
DuricV.StocklerM. (2001). Patients’ preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: A review of what makes it worthwhile. Lancet: Oncology, 2, 691-697.
16.
EptonT.HarrisP. R. (2008). Self-affirmation promotes health behavior change. Health Psychology, 27, 746-752.
17.
FengB. (2009). Testing an integrated model of advice giving in supportive interactions. Human Communication Research, 35, 115-129.
18.
FengB. (2014). When should advice be given? Assessing the role of sequential placement of advice in supportive interactions in two cultures. Communication Research, 41, 913-934.
19.
FengB.BurlesonB. R. (2006). Exploring the support-seeking process across cultures: Toward an integrated analysis of similarities and differences. In OrbeM. P.AllenB. J.FloresL. A. (Eds.), International and intercultural communication annual (pp. 243-266). Washington, DC: National Communication Association.
20.
FengB.BurlesonB. R. (2008). The effects of argument explicitness on responses to advice in supportive interactions. Communication Research, 35, 849-874.
21.
FengB.LiS.LiN. (2016). Is a profile worth a thousand words? How online support-seeker’s profile featuresmayinfluence the quality of received support messages. Communication Research, 43, 253-276.
22.
FengB.MacGeorgeE. L. (2006). Predicting receptiveness to advice: Characteristics of the problem, the advice-giver, and the recipient. Southern Communication Journal, 71, 67-85.
23.
FengB.MacGeorgeE. L. (2010). The influences of message and source factors on advice outcomes. Communication Research, 37, 553-575.
24.
FengB.MagenE. (2016). Relationship closeness predicts unsolicited advice giving in supportive interactions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33, 751-767. doi:10.1177/0265407515592262
25.
FerrerR. A.KleinW. M.ZajacL. E.LandS. R.LingB. S. (2012). An affective booster moderates the effect of gain-and loss-framed messages on behavioral intentions for colorectal cancer screening. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 452-461.
26.
FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London, England: Sage.
27.
FinneyL.IannotiR. (2002). Message framing and mammography screening: A theory-driven intervention. Behavioral Medicine, 28, 5-14.
28.
FloydD. L.Prentice-DunnS.RogersR. W. (2000). A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 407-429.
29.
FrantzC. M.BennigsonC. (2005). Better late than early: The influence of timing on apology effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 201-207.
30.
GallagherK. M.UpdegraffJ. A. (2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43, 101-116.
31.
GallagherK. M.UpdegraffJ. A.RothmanA. J.SimsL. (2011). Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer moderates the effect of gain-and loss-framed messages on use of screening mammography. Health Psychology, 30, 145-152.
32.
GerendM. A.CullenM. (2008). Effects of message framing and temporal context on college student drinking behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1167-1173.
33.
GerendM. A.ManerJ. K. (2011). Fear, anger, fruits, and veggies: Interactive effects of emotion and message framing on health behavior. Health Psychology, 30, 420-423.
34.
GoeiR.BoysonA. R.Lyon-CalloS. K.SchottC.WasilevichE.CannarileS. (2010). An examination of EPPM predictions when threat is perceived externally: An asthma intervention with school workers. Health Communication, 25, 333-344.
35.
GoldsmithD. J. (1999). Content-based resources for giving face sensitive advice in troubles talk episodes. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 303-336.
36.
GoldsmithD. J.FitchK. (1997). The normative context of advice as social support. Human Communication Research, 23, 454-476.
37.
GoldsmithD. J.MacGeorgeE. L. (2000). The impact of politeness and relationship on perceived quality of advice about a problem. Human Communication Research, 26, 234-263.
HayesA. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40.
HirschbergerG.FlorianV.MikulincerM. (2003). Strivings for romantic intimacy following partner complaint or partner criticism: A terror management perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 675-687.
41.
JacksonJ. W. (2002). Enhancing self-efficacy and learning performance. Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 243-254.
42.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 2, 263-291.
43.
KavanaghD. J.BowerG. H. (1985). Mood and self-efficacy: Impact of joy and sadness on perceived capabilities. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9, 507-525.
44.
KellerP. A. (2006). Regulatory focus and efficacy of health messages. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 109-114.
45.
KievikM.GuttelingJ. M. (2011). Yes, we can: Motivate Dutch citizens to engage in self-protective behavior with regard to flood risks. Natural Hazards, 59, 1475-1490.
46.
KoenigC. J. (2011). Patient resistance as agency in treatment decisions. Social Science & Medicine, 72, 1105-1114.
47.
LeeA. Y.AakerJ. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 205-218.
48.
LehmanD. R.EllardJ. H.WortmanC. B. (1986). Social support for the bereaved: Recipients’ and providers’ perspectives on what is helpful. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 438-446.
49.
LewisI. M.WatsonB.WhiteK. M. (2010). Response efficacy: The key to minimizing rejection and maximizing acceptance of emotion-based anti-speeding messages. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42, 459-467.
50.
LomiA.LusherD.PattisonP. E.RobinsG. (2013). The focused organization of advice relations: A study in boundary crossing. Organization Science, 25, 438-457.
51.
MacGeorgeE. L.FengB.BurlesonB. (2011). Supportive communication. In KnappM. L.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 317-354). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
MacGeorgeE. L.FengB.ButlerG. L.BudarzS. K. (2004). Understanding advice in supportive interactions: Beyond the facework and message evaluation paradigm. Human Communication Research, 30, 42-70.
53.
MacGeorgeE. L.FengB.ThompsonE. (2008). “Good” and “bad” advice: How to advise more effectively. In MotleyM. (Ed.), Applied interpersonal communication: Behaviors that affect outcomes (pp. 145-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54.
MacGeorgeE. L.GravesA. R.FengB.GillihanS. J.BurlesonB. R. (2004). The myth of gender cultures: Similarities outweigh differences in men’s and women’s provision of and responses to supportive communication. Sex Roles, 50, 143-175.
55.
MacGeorgeE. L.GuntzvillerL. M.HanasonoL. K.FengB. (2016). Testing advice response theory in interactions with friends. Communication Research, 43, 211-231.
56.
MacGeorgeE. L.LichtmanR. M.PresseyL. C. (2002). The evaluation of advice in supportive interactions: Facework and contextual factors. Human Communication Research, 28, 451-463.
57.
MadduxJ. E.RogersR. W. (1983). Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 469-479.
58.
MaheswaranD.Meyers-LevyJ. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 361-367.
59.
McKayD. L.BerkowitzJ. M.BlumbergJ. B.GoldbergJ. P. (2004). Communicating cardiovascular disease risk due to elevated homocysteine levels: Using the EPPM to develop print materials. Health Education & Behavior, 31, 355-371.
60.
MoriartyC. M.StrykerJ. E. (2008). Prevention and screening efficacy messages in newspaper accounts of cancer. Health Education Research, 23, 487-498.
61.
MurphyS. M.RosenmanR.YoderJ. K.FriesnerD. L. (2011). Patients’ perceptions and treatment effectiveness. Applied Economics, 43, 3275-3288.
62.
Murray-JohnsonL.WitteK. (2003). Looking toward the future: Health message design strategies. In ThompsonT. L.DorseyA. M.MillerK. I.ParrottR. (Eds.), Handbook of health communication (pp. 473-495). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63.
O’KeefeD. J. (2015). Persuasion: Theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
O’KeefeD. J.JensenJ. D. (2006). The advantages of compliance or the disadvantages of noncompliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasive effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages. In BeckC. S. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 30 (pp. 1-44). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
65.
O’KeefeD. J.JensenJ. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 623-644.
66.
O’KeefeD. J.JensenJ. D. (2008). Do loss-framed persuasive messages engender greater message processing than do gain-framed messages? A meta-analytic review. Communication Studies, 59, 51-67.
67.
O’KeefeD. J.JensenJ. D. (2009). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59, 296-316.
68.
PerloffR. M. (2010). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Routledge.
69.
PettyR. E.RuckerD. D.BizerG. Y.CacioppoJ. T. (2004). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In SeiterJ. S.GassR. H. (Eds.), Perspectives on persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining (pp. 65-89). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
70.
QuimbyJ. L.O’BrienK. M. (2004). Predictors of student and career decision-making self-efficacy among nontraditional college women. Career Development Quarterly, 52, 323-339.
71.
RaboisD.HaagaD. A. (2003). The influence of cognitive coping and mood on smokers’ self-efficacy and temptation. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 561-573.
72.
ReidJ.SchmiedV.BealeB. (2010). “I only give advice if I am asked”: Examining the grandmother’s potential to influence infant feeding decisions and parenting practices of new mothers. Women and Birth, 23, 74-80.
73.
RietJ.RuiterR. A. C.WerrijM. Q.de VriesH. (2008). The influence of self-efficacy on the effects of framed health messages. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 800-809.
74.
RietJ.RuiterR. A. C.WerrijM. Q.de VriesH. (2010). Self-efficacy moderates message-framing effects: The case of skin-cancer detection. Psychology & Health, 25, 339-349.
75.
RimalR. N. (2001). Perceived risk and self-efficacy as motivators: Understanding individuals’ long-term use of health information. Journal of Communication, 5, 633-654.
76.
RobertoA. J. (2004). Putting communication theory into practice: The extended parallel process model. Communication Teacher, 18, 38-43.
77.
RogersR. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In CacioppoJ.PettyR. (Eds.), Social psychophysiology (pp. 153-176). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
78.
RothmanA. J.BartelsR. D.WlaschinJ.SaloveyP. (2006). The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56, 202-220.
79.
RothmanA. J.SaloveyP. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3-19.
80.
RothmanA. J.SaloveyP. (2007). The reciprocal relation between principles and practice: Social psychology and health behavior. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 826-849). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
81.
SaloveyP.SchneiderT. R.ApanovitchA. M. (2002). Message framing in the prevention and early detection of illness. In DillardJ. P.PfauM. (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Theory and practice (pp. 391-406). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
82.
ShenL.DillardJ. P. (2007). The influence of behavioral inhibition/approach systems and message framing on the processing of persuasive health messages. Communication Research, 34, 433-467.
83.
SmithS. W.RosenmanK. D.KotowskiM. R.GlazerE.McFetersC.KeeseckerN. M.LawA. (2008). Using the EPPM to create and evaluate the effectiveness of brochures to increase the use of hearing protection in farmers and landscape workers. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 200-218.
84.
StanleyM. A.MadduxJ. E. (1986). Cognitive processes in health enhancement: Investigation of a combined protection motivation and self-efficacy model. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 101-113.
85.
Struckman-JohnsonC. J.GillilandR. C.Struckman-JohnsonD. L.NorthT. C. (1990). The effects of fear of AIDS and gender on responses to fear-arousing condom advertisements. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1396-1410.
86.
TannerJ. F.Jr.HuntJ. B.EpprightD. R. (1991). The protection motivation model: A normative model of fear appeals. Journal of Marketing, 55, 36-45.
87.
TayR.WatsonB. (2002). Changing drivers’ intentions and behaviors using fear-based driver fatigue advertisements. Health Marketing Quarterly, 19, 55-68.
88.
TsaiW. C.ChenC. C.LiuH. L. (2007). Test of a model linking employee positive moods and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1570-1583.
89.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
90.
van PeerW.HakemulderJ.HakemulderF.ZyngierS. (2012). Scientific methods for the humanities. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
91.
WilsonS. R.AlemanC. G.LeathamG. B. (1998). Identity implications of influence goals: A revised analysis of face-threatening acts and application to seeking compliance with same-sex friends. Human Communication Research, 25, 64-96.
92.
WitteK. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs, 59, 329-349.
93.
WitteK. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communications Monographs, 61, 113-134.
94.
WitteK. (1998). Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: Using the extended parallel process model to explain fear appeal successes and failures. In AndersenP. A.GuerreroL. K. (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts (pp. 423-450). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
95.
WitteK.AllenM. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 591-615.
96.
WitteK.CameronK. A.McKeonJ. K.BerkowitzJ. M. (1996). Predicting risk behaviors: Development and validation of a diagnostic scale. Journal of Health Communication, 1, 317-342.
