Purpose: We investigate the role of pronoun use in people’s perceptions of relationship interaction quality, especially when partners experience worry. Method: Couples (N = 115) rated their anxiety and interaction quality and participated in a 15-minute problem-solving discussion. Results:Me-focus by actors and You-focus by actors and partners reliably correlated with perceived interaction quality. As well, a person’s own, but not his or her partner’s, worry moderated the association between pronoun use and perceived interaction quality. Pronoun use (actor You- and partner Me-focus) and perceived interaction quality were especially strongly associated for people with relatively lower levels of worry. A principal component analyses uncovered two underlying factors for pronouns: self-focus and other-focus. Actor–partner analyses using underlying factors corroborated the results for individual pronouns. Discussion: These results support previous findings that specific pronouns are related to worse outcomes, and this association may be a function of how worried partners are. Worry may contribute to interpersonal difficulties by overriding otherwise salient interpersonal cues.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
AlbanL.GromanW. (1976). Neurotic anxiety, pronoun usage and stress. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 393-399.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
4.
BazarovaN. N.TaftJ. G.ChoiY. H.CosleyD. (2013). Managing impressions and relationships on Facebook: Self-presentational and relational concerns revealed through the analysis of language style. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 121-141.
5.
BeckJ.StanleyM.ZebbB. (1995). Psychometric properties of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire in older adults. Journal of Clinical Geropsychology, 1, 33-42.
6.
BeharE.AlcaineO.ZuelligA. R.BorkovecT. D. (2003). Screening for generalized anxiety disorder using the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: A receiver operating characteristic analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 34, 25-43.
7.
BienvenuM. J. (1970). Measurement of marital communication. The Family Coordinator, 19, 26-31.
8.
BienvenuM. J. (1975). A measurement of premarital communication. The Family Coordinator, 24, 65-68.
9.
BlackburnK.BrodyN.LeFebvreL. (2014). The I’s, we’s, and she/he’s of breakups: Public and private pronoun usage in relationship dissolution accounts. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 202-213.
10.
BoalsA.KleinK. (2005). Word use in emotional narratives about failed romantic relationships and subsequent mental health. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 252-268.
11.
BorkovecT.NewmanM.PincusA.LytleR. (2002). A component analysis of cognitive-behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder and the role of interpersonal problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 288-298.
12.
BucciW.FreedmanN. (1981). The language of depression. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 45, 334-358.
13.
BuehlmanK. T.GottmanJ. M.KatzL. F. (1992). How a couple views their past predicts their future: Predicting divorce from an oral history interview. Journal of Family Psychology, 5, 295-318.
14.
ChelminskiI.ZimmermanM. (2003). Pathological worry in depressed and anxious patients. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 17, 533-546.
15.
ChungC.PennebakerJ. (2007). The psychological functions of function words. In KruglanskiA. E.ForgasJ. P. (Series Eds.) & FiedlerK. (Vol. Ed.), Social communication (pp. 343-359). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
16.
CraskeM.BurtonT.BarlowD. (1989). Relationships among measures of communication, marital satisfaction and exposure during couples treatment of agoraphobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27, 131-140.
17.
DehleC.WeissR. (2002). Associations between anxiety and marital adjustment. Journal of Psychology, 136, 328-38.
18.
DuttonS. S. (2002). Marital relationship functioning in a clinical sample of generalized anxiety disorder clients. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 4216B.
19.
EngW.HeimbergR. G. (2006). Interpersonal correlates of generalized anxiety disorder: Self versus other perception. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 20, 380-387.
20.
EricksonT. M.NewmanM. G. (2007). Interpersonal and emotional processes in generalized anxiety disorder analogues during social interaction tasks. Behavior Therapy, 38, 364-377.
21.
FitzsimonsG. M.KayA. C. (2004). Language and interpersonal cognition: Causal effects of variations in pronoun usage on perceptions of closeness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 547-57.
22.
FreestonM. H.PléchatyM. (1997). Reconsideration of the Locke-Wallace marital adjustment test: Is it still relevant for the 1990s?Psychological Reports, 81, 419-434.
23.
FrescoD. M.MenninD. S.HeimbergR. G.TurkC. L. (2003). Using the Penn State Worry Questionnaire to identify individuals with generalized anxiety disorder: A receiver operating characteristic analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 34, 283-291.
24.
FrostD. M. (2013). The narrative construction of intimacy and affect in relationship stories: Implications for relationship quality, stability, and mental health. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 247-269.
25.
GinsbergB.VogelsongE. L. (1977). Premarital relationship improvement by maximizing empathy and self-disclosure: The PRIMES Program. In GuerneyB. G.Jr. (Ed.), Relationship enhancement: Skill-training programs for therapy, problem prevention, and enrichment (pp. 268-288). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26.
HahlwegK.RevenstorfD.SchindlerL. (1984). Effects of behavioral marital therapy on couples’ communication and problem-solving skills. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 553-566.
27.
HalfordW. K.BoumaR.KellyA.YoungR. M. (1999). Individual psychopathology and marital distress: Analyzing the association and implications for therapy. Behavior Modification, 23, 179-216.
28.
HartleyJ.PennebakerJ.FoxC. (2003). Using new technology to assess the academic writing styles of male and female pairs and individuals. Journal of Technical Writing & Communication, 33, 243-261.
29.
HerzogM. J.CooneyT. M. (2002). Parental divorce and perceptions of past interparental conflict: Influences on the communication of young adults. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 36, 89-109.
30.
HickeyD.CarrA.DooleyB.GuerinS.ButlerE.FitzpatrickL. (2005). Family and marital profiles of couples in which one partner has depression or anxiety. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 171-182.
31.
HopeS.RodgersB.PowerC. (1999). Marital status transitions and psychological distress: Longitudinal evidence from a national population sample. Psychological Medicine, 29, 381-389.
32.
IckesW.ReidheadS.PattersonM. (1986). Machiavellianism and self-monitoring: As different as “me” and “you.”Social Cognition, 4, 58-74.
33.
JunghaenelD.SmythJ.SantnerL. (2008). Linguistic dimensions of psychopathology: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27, 36-55.
34.
KacewiczE.PennebakerJ. W.DavisM.JeonM.GraesserA. C. (2014). Pronoun use reflects standings in social hierarchies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 125-143.
35.
KashyD.KennyD. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In ReisH.JuddC. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 451-477). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36.
KennyD.KashyD.CookW. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
37.
LockeH. J.WallaceK. M. (1959). Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 2, 251-255.
38.
McLeodJ. (1994). Anxiety disorders and marital quality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 767-776.
39.
MehlM. R.GoslingS. D.PennebakerJ. W. (2006). Personality in its natural habitat: Manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 862-77.
40.
MenninD. S.HeimbergR. G.TurkC. L.FrescoD. M. (2005). Preliminary evidence for an emotion dysregulation model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1281-1310.
41.
MeyerT. J.MillerM. L.MetzgerR. L.BorkovecT. D. (1990). Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 487-495.
42.
MinekaS.WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1998). Comorbidity of anxiety and unipolar mood disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 377-412.
43.
MorN.WinquistJ. (2002). Self-focused attention and negative affect: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 638-662.
44.
NavranL. (1967). Communication and adjustment in marriage. Family Process, 6, 173-184.
45.
NewmanM. G.EricksonT. M. (2010). Generalized anxiety disorder. In BeckJ. G. (Ed.), Interpersonal process in the anxiety disorders: Implications for understanding psychopathology and treatment (pp. 235-259). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
46.
NewmanM. L.PennebakerJ. W.BerryD. S.RichardsJ. M. (2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 665-675.
47.
PallesenS.NordhusI.CarlstedtB.ThayerJ.JohnsenT. (2006). A Norwegian adaptation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Factor structure, reliability, validity and norms. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47, 281-291.
48.
PennebakerJ. W.ChungC. K.IrelandM.GonzalesA. L.BoothR. J. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. Retrieved from http://www.liwc.net
49.
PennebakerJ. W.StoneL. D. (2003). Words of wisdom: Language use over the life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 291-301.
50.
PinoC. (1982). Development and assessment of personalized programs for marriage preparation and enrichment. Family Perspective, 16, 33-39.
51.
PreacherK.CurranP.BauerD. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448.
52.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S.CheongY. F.CongdonR. T. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
53.
RichardsC. S.O’HaraM. W. (2014). The Oxford handbook of depression and comorbidity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
54.
RobbinsM. L.MehlM. R.SmithH. L.WeihsK. L. (2013). Linguistic indicators of patient, couple, and family adjustment following breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 22, 1501-1508.
55.
RobinsonR. L.NaveaR.IckesW. (2013). Predicting final course performance from students’ written self-introductions: A LIWC analysis. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 469-479.
56.
RohrbaughM. J.ShohamV.SkoyenJ. A.JensenM.MehlM. R. (2012). We-talk, communal coping, and cessation success in a couple-focused intervention for health-compromised smokers. Family Process, 51, 107-121.
57.
RudeS. S.GortnerE.PennebakerJ. W. (2004). Language use of depressed and depression-vulnerable college students. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 1121-1133.
58.
SchleinS. (1971). Training dating couples in empathic and open communication: An experimental evaluation of a potential preventive mental health program (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
59.
SchweinleW.IckesW.RollingsK.JacquotC. (2010). Maritally aggressive men: Angry, egocentric, impulsive, and/or biased. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 399-424.
60.
SeiderB. H.HirschbergerG.NelsonK. L.LevensonR. W. (2009). We can work it out: Age differences in relational pronouns, physiology, and behavior in marital conflict. Psychology and Aging, 24, 604-613
61.
SextonJ.HelmreichR. L. (2000). Analyzing cockpit communications: The links between language, performance, error, and workload. Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 5, 63-68.
SillarsA.ShellenW.McIntoshA.PomegranateM. (1997). Relational characteristics of language: Elaboration and differentiation in marital conversations. Western Journal of Communication, 61, 403-422.
64.
SimmonsR. A.ChamblessD. L.GordonP. C. (2008). How do hostile and emotionally overinvolved relatives view relationships? What relatives’ pronoun use tells us. Family Process, 47, 405-419.
65.
SimmonsR. A.GordonP. C.ChamblessD. L. (2005). Pronouns in marital interaction: What do “you” and “I” say about marital health?Psychological Science, 16, 932-936.
66.
SlatcherR. B.VazireS.PennebakerJ. W. (2008). Am “I” more important than “We”? Couples’ word use in instant messages. Personal Relationships, 15, 407-424.
67.
StirmanS.PennebakerJ. W. (2001). Word use in the poetry of suicidal and nonsuicidal poets. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63, 517-522.
68.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon.
69.
TausczikY. R.PennebakerJ. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24-54.
70.
WhismanM. A. (2007). Marital distress and DSM-IV psychiatric disorders in a population-based national survey. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 638-643.
71.
Williams-BaucomK. J.AtkinsD. C.SevierM.EldridgeK. A.ChristensenA. (2010). “You” and “I” need to talk about “us”: Linguistic patterns in marital interactions. Personal Relationships, 17, 41-56.
72.
WolfM.TheisF.KordyH. (2013). Language use in eating disorder blogs: Psychological implications of social online activity. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 212-226.
73.
ZaiderT. I.HeimbergR. G.IidaM. (2010). Anxiety disorders and intimate relationships: A study of daily processes in couples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 163-73.
74.
ZimmermannJ.WolfM.BockA.PehamD.BeneckeC. (2013). The way we refer to ourselves reflects how we relate to others: Associations between first-person pronoun use and interpersonal problems. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 218-225.
