This study content analyzed all print newspaper articles addressing U.S. immigration from Mexico appearing in Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas during a 1-year period for presence of linguistic intergroup bias. Across all four states, negative statements outnumbered positive statements; this negativity bias was more pronounced for out-group than in-group statements in all states except California. Consistent with the linguistic intergroup bias, positive in-group and negative out-group statements were encoded using more abstract language than negative in-group and positive out-group statements.
AnolliL.ZurloniV.RivaG. (2006). Linguistic intergroup bias in political communication. Journal of General Psychology, 133, 237-255.
2.
AssilaméhouY.TestéB. (2013). The effects of linguistic abstraction on evaluations of the speaker in an intergroup context: Using the linguistic intergroup bias makes you a good group member. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 113-119.
3.
CarnaghiA.MaassA.GrestaS.BianchiM.CadinuM.ArcuriL. (2008). Nomina Sunt Omina: On the inductive potential of nouns and adjectives in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 839-859.
4.
CoenenL. H. M.HedebouwL.SeminG. R. (2006). Measuring language abstraction: The Linguistic Category Model (LCM) manual. Unpublished manuscript, Free University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
5.
DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M.WilkinK. (2008). Could you mind your language? An investigation of communicators’ ability to inhibit linguistic bias. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 123-139.
6.
FrancoF. M.MaassA. (1996). Strategies of out-group discrimination: The role of intentional control in biases language use and reward allocation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 335-359.
7.
GeschkeD.SassenbergK.RuhrmannG.SommerD. (2010). Effects of linguistic abstractness in the mass media: How newspaper articles shape readers’ attitudes toward migrants. Journal of Media Psychology, 22, 99-104.
8.
GrafS.BilewiczM.FinellE.GeschkeD. (2012). Nouns cut slices: Effects of linguistic forms on intergroup bias. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 62-83.
9.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046.
10.
HewstoneM.JasparsJ. (1984). Social dimensions of attribution. In TajfelH. (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 379-404). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11.
HowardJ.RothbartM. (1980). Social categorization and memory for in-group and out group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 301-310.
12.
KrippendorffK. (2004). Reliability in content analysis. Human Communication Research, 30, 411-433.
13.
MaassA. (1999). Linguistic intergroup bias: Stereotype perpetuation through language. In ZannaM. P (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 79-121). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14.
MaassA.CeccarelliR.RudinS. (1996). Linguistic intergroup bias: Evidence for in-group-protective motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 512-526.
15.
MaassA.CorvinoG.ArcuriL. (1994). Linguistic intergroup bias and the mass media. Revue de Psychologie Sociale, 1, 31-43.
16.
MaassA.MilesiA.ZabbiniS.StahlbergD. (1995). Linguistic intergroup bias: Differential expectancies or in-group protection?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 116-126.
17.
MaassA.SalviD.ArcuriL.SeminG. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981-993.
18.
MastroD.TukachinskyR.Behm-MorawitzE.BlechaE. (2014). News coverage of immigration: The influence of exposure to linguistic bias in the news on consumer’s racial/ethnic cognition. Communication Quarterly, 62, 135-154.
19.
MillerG.SchofieldN. (2008). The transformation of the Republican and Democratic party coalitions in the US. Perspectives on Politics, 6, 433-450.
SegoviaF.DeFeverR. (2010). American public opinion on immigrants and immigration policy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 375-394.
23.
SeminG.FiedlerK. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social functions and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558-568.
24.
ShahD. V.McLeodD. M.GotliebM. R.LeeN. J. (2009). Framing and agenda setting. In OliverM. B.NabiR. L. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 83-98). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
SuttonR. M.DouglasK. M. (Eds.). (2008). Celebrating two decades of linguistic bias research [Special anniversary issue]. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 105-109.
26.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
27.
TewksburyD.JonesJ.PeskeM.RaymondA.VigW. (2000). The interaction of news and advocate frames: Manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 804-829.
28.
ValenicaJ. F.de MontesL. G.OrtizG.LarrañagaM. (2011). Normative regulations and the use of language in describing political events: An analysis of the pragmatic use of language on newspapers. Quaderns de Psicologia, 13, 19-33.
29.
ValkenburgP.SemetkoH.DeVreeseC. (1999). The effects of news frames on readers’ thoughts and recall. Communication Research, 26, 550-569.
30.
WatsonB.GalloisC. (2002). Patients’ interactions with health providers: A linguistic category model approach. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 32-52.
31.
WerkmanW. M.WigboldusD. H. J.SeminG. R. (1999). Children’s communication of the linguistic intergroup bias and its impact upon cognitive inferences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 95-104.
32.
WigboldusD. H. J.SeminG. R.SpearsR. (2000). How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic bases and inferential consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 5-18.
33.
WigboldusD. H. J.SeminG. R.SpearsR. (2006). Communicating expectancies about others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 815-824.
