Ideological liberals may focus on mental operations to a greater extent than bodily operations, whereas this pattern may be reversed among conservatives. Although there are suggestive sources of evidence, prior research has not directly examined relations between political ideology and this mind–body distinction. The present investigation did so by content-coding texts using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count program and its cognitive and bodily process categories. Three studies involving posts to political news websites (Study 1), presidential State of the Union addresses (Study 2), and writing samples by laypersons (Study 3) converged on the hypothesis that texts produced by those with liberal ideologies would score positively in mind–body terms (reflecting a greater relative mental focus), whereas texts produced by those with conservative ideologies would score negatively in mind–body terms (reflecting a greater bodily focus), a novel linguistic signature of political ideology.
AdolphsR. (2004). Emotion, social cognition, and the human brain. In CacioppoJ. T.BerntsonG. G. (Eds.), Essays in social neuroscience (pp. 121-131). Cambridge: MIT Press.
2.
AltemeyerR. A. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality.”Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47-91.
3.
AmodioD. M.JostJ. T.MasterS. L.YeeC. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1246-1247.
4.
AshtonM. C.DansoH. A.MaioG. R.EssesV. M.BondM. H.KeungD. K. I. (2005). Two dimensions of political attitudes and their individual difference correlates: A cross-cultural perspective. In SorrentinoR. M.CohenD.OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Culture and social behavior: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 10, pp. 1-29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
BarneaM. F.SchwartzS. H. (1998). Values and voting. Political Psychology, 19, 17-40.
6.
BendorJ.DiermeierD.SiegelD. A.TingM. M. (2011). A behavioral theory of elections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
BlockJ.BlockJ. H. (2006). Venturing a 30-year longitudinal study. American Psychologist, 61, 315-327.
8.
BloomP. (2004). Descartes’ baby. New York, NY: Basic Books.
9.
BonannoG. A.JostJ. T. (2006). Conservative shift among high-exposure survivors of the September 11th terrorist attacks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 311-323.
10.
BrooksC.NieuwbeertaP.ManzaJ. (2006). Cleavage-based voting behavior in cross-national perspective: Evidence from six postwar democracies. Social Science Research, 35, 88-128.
11.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.FeinsteinJ. A.JarvisW. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
12.
CapraraG. V.SchwartzS.CapannaC.VecchioneM.BarbaranelliC. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27, 1-28.
13.
CarneyD. R.JostJ. T.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807-840.
14.
ChaikenS.TropeY. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
15.
ChirumboloA. (2002). The relationship between need for cognitive closure and political orientation: The mediating role of authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 603-610.
16.
ChunS. (2004). Current status of mind-body medicine as complementary alternative medicine in Korea. Journal of International Society of Life Information Science, 22, 259-265.
17.
ConverseP. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In ApterD. E. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-261). New York, NY: Free Press.
18.
CrowsonH. M. (2009a). Are all conservatives alike? A study of the psychological correlates of cultural and economic conservatism. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 143, 449-463.
19.
CrowsonH. M. (2009b). Does the DOG scale measure dogmatism? Another look at construct validity. Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 265-283.
20.
DescartesR. (1984). Meditations on first philosophy. In CottinghamJ.StoothoffR.MurdochD. (Eds.), The philosophical writings of Descartes (Vol. 2, pp. 3-62). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1641)
21.
DiehlM.OwenS. K.YoungbladeL. M. (2004). Agency and communion attributes in adults’ spontaneous self-representations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 1-15.
22.
EskineK. J.KacinikN. A.PrinzJ. J. (2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, 22, 295-299.
23.
ForstmannM.BurgmerP.MussweilerT. (2012). “The mind is willing, but the flesh is weak”: The effects of mind-body dualism on health behavior. Psychological Science, 23, 1239-1245.
24.
GawronskiB.GaldiS.ArcuriL. (2015). What can political psychology learn from implicit measures? Empirical evidence and new directions. Political Psychology, 36, 1-17.
25.
GeorgeA. L.GeorgeJ. L. (1998). Presidential personality and performance. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
26.
GibbsR. W.Jr. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046.
28.
HaidtJ.GrahamJ. (2009). Planet of the Durkheimians, where community, authority, and sacredness are foundations of morality. In JostJ. T.KayA. C.ThorisdottirH. (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 371-401). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29.
HaidtJ.GrahamJ.JosephC. (2009). Above and below left-right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 110-119.
30.
InbarY.PizarroD. A.BloomP. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 714-725.
31.
JamesW. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vols. 1 & 2). London, England: MacMillan.
32.
JostJ. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651-670.
33.
JostJ. T.AmodioD. M. (2012). Political ideology as motivated social cognition: Behavioral and neuroscientific evidence. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 55-64.
34.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
35.
JostJ. T.NosekB. A.GoslingS. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126-136.
36.
KemmelmeierM.BurnsteinE.KrumovK.GenkovaP.KanagawaC.HirshbergM. S.. . . NoelsK. A. (2003). Individualism, collectivism, and authoritarianism in seven societies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 304-322.
37.
KerlingerF. N. (1984). Liberalism and conservatism: The nature and structure of social attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
KlingerE. (1995). Effects of motivation and emotion on thought flow and cognition: Assessment and findings. In ShroutP. E.FiskeS. T. (Eds.), Personality research, methods, and theory: A festschrift honoring Donald W. Fiske (pp. 257-270). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
KruglanskiA. W.FishmanS. (2009). The need for cognitive closure. In LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 343-353). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
41.
LambieJ. A.MarcelA. J. (2002). Consciousness and the varieties of emotion experience: A theoretical framework. Psychological Review, 109, 219-259.
42.
LevenduskyM. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became Democrats and conservatives became Republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
LipsetS. (1960). Political man. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
44.
LyonsW. (1999). The philosophy of cognition and emotion. In DalgleishT.PowerM. J. (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 21-44). New York, NY: John Wiley.
45.
MandlerG. (1999). Emotion. In BlyB. M.RumelhartD. E. (Eds.), Cognitive science (pp. 367-384). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
46.
MartindaleC. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic change. New York, NY: Basic Books.
47.
MaslowA. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
48.
McAdamsD. P.AlbaughM.FarberE.DanielsJ.LoganR. L.OlsonB. (2008). Family metaphors and moral intuitions: How conservatives and liberals narrate their lives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 978-990.
49.
McClellandD. C. (1951). Personality. New York, NY: William Sloane.
50.
McClellandD. C. (1987). Human motivation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
51.
McClellandD. C.KoestnerR.WeinbergerJ. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ?Psychological Review, 96, 690-702.
52.
McCraeR. R.SutinA. R. (2009). Openness to experience. In LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 257-273). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
53.
NassiA. J.AbramowitzS. I.YoumansJ. E. (1983). Moral development and politics a decade later: A replication and extension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1127-1135.
54.
NewmanM. L.GroomC. J.HandelmanL. D.PennebakerJ. W. (2008). Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, 45, 211-236.
55.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
56.
PengY.JiangB.YangX. (2011). No-self: The psychological analysis of self-view in Buddhism. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43, 213-220.
57.
PennebakerJ. W.BoothR. J.FrancisM. E. (2007). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC [Computer software]. Austin, TX: LIWC.net.
58.
PennebakerJ. W.ChungC. K.IrelandM.GonzalesA.BoothR. J. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of the LIWC2007 [LIWC manual]. Austin, TX: LIWC.net.
59.
PennebakerJ. W.FrancisM. E. (1996). Cognitive, emotional, and language processes in disclosure. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 601-626.
60.
PennebakerJ. W.FrancisM. E.BoothR. J. (2001). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61.
PennebakerJ. W.KingL. A. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1296-1312.
62.
PennebakerJ. W.MayneT. J.FrancisM. E. (1997). Linguistic predictors of adaptive bereavement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 863-871.
63.
PennebakerJ. W.MehlM. R.NiederhofferK. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547-577.
64.
PennebakerJ. W.SlatcherR. B.ChungC. K. (2005). Linguistic markers of psychological state through media interviews: John Kerry and John Edwards in 2004, Al Gore in 2000. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5, 197-204.
65.
PetersonB.SmithJ. A.TannenbaumD.ShawM. P. (2009). On the “exporting” of morality: Its relation to political conservatism and epistemic motivation. Social Justice Research, 22, 206-230.
66.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
67.
RobinsonM. D.SedikidesC. (2009). Traits and the self: Toward an integration. In CorrP. J.MatthewsG. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 457-472). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
68.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
69.
RozinP.RoyzmanE. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296-320.
70.
SharmaC. (1997). A critical survey of Indian philosophy. Delhi, India: Motilal Banarsidass.
71.
SkitkaL. J.MullenE.GriffinT.HutchinsonS.ChamberlinB. (2002). Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 470-487.
72.
SlatcherR. B.ChungC. K.PennebakerJ. W.StoneL. D. (2007). Winning words: Individual differences in linguistic style among U.S. presidential and vice presidential candidates. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 63-75.
73.
SlingerlandE.ChudekM. (2011). The prevalence of mind-body dualism in early China. Cognitive Science, 35, 997-1007.
74.
SpiegelD. (1994). Dissociation: Culture, mind, and body. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.
75.
StirmanS. W.PennebakerJ. W. (2001). Word use in the poetry of suicidal and nonsuicidal poets. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63, 517-522.
76.
StoneP. J.DunphyD. C.SmithM. S.OgilvieD. M. (1966). The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
77.
StrozierC. B.SwiderskiK. (2005). The psychology and theocracy of George W. Bush. Journal of Psychohistory, 33, 102-116.
78.
SwanT. (2009). Metaphors of body and mind in the history of English. English Studies, 90, 460-475.
79.
TausczikY. R.PennebakerJ. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24-54.
80.
TetlockP. E. (1983). Cognitive style and political ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 118-126.
81.
ThoemmesF. J.ConwayL. G.III. (2007). Integrative complexity of 41 U.S. presidents. Political Psychology, 28, 193-226.
82.
ThorsonK.WatsonB. (2007). The new online campaign: Translating information into action. In SchumannD. W.ThorsonE. (Eds.), Internet advertising theory and research (pp. 323-342). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
83.
TranelD. (2002). Emotion, decision making, and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. In StussD. T.KnightR. T. (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function (pp. 338-352). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
84.
TriandisH. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
85.
Van HielA.KossowskaM.MervieldeI. (2000). The relationship between openness to experience and political ideology. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 741-751.
86.
Van LeeuwenF.ParkJ. H. (2009). Perceptions of social dangers, moral foundations, and political orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 169-173.
87.
WatsonG.BatchelorS.ClaxtonG. (2000). The psychology of awakening: Buddhism, science, and our day-to-day lives. York Beach, ME: Samuel Weiser.
88.
WinterD. G. (1993). Power, affiliation, and war: Three tests of a motivational model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 532-545.
