People often need to dodge questions. Politicians presumably are the worst offenders. Two recent theories of deception make assertions applicable to politicians dodging questions: information manipulation theory 2 and truth-default theory. We examine both in two experiments. We constructed news interviews with a politician dodging questions. Results indicate people detect particular types of dodges and dodging impairs trustworthiness. But detection also depends on the strength of political attitudes. Furthermore, personality trait suspicion moderates perceptions of trustworthiness. We also extend theorizing and suggest dodges are detected because of rumination triggered by topic avoidance. Discussion includes ramifications for political engagement when the public perception of politicians “always” dodging questions is supported by extensive cognitive mechanisms.
AbramowitzA. I. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
2.
AfifiT.AfifiW.MerrillA. F.DenesA.DavisS. (2013). “You need to stop talking about this!” Verbal rumination and the costs of social support. Human Communication Research, 39, 395-421.
3.
AfifiT.CaughlinJ.AfifiW. (2007). The dark side (and light side) of avoidance and secrets. In SpitzbergB. H.CupachW. R. (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 61-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
AfifiT. D.AfifiW. A.MorseC. R.HamrickK. (2008). Adolescents’ avoidance tendencies and physiological reactions to discussions about their parents’ relationship: Postdivorce and nondivorced families. Communication Monographs, 75, 290-317.
5.
BavelasJ. B.BlackA.ChovilN.MullettJ. (1990). Equivocal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
BullP. (1998). Equivocation theory and news interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 36-51.
7.
BullP. (2008). “Slipperiness, evasion, and ambiguity”: Equivocation and facework in noncommittal political discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 333-344.
8.
BullP.MayerK. (1993). How not to answer questions in political interviews. Political Psychology, 14, 651-666.
9.
ClementsonD. E. (2016). Why do we think politicians are so evasive? Insight from theories of equivocation and deception, with a content analysis of U.S. presidential debates, 1996-2012. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35, 247-267.
10.
ClementsonD. E.EvelandW. P.Jr. (2016). When politicians dodge questions: An analysis of presidential press conferences and debates. Mass Communication and Society, 19, 411-429.
11.
DanceyL.GorenP. (2010). Party identification, issue attitudes, and the dynamics of political debate. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 686-699.
12.
DennisJ. (1988). Political independence in America, part II: Towards a theory. British Journal of Political Science, 18, 197-219.
13.
DensonT. F.SpanovicM.MillerN. (2009). Cognitive appraisals and emotions predict cortisol and immune responses: A meta-analysis of acute laboratory social stressors and emotion inductions. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 823-853.
14.
DewanT.MyattD. P. (2008). The qualities of leadership: Direction, communication, and obfuscation. American Political Science Review, 102, 351-368.
15.
Donovan-KickenE.GuinnT. D.RomoL. K.CiceraroL. D. L. (2013). Thanks for asking, but let’s talk about something else: Reactions to topic-avoidance messages that feature different interaction goals. Communication Research, 40, 308-336.
16.
FeeleyT. H. (2002). Comment on halo effects in rating and evaluation research. Human Communication Research, 28, 578-586.
17.
FiorinaM. P.AbramsS. J.PopeJ. C. (2011). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Longman.
GriceH. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In ColeP.MorganJ. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 43-58). New York, NY: Academic Press.
20.
GriceH. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
21.
HarrisS. (1991). Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews. In ScannellP. (Ed.) Broadcast talk (pp. 76-99). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22.
HarwoodJ. (2014). Easy lies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 405-410.
23.
HayesA. F. (2007). Exploring the forms of self-censorship: On the spiral of silence and the use of opinion expression avoidance strategies. Journal of Communication, 57, 785-802.
24.
HoggM. A. (2006). Social identity theory. In BurkeP. J. (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 111-136). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
KeyV. O.Jr. (1958). Politics, parties, and pressure groups (4th ed.). New York, NY: Crowell.
26.
KimR. K.LevineT. R. (2011). The effect of suspicion on deception detection accuracy: Optimal level or opposing effects?Communication Reports, 24, 51-62.
27.
KinderD. R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 778-867). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
LevineT. R. (2014). Truth-Default Theory (TDT): A theory of human deception and deception detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 378-392.
29.
LevineT. R.McCornackS. A. (1991). The dark side of trust: Conceptualizing and measuring types of communicative suspicion. Communication Quarterly, 39, 325-340.
30.
LevineT. R.ParkH. S.McCornackS. A. (1999). Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the “veracity effect.”Communication Monographs, 66, 125-144.
31.
LevineT. R.SerotaK. B.ShulmanH.ClareD. D.ParkH. S.ShawA. S.. . . LeeJ. H. (2011). Sender demeanor: Individual differences in sender believability have a powerful impact on deception detection judgments. Human Communication Research, 37, 377-403.
32.
McCannJ. A.LawsonC. (2003). An electorate adrift? Public opinion and the quality of democracy in Mexico. Latin American Research Review, 38, 60-81.
33.
McCornackS. A. (1992). Information manipulation theory. Communication Monographs, 59, 1-16.
34.
McCornackS. A.LevineT. R. (1990). When lovers become leery: The relationship between suspicion and accuracy in detecting deception. Communication Monographs, 57, 219-230.
35.
McCornackS. A.MorrisonK.PaikJ. E.WisnerA. M.ZhuX. (2014). Information Manipulation Theory 2: A propositional theory of deceptive discourse production. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 348-377.
36.
McCroskeyJ. C.TevenJ. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66, 90-103.
37.
McGeeD. S.CegalaD. J. (1998). Patient communication skills training for improved communication competence in the primary care. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 412-430.
38.
MoreyA. C.EvelandW. P.Jr.HutchensM. J. (2012). The “who” matters: Types of interpersonal relationships and avoidance of political disagreement. Political Communication, 29, 86-103.
39.
PennebakerJ. W. (1995). Emotion, disclosure, and health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
RogersT.NortonM. I. (2011). The artful dodger: Answering the wrong question the right way. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 139-147.
42.
SamovarL. A. (1962). Ambiguity and unequivocation in the Kennedy-Nixon television debates. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 48, 277-279.
43.
SerotaK. B.LevineT. R.BosterF. J. (2010). The prevalence of lying in America: Three studies of self-reported lies. Human Communication Research, 36, 2-25.
44.
StilesW. B.ShusterP. L.HarriganJ. A. (1992). Disclosure and anxiety: A test of the fever model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 980-988.
45.
SwannW. B.GiulianoT.WegnerD. M. (1982). Where leading questions can lead: The power of conjecture in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1025-1035.
46.
TurnerR. E.EdgleyC.OlmsteadG. (1975). Information control in conversations: Honesty is not always the best policy. Kansas Journal of Sociology, 11, 69-89.
47.
VerschuereB.ShalviS. (2014). The truth comes naturally! Does it?Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 417-423.
