I discuss the contribution of the articles to existing literatures, and their implications for (1) our understanding of the analytic tractability of -isms, and (2) managing and challenging -isms.
RoblesJ. S. (2015). Extreme case (re)formulation as a practice for making hearably racist talk repairable. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34, 389-408.
4.
SchegloffE. A. (1996a). Confirming allusions: Towards an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 161-216.
5.
SchegloffE. A. (1996b). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In OchsE.ThompsonS. A.SchegloffE. A. (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52-133). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
SpeerS. A. (2002). Sexist talk: Gender categories, participants’ orientations and irony. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6, 347-377.
8.
SpeerS. A. (2005). Gender talk: Feminism, discourse and conversation analysis. London, England: Routledge.
9.
SpeerS. A.PotterJ. (2000). The management of heterosexist talk: Conversational resources and prejudiced claims. Discourse & Society, 11, 543-572.
10.
SpeerS. A.StokoeE. (Eds.). (2011). Conversation and gender. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11.
StokoeE. (2015). Identifying and responding to possible -isms in institutional encounters: Alignment, impartiality and the implications for communication training. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34, 426-444.
12.
WeatherallA. (2015). Sexism in Language and Talk-in-Interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34, 409-425.
13.
WhiteheadK. A. (2015). Everyday Antiracism in Action: Preference Organization in Responses to Racism. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34, 373-388.
14.
WhiteheadK. A.StokoeE. (2015). Producing and Responding to -isms in Interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34, 367-372.
