The present research addressed for the first time conditions under which linguistic out-group derogation can be hindered by increasing the qualitative and quantitative complexity of out-group members categorization. An analysis was made of the spontaneous language used to describe counterstereotypic versus stereotypic portrayals of Romanians (Study 1) and multiple versus single categorizations of immigrants (Study 2). Results showed that counterstereotypic and multiple categorization of highly discriminated targets decreased the level of abstraction of negative terms used, thus reducing out-group linguistic derogation. Furthermore, multiple versus single categorization effect on linguistic derogation toward immigrants was mediated by individuation of immigrants and moderated by intergroup contact. The implications of the sociocognitive interventions used and intergroup contact in hindering linguistic out-group derogation are discussed.
Al RamiahA.HewstoneM.VociA.CairnsE.HughesJ. (2013). It’s never too late for “us” to meet “them”: Prior intergroup friendships moderate the impact of later intergroup friendships in educational settings. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 57-75.
2.
AlbarelloF.RubiniM. (2012a). Reducing dehumanization outcomes towards Blacks: The role of multiple categorization and of human identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 801-938.
3.
AlbarelloF.RubiniM. (2012b). Se sei una persona umana mi piaci di più [If you are human I like you more: The effects of others’ reduced humanity on social perception]. Psicologia Sociale, 7, 419-428.
4.
AlbarelloF.RubiniM. (2014). The role of reduced humanity in producing linguistic discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0146167214561195
5.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6.
BeukeboomC. J. (2014). Mechanisms of linguistic bias: How words reflect and maintain stereotypic expectancies. Social Cognition and Communication, 31, 313-330.
7.
BiglerR. S.LibenL. S. (1992). Cognitive mechanisms in children’s gender stereotyping: Theoretical and educational implications of a cognitive-based intervention. Child Development, 63, 1351-1363.
8.
BiglerR. S.LibenL. S. (2007). Developmental intergroup theory explaining and reducing children’s social stereotyping and prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 162-166.
9.
BrewerM. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In SrullT. K.WyerR. S.Jr. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
BrownR.HewstoneM. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255-343). New York, NY: Academic Press.
11.
CrispR. J.HewstoneM. (2007). Multiple social categorization. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 163-254). New York, NY: Academic Press.
12.
CrispR. J.HewstoneM.CairnsE. (2001). Multiple identities in Northern Ireland: Hierarchical ordering in the representation of group membership. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 501-514.
13.
CrispR. J.HewstoneM.RubinM. (2001). Does multiple categorization reduce intergroup bias?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 76-89.
14.
CrispR. J.MeleadyR. (2012). Adapting to a multicultural future. Science, 336, 853-855.
15.
CrispR. J.StoneC. H.HallN. R. (2006). Recategorization and subgroup identification: Predicting and preventing threats from common ingroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 230-243.
16.
DaviesK.TroppL. R.AronA.PettigrewT. F.WrightS. C. (2011). Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 332-351.
17.
DaviesK.WrightS. C.AronA.ComeauJ. (2013). Intergroup contact through friendship: Intimacy and norms. In HodsonG.HewstoneM. (Eds.), Advances in intergroup contact (Vol. 316, pp. 200-228). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
18.
EssesV. M.HodsonG.DovidioJ. (2003). Public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: Determinants and policy implications. In BeachC. M.GreenA. G.ReitzJ. G. (Eds.), Canadian immigration policy for the 21st century (pp. 507-535). Montreal, Quebec, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
19.
EssesV. M.JacksonL.ArmstrongT. (1998). Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 699-724.
20.
Eurobarometer. (2012). Discrimination in European Union in 2012 (Publication No. 393). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
21.
FiedlerK. (2008). The implicit meta-theory that has inspired and restricted LCM research: Why some studies were conducted but others not. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 182-196.
22.
FiedlerK. (2014). From intrapsychic to ecological theories in social psychology: Outlines of a functional theory approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 657-670.
23.
FiskeS. T.NeubergS. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York, NY: Academic Press.
24.
FrancoF.MaassA. (1996). Implicit versus explicit strategies of intergroup discrimination: The role of intentional control in biased language use and reward allocation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 335-359.
25.
Garcia-MarquesL.MackieD. M. (1999). The impact of stereotype-incongruent information on perceived group variability and stereotype change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 979-990.
26.
HallN.CrispR. J. (2005). Considering multiple criteria for social categorization can reduce intergroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1435-1444.
27.
HastieR.SchroederC.WeberR. (1990). Creating complex social conjunction categories from simple categories. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 242-247.
28.
HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling (White paper). Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
29.
HewstoneM. (1996). Contact and categorization: Social psychological interventions to change intergroup relations. In MacraeC. N.StangorC.HewstoneM. (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 323-368). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
30.
HigginsE. T. (2000). Social cognition: Learning about what matters in the social world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 3-40.
31.
HowardJ. W.RothbartM. (1980). Social categorization and memory for in-group and out-group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 301-310.
32.
HutterR. R. C.CrispR. J. (2005). The composition of category conjunctions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 647-657.
33.
HutterR. R. C.CrispR. J. (2006). Implications of cognitive busyness for the perception of category conjunctions. Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 253-256.
34.
HutterR. R. C.CrispR. J.HumphreysG. W.WatersG. M.MoffittG. (2009). The dynamics of category conjunctions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 673-686.
35.
HutterR. R. C.WoodC.TurnerR. N. (2013). Individuation moderates impressions of conflicting categories for slower processors. Social Psychology, 44, 239-247.
36.
IslamM. R.HewstoneM. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and outgroup attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700-710.
37.
Italian National Institute of Statistics. (2012). I migranti visti dai cittadini residenti in Italia [The image of immigrants in Italy]. Retrieved from http://www.istat.it/it/archivio/66563
38.
JonesE. E.DavisK. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 220-266). New York, NY: Academic Press.
39.
KawakamiK.DovidioJ. F.MollJ.HermsenS.RussinA. (2000). Just say no (to stereotyping): Effects of training in trait negation on stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 871-888.
40.
KruglanskiA. W. (2001). That “vision thing”: The state of theory in social and personality psychology at the edge of the new millennium. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 871-875.
41.
KundaZ.MillerD. T.ClaireT. (1990). Combining social concepts: The role of causal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 14, 551-577.
42.
MaassA. (1999). Linguistic intergroup bias: Stereotypes-perpetuation through language. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 79-121). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
43.
MaassA.ArcuriL. (1996). Language and stereotyping. In MacraeN.StangorC.HewstoneM. (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 193-226). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
44.
MaassA.CastelliL.ArcuriL. (2000). Measuring prejudice: Implicit versus explicit techniques. In CapozzaD.BrownR. J. (Eds.), Social identity processes: Trends in theory and research (pp. 96-116). London, England: Sage.
45.
MaassA.CorvinoG.ArcuriL. (1994). Linguistic intergroup bias and the mass media. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 1, 31-34.
46.
MaassA.SalviD.ArcuriL.SeminG. R. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981-993.
47.
MenegattiM.RubiniM. (2012). From the individual to the group: The enhancement of linguistic bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 36-40.
48.
MenegattiM.RubiniM. (2013). Convincing similar and dissimilar others: The power of language abstraction in political communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 596-607.
49.
MenegattiM.RubiniM. (2014). Initiating, maintaining, or breaking up? The motivated use of language abstraction in romantic relationships. Social Psychology, 45, 408-420.
50.
MoscatelliS.AlbarelloF.PratiF.RubiniM. (2014). Badly off or better off than them? The impact of relative deprivation and relative gratification on implicit and overt intergroup discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 248-264.
51.
MoscatelliS.AlbarelloF.RubiniM. (2008). Linguistic discrimination in minimal groups: The impact of status differentials. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 140-154.
52.
MoscatelliS.RubiniM. (2011). The impact of group entitativity on linguistic discrimination: Ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation in the explanation of negative outcome allocations. Social Psychology, 42, 292-299.
53.
MoscatelliS.RubiniM. (2013). The impact of group entitativity on negative outcome allocations. Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 149-160.
54.
PaoliniS.CrispR. J.McIntyreK. (2009). Accountability moderates member-to-group generalization: Testing a dual process model of stereotype change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 676-685.
55.
PaoliniS.HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA. (2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 770-786.
56.
PereiraC.ValaJ.Costa-LopesR. (2010). From prejudice to discrimination: The legitimizing role of perceived threat in discrimination against immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1231-1250.
57.
PettigrewT. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
58.
PratiF.MoscatelliS.PrattoF.RubiniM. (2015). Predicting support for Arabs’ autonomy from social dominance: The role of identity complexity and dehumanization. Political Psychology.
59.
PratiF.VasiljevicM.CrispJ. R.RubiniM. (2015). Some extended psychological benefits of challenging social stereotypes: Decreased dehumanization and a reduced reliance on heuristic thinking. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1368430214567762.
60.
PrattoF.CidamA.StewartA. L.ZeineddineF. B.ArandaM.AielloA.. . . HenkelK. E. (2013). Social dominance in context and in individuals: Contextual moderation of robust effects of social dominance orientation in 15 languages and 20 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 587-599.
61.
PrattoF.SaguyT.StewartA. L.MorselliD.FoelsR.AielloA.. . . SweetmanJ. (2014). Attitudes toward Arab ascendance: Israeli and global perspectives. Psychological Science, 25, 85-94.
62.
ReidS. A.NgS. H. (1999). Language, power, and intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 119-139.
63.
RubiniM.KruglanskiA. W. (1997). Brief encounters ending in estrangement: Motivated language use and interpersonal rapport in the question–answer paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1047-1060.
64.
RubiniM.MenegattiM. (2008). Linguistic bias in personnel selection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 168-181.
65.
RubiniM.MenegattiM. (2014). Hindering women’s careers in academia: Gender linguistic bias in personnel selection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 632-650.
66.
RubiniM.MenegattiM.MoscatelliS. (2014). The strategic role of language abstraction in achieving symbolic and practical goals. European Review of Social Psychology, 25, 263-313.
67.
RubiniM.MoscatelliS.AlbarelloF.PalmonariA. (2007). Group power as a determinant of interdependence and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1203-1221.
68.
RubiniM.MoscatelliS.PalmonariA. (2007). Increasing group entitativity: Linguistic intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 280-296.
69.
RubiniM.SeminG. R. (1994). Language use in the context of congruent and incongruent in-group behaviours. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 355-362.
70.
SeminG. R. (2000). Agenda 2000—Communication: Language as an implementation device for cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 596-612.
71.
SeminG. R.FiedlerK. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558-568.
72.
SeminG. R.FiedlerK. (1991). The linguistic category model, its bases, applications, and range. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 1-30.
73.
SeminG. R.FiedlerK. (1992). The inferential properties of interpersonal verbs. In SeminG. R.FiedlerK. (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 58-78). London, England: Sage.
74.
SeminG. R.HigginsT.de MontesL. G.EstourgetY.ValenciaJ. F. (2005). Linguistic signatures of regulatory focus: How abstraction fits promotion more than prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 36-45.
75.
SmithE. R.SeminG. R. (2004). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 53-117). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
76.
SwartH.HewstoneM.ChristO.VociA. (2011). Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A three-wave longitudinal study in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1221-1238.
77.
TurnerR. N.HewstoneM.VociA. (2007). Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 369-388.
78.
VanbeselaereN. (1987). The effects of dichotomous and crossed social categorization upon intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 143-156.
79.
VasiljevicM.CrispR. J. (2013). Tolerance by surprise: Evidence for a generalized reduction in prejudice and increased egalitarianism through novel category combination. PLoS ONE8(3): e57106.
80.
VociA.HewstoneM. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 37-54.
81.
VonofakouC.HewstoneM.VociA.PaoliniS.TurnerR.TauschN.. . . CairnsE. (2008). The impact of direct and extended cross-group friendships on improving intergroup relations. In WagnerU.TroppL.FinchilescuG.TredouxC. (Eds.), Improving intergroup relations: Building on the legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew (pp. 107-123). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
82.
WigboldusD. H. J.DouglasK. M. (2007). Language, stereotypes, and intergroup relations. In FiedlerK. (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 79-106). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
83.
WigboldusD. H. J.SeminG. R.SpearsR. (2000). How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic biases and inferential consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 5-18.
84.
ZagefkaH.BrownR.BroquardM.MartinS. L. (2007). Predictors and consequences of negative attitudes toward immigrants in Belgium and Turkey: The role of acculturation preferences in economic competition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 153-169.
