Impolite forms of address to others are linked with impolite behaviors. The present study sought to examine a possible link between spousal forms of address and intimate partner violence (IPV). Study 1 validated impolite scale ratings of spousal forms of address. Study 2 examined the links between spousal forms of address and IPV. Thirty-six heterosexual couples were sampled (N = 72). Husbands’ negative impoliteness ratings were positively linked with physical IPV against their wives.
BrownP.LevinsonS. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BrownR.GilmanA. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In ThomasA. S. (Ed.), Style and language (pp. 253-276). Cambridge: MIT Press.
3.
CampbellJ. C.WebsterD. W.GlassN. (2009). The danger assessment: Validation of a lethality risk assessment instrument for intimate partner femicide. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 653-674.
4.
CordovaJ. V.JacobsonN. S.GottmanJ. M.RusheR.CoxG. (1993). Negative reciprocity and communication in couples with a violent husband. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 559-564.
5.
CrozierW.DimmockP. S. (1999). Name-calling and nicknames in a sample of primary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 505-516.
6.
CulpeperJ. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 349-367.
7.
CulpeperJ.BousfieldD.WichmannA. (2003). Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1545-1579.
8.
EllsbergM.JansenH. A.HeiseL.WattsC. H.Garcia-MorenoC. (2008). Intimate partner violence and women’s physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence: An observational study. Lancet, 371, 1165-1172.
HeavenP. C.SmithL.PrabhakarS. M.AbrahamJ.MeteM. E. (2006). Personality and conflict communication patterns in cohabiting couples. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 829-840.
11.
IshiiA.AsukaiN.KimuraY.SuenagaT.KurosakiM.KishimotoJ. (2003). The reliability and validity of the domestic violence screening inventory (DVSI). Clinical Psychiatry, 45, 817-823. (In Japanese)
12.
JohnsonM. P.FerraroK. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 948-963.
13.
KeltnerD.YoungR. C.HeereyE. A.OemigC.MonarchN. D. (1998). Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1231-1247.
14.
KennyD. A.La VoieL. (1985). Separating individual and group effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 339-348.
15.
KroppP. R.HartS. D. (2000). The spousal assault risk assessment (SARA) guide: Reliability and validity in adult male offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 101-118.
16.
PengF. C. (1974). Communicative distance. Language Sciences, 31, 32-38.
17.
RobertsonK.MurachverT. (2006). Intimate partner violence linguistic features and accommodation behavior of perpetrators and victims. Journal of Language and Social Psychology,25, 406-422.
18.
SimmonsR. A.GordonP. C.ChamblessD. L. (2005). Pronouns in marital interaction: What do “you” and “I” say about marital health?Psychological Science, 16, 932-936.
19.
SeiterJ. S.WegerH. (2013). Does a customer by any other name tip the same? The effect of forms of address and customers’ age on gratuities given to food servers in the United States. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 1592-1598.
20.
StrausM.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS.SugarmanD. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
21.
SuzukiK. (1993). Data: Summary of questionnaire research and comments. Tozai Nanboku (Bulletin of the Wako Institute of Social and Cultural Sciences), 1993, 112-121. (In Japanese)
22.
TafoyaM. A.HamiltonM. A. (2012). Relational dynamics and the expression of aggression and comforting between siblings. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31, 49-74.
23.
WoodL. A.KrogerR. O. (1991). Politeness and forms of address. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 10, 145-168.
24.
YokotaniK. (2012). How young adults address their parents reflects their perception of parenting. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 284-289.
25.
YokotaniK. (2013a). Acknowledge spousal forms of address predict couple communication patterns. Psychologia, 56, 20-32.
26.
YokotaniK. (2013b). Husbands’ forms of address for wives predict intimate partner violence against women. International Journal of Brief Therapy and Family Science, 3, 1-13.
27.
YokotaniK. (2013c). Avoidant addresses in Japanese families reflect family conflicts. Psychology of Language and Communication, 17, 65-77.
