This article presents a conversation analysis of strategies used by interlocutors in first encounters to solicit and display personal information. It presents a standardized sequence used to elicit personal information, called the self-presentational sequence, consisting of a request for self-presentation, an answer (the self-presentation proper) and a response to the self-presentation. The moves of the sequence may be considered as functionally adapted to establishing an interpersonal relationship by displaying other-attentiveness, claiming common ground, and establishing a relation of cooperativeness. The second part of the article presents a more indirect mode of self-presentation, in which participants provide personal background information as occasioned by the topic under discussion. The article contributes to describing the conversational forms self-presentation takes in authentic conversations and to explaining the relational functions of such forms in light of theories of politeness and relationship management.
ArundaleR. B. (2006). Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research, 2, 193-216.
2.
BergerC. R. (1992). Uncertainty and social interaction. In DeetzS. A. (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 16, pp. 491-502). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
BergerC. R.BradacJ. J. (1982). Language and social knowledge: Uncertainty in interpersonal relations. London, England: Edward Arnold.
4.
BrownP.LevinsonS. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5.
ButtonG.CaseyN. (1984). Generating topic: the use of topic initial elicitors. In AtkinsonM.HeritageJ. (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 167-190). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6.
ByrneD. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York, NY: Academic Press.
7.
ClarkH. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8.
ClarkH. H. (1998). Communal lexicons. In MalmkjærK.WilliamsJ. (Eds.), Context in language learning and language understanding (pp. 63-87). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CouplandJ. (Ed.). (2000). Small talk. Harlow, England: Pearson.
10.
DerlegaV. J.WinsteadB. A.GreeneK. (2008). Self-disclosure and starting a close relationship. In SprecherS.WenzelA.HarveyJ. (Eds.), The handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 153-174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Du BoisJ.Schuetze-CoburnS.PaolinoD.CummingS. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In EdwardsJ. A.LampertM. D. (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 221-260). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
DuckS.PittmanG. (1994). Social and personal relationships. In KnappM. L.MillerG. R. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 676-695). London, England: Sage.
13.
GoffmanE. (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York, NY: Free Press.
14.
GoffmanE. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York, NY: Pantheon.
15.
HeritageJ. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
16.
HoltenE. (2013). Hvordan språket brukes som verktøy for å bli kjent. En samtaleanalyse av velkomstsamtalen mellom lærer og elev første skoledag ved en videregående skole [How language is used as a tool to get acquainted. A conversation analysis of the welcome conversation between teacher and pupil the first day of school at a high school] (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
17.
HoltgravesT. (1990). The language of self-disclosure. In GilesH.RobinsonW. P. (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 191-207). Chichester, England: Wiley.
18.
HoltgravesT. (2002). Language as social action. Social psychology and language use. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
HoneycuttJ. M. (1992). Components and functions of communication during initial interaction, with extrapolations to beyond. In DeetzS. A. (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 16,pp. 461-490). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
HopperR. (1989). Conversation analysis and social psychology as descriptions of interpersonal communication. In RogerD.BullP. (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 48-65). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
21.
JeffersonG. (1972). Side sequences. In SudnowD. (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 295-331). New York, NY: Free Press.
22.
KellermannK. (1995). The conversation MOP: A model of patterned and pliable behavior. In HewesD. E. (Eds.), The cognitive bases of interpersonal communication (pp. 181-221). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
KellermannK.LimT. (1989). Conversational acquaintance: The flexibility of routinized behaviors. In DervinB.GrossbergL.O’KeefeB.WartellaE. (Eds.), Rethinking communication. Vol. 2: Paradigm exemplars (pp. 172-192). London, England: Sage.
24.
KellermannK.PalomaresN. A. (2004). Topical profiling: Emergent, co-occurring, and relationally defining topics in talk. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 308-337.
25.
KorobovN. (2011). Mate-preference talk in speed-dating conversations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44, 186-209.
26.
LinellP. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically. Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
27.
LinellP. (2011). Samtalskulturer. Kommunikativa verksamhetstyper i samhället [Conversational cultures. Communicative activity types in society] (Vols. 1 and 2). Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University.
28.
LocherM. A.WattsR. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1, 9-33.
29.
LocherM. A. (2006). Polite behavior within relational work: The discursive approach to politeness. Multilingua, 25, 249-267.
30.
MandelbaumJ. (2003). Interactive methods for constructing relationships. In GlennP.LeBaronC. D.MandelbaumJ. (Eds.), Studies in language and social interaction. In honor of Robert Hopper (pp. 207-220). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
MaynardD.ZimmermanD. (1984). Topical talk, ritual and the social organization of relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 301-316.
32.
PomerantzA. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In AtkinsonM.HeritageJ. (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
SacksH. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vols. 1 and 2, JeffersonG., Ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
35.
SchegloffE. A. (2001). Getting serious: joke → serious “no”. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1947-1955.
36.
SchegloffE. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
37.
SchneiderK. P. (1987). Topic selection in phatic communication. Multilingua, 6, 247-256.
38.
SchneiderK. P. (1988). Small talk: Analysing phatic discourse. Marburg, Germany: Hitzeroth.
39.
SearleJ. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40.
StokoeE. (2010). “Have you been married, or . . . ?” Eliciting and accounting for relationship histories in speed-dating encounters. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43, 260-282.
41.
SvennevigJ. (1999). Getting acquainted in conversation. A study of initial interactions. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
