Using the lens of positioning theory and a mixed methods strategy, we investigate domestic media’s production of nationalism during an international conflict. Philippine and Chinese news accounts of the Scarborough Shoal conflict are text mined by RapidMiner software. With almost 100% accuracy, mathematical models successfully classify sets-of-words that belong to each domestic newspaper. Principal components analyses show that Philippine Daily Inquirer reports revolve around words related to local fishing and livelihoods. News accounts in China’s People’s Daily uphold national sovereignty. A complementary qualitative analysis of the news reports gives our mathematically derived themes more meaning. Philippine maritime claims cite recent Philippine history and international law. China’s story references lost sovereignty and ancient rather than recent history. Positioning analysis demonstrates how each newspaper claims its own country owns Scarborough Shoal and is the victim of the other country. Our findings show how two contradictory and nationalistic versions of an international conflict may be linguistically constructed by domestic media. Our research also highlights the illuminative power of positioning theory in the field of international relations and media analysis.
BaneaC.MihalceaR.WiebeJ. (2010). Multilingual subjectivity: Are more languages better? In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 28-36). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
3.
BaneaC.MihalceaR.WiebeJ.HassanS. (2008). Multilingual subjectivity analysis using machine translation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 127-135). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
4.
Beijing Journalism Association. (1986). An analysis of Renmin Ribao readers. Chinese Sociology and Anthropology, 18, 114-122.
5.
BellA. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13, 145-204.
ChanM. (2014). (Re)categorizing intergroup relations and social identities through news discourse: The case of the China Daily’s reporting on regional conflict. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 144-164.
8.
ChenJ.HuangH.TianS.QuY. (2009). Feature selection for text classification with naïve Bayes. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 5432-5435.
9.
GollerC.LöningJ.WillT.WolffW. (2000). Automatic document classification: A thorough evaluation of various methods. ISI, 2000, 145-162.
10.
GuptaV. (2011). Recent trends in text classification techniques. International Journal of Computer Applications, 35, 45-51.
11.
HarishB. S.GuruD. S.ManjunathS. (2010). Representation and classification of text documents: A brief review. International Journal of Computer Applications, 2, 110-119.
12.
HarreR.MoghaddamF. (2003). Introduction: The self and others in traditional psychology and in positioning theory. In HarreR.MoghaddamF. (Eds.), The self and others (pp. 1-11). Westport, CT: Praeger.
13.
HassR. (2009). The role of media in conflict and their influence on securitisation. International Spectator, 44, 77-91.
14.
HermannM. G.KegleyC. W. (1995). Rethinking democracy and international peace: Perspectives from political psychology. International Studies Quarterly, 39, 511-533.
15.
HoffmanL. H. (2012). When the world outside gets inside your head: The effects of media context on perceptions of public opinion. Communications Research, 40, 463-485.
16.
HornseyM. J.GalloisC.DuckJ. M. (2008). The intersection of communication and social psychology: Points of contact and points of difference. Journal of Communication, 58, 749-766.
17.
KanayamaH.NasukawaT. (2006). Fully automatic lexicon expansion for domain-oriented sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 355-363). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
18.
KimJ.LiJ.LeeJ. (2010). Evaluating multilanguage-comparability of subjectivity analysis systems. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 595-603). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
19.
LeeN. (2010). Afterword. In MoghaddamF.HarreR.LeeN. (Eds.), Global conflict resolution through positioning analysis (pp. 201-207). New York, NY: Springer.
20.
LiJ. (2009). Intertextuality and national identity: Discourse of national conflicts in daily newspapers in the United States and China. Discourse & Society, 20, 85-121.
21.
LouisW. (2008). Intergroup positioning and power. In MoghaddamF.HarreR.LeeN. (Eds.), Global conflict resolution through positioning analysis (pp. 21-39). New York, NY: Springer.
22.
LuntP.LivingstoneS. (2001). Language and the media: An emerging field for social psychology. In RobinsonW. P.GilesH. (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 585-600). London, England: Wiley.
23.
MoghaddamF.HarreR. (Eds.). (2010). Words of conflict, words of war: How the language we use in political processes sparks fighting. Santa Barbara, CO: Praeger.
24.
MoghaddamF.HarreR.LeeN. (Eds.). (2008). Global conflict resolution through positioning analysis. New York, NY: Springer.
25.
NgS. H.YeJ.LeeC.-C. (2011). Media discourse on globalization in China: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30, 139-157.
PittsM. J.NussbaumJ. F. (2006). Integrating the past and paving the future: Examining current trends and extending boundaries of language and social psychology research. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25, 197-202.
28.
PotterJ.EdwardsD. (2001). Discursive social psychology. In RobinsonW. P.GilesH. (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 103-118). London, England: Wiley.
29.
PruittD. G.KimS. H. (2004). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
30.
ScheufeleD. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 297-316.
31.
SimonB.KlandermansB. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56, 319-331.
32.
SingelisT. M. (1996). The context of intergroup communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 360-371.
33.
Slocum-BradleyN. (2010). The positioning diamond: A trans-disciplinary framework for discourse analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 40, 79-107.
34.
SnyderG. H. (2002). Mearsheimer’s world-offensive realism and the struggle for security. International Security, 27, 149-173.
35.
StarrJ. B. (2010). Understanding China: A guide to China’s economy, history, and political culture (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Hill & Wang.
36.
StewartC. O.PittsM. J.OsborneH. (2010). Mediated intergroup conflict: The discursive construction of “illegal immigrants” in a regional U.S. newspaper. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30, 8-27.
37.
TsalikiL. (1995). The media and the construction of an “imagined community”: The role of media events on Greek television. European Journal of Communication, 10, 345-370.
38.
Van DijkT. A. (1988). News analysis: Case studies of international and national news in the press. London, England: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
WaltzK. N. (1988). The origins of war in neorealist theory. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18, 615-628. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/204817
40.
WangY.WangZ. (2007). A fast KNN algorithm for text categorization. In Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2007 International Conference (Vol. 6, pp. 3436-3441). New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
41.
YaoJ.WuG.LiuJ.ZhengY. (2006). Using bilingual lexicon to judge sentiment orientation of Chinese words. In The Sixth IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (p. 38). Washington, DC: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Computer Society.
42.
ZhangW.YoshidaT.TangX. (2008). Text classification based on multi-word with support vector machine. Knowledge-Based Systems, 21, 879-886.
