In today’s multitasking workplace, conversations are often carried out amid other tasks. This article explores how multitasking affects people’s levels of involvement or engagement in their conversations, and how levels of involvement in turn influence people’s language, understanding, and affective responses to the conversation. We manipulated participants’ levels of involvement in instant messaging conversations using a distraction task (an online game). We found that the distraction task lowered communication involvement. In addition, higher levels of involvement (both of the participant and of the partner) had a positive effect on understanding, emotions, and satisfaction. Moreover, a partner’s verbal cues of involvement, such as assent words and definite articles, influenced participants’ communication outcomes. We conclude by suggesting design features that might allow people to maintain appropriate levels of involvement during instant messaging conversations.
AokiP.SzymanskiM.PlurkowskiL.ThorntonJ.WoodruffA.YiW. (2006). Where’s the “party” in “multi-party”? Analyzing the structure of small-group sociable talk. CSCW ‘06: Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 393-402.
2.
AvrahamiD.FussellS. R.HudsonS. E. (2008). IM waiting: Timing and responsiveness in semi-synchronous communication. CSCW ‘08: Proceedings of the 2008 21th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12, 285-294.
3.
AvrahamiD.HudsonS. (2004). QnA: Augmenting an instant messaging client to balance user responsiveness and performance. CSCW ‘04: Proceedings of the 2004 19th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 10, 515-518.
4.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5.
BergstromT.KarahaliosK. (2007). Seeing more: visualizing audio cues. INTERACT 2007: Proceedings of the 11th IFIP TC.13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 29-42.
6.
BurgoonJ. K.BonitoJ. A.BengtssonB.RamirezA.Jr.DunbarN. E.MiczoN. (2000). Testing the interactivity model: Communication processes, partner assessments, and the quality of collaborative work. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 33-56.
7.
BurgoonJ. K.HaleJ. L. (1984). The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 193-214.
8.
BurgoonJ. K.Le PoireB. (1999). Nonverbal cues and interpersonal judgments: Participants and observer perceptions of intimacy, dominance, composure, and formality. Communication Monographs, 66, 105-124.
9.
CamdenC.VerbaS. (1986). Communication and consciousness: Applications in marketing. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 50, 64-73.
10.
CappellaJ. N. (1983). Conversational involvement: Approaching and avoiding others. In WiemannJ. M.HarrisonR. P. (Eds.), Nonverbal interaction (pp. 113-148). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
CegalaD. J. (1981). Interaction involvement: A cognitive dimension of communicative competence. Communication Education, 30, 109-121.
12.
CegalaD. J. (1984). Affective and cognitive manifestation of interaction involvement during unstructured and competitive interactions. Communication Monographs, 51, 320-337.
13.
CegalaD. J. (1989). A study of selected linguistic components of involvement in interaction. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 311-326.
14.
ClarkH. H. (2004). Pragmatics of language performance. In HornL. R.WardG. (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 365-382). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
15.
ClarkH. H.BrennanS. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In ResnickL. B.LevineR. M.TeasleyS. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
CokerD. A.BurgoonJ. K. (1987). The nature of conversational involvement and non-verbal encoding patterns. Human Communication Research, 13(4), 463-494.
17.
ConvertinoG.MentisH.RossonM. B.CarrollJ.SlavkovicA.GanoeC. (2008). Articulating common ground in cooperative work: Content and process. CHI ‘08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 27(1), 1637-1646.
18.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1988). The flow experience and its significant for human psychology. In CsikszentmihalyiM.SelegaI. (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 15-35). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19.
CzerwinskiM.HorvitzE.WilhiteS. (2004). A diary study of task switching and interruptions. CHI ‘04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 23(1), 175-182.
20.
GergleD.MillenD.KrautR.FussellS. (2004). Persistence matters: Making the most of chat in tightly-coupled work. CHI ‘04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 23(1), 431-438.
21.
GonzalezV. M.MarkG. (2004). “Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness”: Managing multiple working spheres. CHI ‘04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 23(1), 113-120.
22.
GuerreroL. K.BurgoonJ. K. (1996). Attachment styles and reactions to nonverbal involvement change in romantic dyads: Patterns of reciprocity and compensation. Human Communication Research, 22, 335-370.
23.
GuilloryJ.SpiegelJ.DrislaneM.WeissB.DonnerW.HancockJ. (2011). Upset now? Emotion contagion in distributed groups. CHI ‘11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 30(1), 745-748.
24.
HancockJ. T.GeeK.CiaccioK.LinJ. M. (2008). I’m sad you’re sad: Emotion contagion in CMC. CSCW ‘08: Proceedings of the 2008 21th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12, 295-298.
25.
JungM. F.LeeJ. J.DePalmaN.AdalgeirssonS. O.HindsP. J.BreazealC. (2013). Engaging robots: Easing complex human-robot teamwork using backchanneling. CSCW ‘13: Proceedings of the 2013 16th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 16(1), 1555-1566.
26.
KalmanY. M.RafaeliS. (2011). Online pauses and silence: Chronemic expectancy violations in written computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 38, 54-69.
27.
KalmanY. M.ScissorsL. E.GillA. J.GergleD. (2013). Online chronemics convey social information. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1260-1269.
28.
KramerA. D.FussellS. R.SetlockL. D. (2004). Text analysis as a tool for analyzing conversation in online support groups. CHI ‘04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 23(1), 1485-1488.
29.
KramerA. D.OhL. M.FussellS. R. (2006). Using linguistic features to measure presence in computer-mediated communication. CHI ‘06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 25(1), 913-916.
30.
KrautR. E.FishR. S.RootR. W.ChalfonteB. L. (1990). Informal communication in organizations: Form, function, and technology. In OskampS.SpacapanS. (Eds.), Human reactions to technology: The Claremont Symposium on applied social psychology (pp. 145-199). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
LeshedG.PerezD.HancockJ.CosleyD.BirnholtzJ.LeeS.. . .GayG. (2009). Visualizing real-time language-based feedback on teamwork behavior in computer-mediated groups. CHI ‘09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 28(1), 537-546.
32.
LinL.RobertsonT.LeeJ. (2009). Reading performances between novices and experts in different media multitasking environments. Computers in the Schools, 26(3), 169-186.
33.
LittellR. C.MillikenG. A.StroupW. W.WolfingerR. (1996). SAS systems for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
34.
MaloneT. W.CrowstonK. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Survey, 26, 87-119.
35.
MarkG.GonzalezV. M.HarrisJ. (2005). No task left behind? Examining the nature of fragmented work. CHI ‘05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 24(1), 321-330.
36.
MyersS. A.BryantL. E. (2002). Perceived understanding, interaction involvement, and college student outcomes. Communication Research Reports, 19, 146-155.
37.
NardiB.WhittakerS.BradnerE. (2000). Interaction and outeraction: Instant messaging in action. CSCW ‘00: Proceedings of the 2000 8th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 79-88.
38.
NguyenD. T.FussellS. R. (2014). Lexical cues of interaction involvement in dyadic instant messaging conversations. Discourse Processes, 51, 468-493.
39.
OfekE.IqbalS.StraussK. (2013). Reducing disruption from subtle information delivery during a conversation: Mode and bandwidth investigation. CHI ‘13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 32(1), 3111-3120.
40.
OphirE.NassC.WagnerA. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583-15587.
41.
OtsukaK.YamatoI.TakemaeY.MuraseH. (2006). Quantifying interpersonal influence in face-to-face conversations based on visual attention patterns. CHI ‘06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 25(1), 1175-1180.
42.
OttL.LongneckerM. T. (2003). A first course in statistical methods (1st ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Thomson.
43.
PattersonM. L. (1983). Nonverbal behavior: A functional perspective. New York, NY: Springer.
44.
PennebakerJ. W. (2011). The secret life of pronouns. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
45.
PennebakerJ. W.FrancisM. E. (1999). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC [Software program for text analysis]. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
PirzadehA.PfaffM. (2012). Expression of emotion in IM. CSCW ‘12: Proceedings of the 2012 15th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15, 199-202.
47.
PrabuD.XuL.SrivastavaJ.KimJ. H. (2013). Media multitasking between two conversational tasks. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1657-1773.
48.
ReinschL.TurnerJ. W.TinsleyC. (2008). Multicommunicating: A practice whose time has come?Academy of Management Review, 33, 391-403.
49.
RomanF.MastrogiacomoS.MlotkowskiD.KaplanF.DillenbourgP. (2012). Can a table regulate participation in top level managers’ meetings?GROUP ‘12: Proceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work, 17, 1-10.
50.
SobelM. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In LeinhartS. (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
51.
VillaumeW. A.CegalaD. J. (1988). Interaction involvement and discourse strategies: The patterned use of cohesive devices in conversation. Communication Monographs, 55, 22-40.
52.
VillaumeW. A.JacksonJ.SchoutenT. G. (1989). Issue-even extensions and interaction involvement: Text-based and meaning-based discourse strategies. Human Communication Research, 15, 407-427.
53.
VoidaA.NewstetterW.MynattE. (2002). When conventions collide: The tensions of instant messaging attributed. CHI ‘02: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 21(1), 187-194.
54.
WaltherJ. B.LohT.GrankaL. (2005). Let me count the ways: The interchange of verbal and nonverbal cues in computer-mediated and face-to-face affinity. Journal of Language and Social Interaction, 24, 36-65.
55.
WaltherJ. B.TidwellL. C. (1995). Nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication, and the effects of chronemics in relational communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 5, 355-378.
56.
WangH.-C.FussellS. R.SetlockL. D. (2009). Cultural difference and adaptation of communication styles in computer-mediated group brainstorming. CHI ‘09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 28(1), 2233-2242.
