In everyday life, people use language to communicate evaluative messages about social categories. A selection bias in language across two social dimensions not previously integrated was examined: a self-inclusive/self-exclusive dimension and an individual/collective dimension. Pronouns as markers for social categories were adopted (I, We, He/She, and They), and a new measure was developed (the Evaluative Sentence Generating task) to investigate the evaluative context selected for the pronouns. Results demonstrate that individuals select a more positive context for self-inclusive than self-exclusive pronouns and a more positive context for individual than collective pronouns. However, in an interpersonal context, evaluative differences between I and We diminished, whereas in an intergroup condition the evaluative gap between self-inclusive and self-exclusive pronouns was magnified.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751-763.
2.
AllportG. W. (1979). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley. (Original work published 1954)
3.
AronssonK.Sätterlund-LarssonU. (1987). Politeness strategies and doctor-patient communication: On the social choreography of collaborative thinking. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6, 1-27.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.IlkoS. A. (1995). Shallow gratitude: Public and private acknowledgment of external help in accounts of success. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 191-209.
5.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
6.
BrewerM. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: Cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
7.
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429-444.
8.
BrewerM. B. (2007). The importance of being we: Human nature and intergroup relations. American Psychologist, 62, 726-738.
9.
BrewerM. B.GardnerW. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
10.
BrownP.LevinsonS. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CampbellR. S.PennebakerJ. W. (2003). The secret life of pronouns: Flexibility in writing style and physical health. Psychological Science, 14, 60-65.
12.
ChungC.PennebakerJ. (2007). The psychological functions of function words. In FiedlerK. (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 343-359). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
13.
CortesB. P.DemoulinS.RodriguezR. T.RodriguezA. P.LeyensJ. P. (2005). Infrahumanization or familiarity? Attribution of uniquely human emotions to the self, the ingroup, and the outgroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 243-253.
14.
CritcherC. R.HelzerE. G.DunningD. (2011). Self-enhancement via redefinition: Defining social concepts to ensure positive views of the self. In AlickeM. D.SedikidesC. (Eds.), Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection (pp. 69-91). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
15.
del PradoA. M.ChurchA. T.KatigbakM. S.MiramontesL. G.WhittyM. T.CurtisG. J.ReyesJ. A. S. (2007). Culture, method, and the content of self-concepts: Testing trait, individual—Self-primacy, and cultural psychology perspectives. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1119-1160.
16.
DovidioJ. F.GlickP.RudmanL. A. (2005). On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
17.
DunbarR. I. M. (1993). Co-evolution of neo-cortex, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 681-735.
18.
DunbarR. I. M. (1997). Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. New York, NY: Faber & Faber.
19.
FiedlerK. (2008). Language: A toolbox for sharing and influencing social reality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 38-47.
20.
FiskeS. T. (2012). Managing ambivalent prejudices: Smart-but-cold and warm-but-cumb stereotypes. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 639, 33-48.
21.
FiskeS. T.LinM.NeubergS. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In ChaikenS.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 231-254). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
22.
FitzsimonsG. M.KayA. C. (2004). Language and interpersonal cognition: Causal effects of variations in pronoun usage on perceptions of closeness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 547-557.
23.
GaertnerL.IuzziniJ.WittM. G.OrinaM. M. (2006). Us without them: Evidence for an intragroup origin of positive in-group regard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 426-439.
24.
GaertnerL.SedikidesC.LukeM.O’MaraE. M.IuzziniJ.JacksonL. E.WuQ. (2012). A motivational hierarchy within: Primacy of the individual self, relational self, or collective self?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 997-1013.
25.
GaertnerL.SedikidesC.VeveaJ. L.IuzziniJ. (2002). The “I,” the “we,” and the “when”: A meta-analysis of motivational primacy in self-definition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 574-591.
26.
GrafS.BilewiczM.FinellE.GeschkeD. (2012). Nouns cut slices: Effects of linguistic forms on intergroup bias. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 62-83.
27.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
GoffmanE. (1981). Forms of talk/Erving Goffman. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
30.
HoltgravesT. M. (2002). Language as social action: Social psychology and language use. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31.
KenworthyJ. B.MillerN. (2002). Attributional biases about the origins of attitudes: Externality, emotionality and rationality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 693-707.
32.
KraussR. M.ChiuC.-Y. (1997). Language and social behavior. In GilbertD.FiskeS.LindseyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 41-88). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
33.
LeeJ. J.PinkerS. (2010). Rationales for indirect speech: The theory of the strategic speaker. Psychological Review, 117, 785-807.
34.
MaassA.CeccarelliR.RudinS. (1996). Linguistic intergroup bias: Evidence for in-group-protective motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 512-526.
35.
MaassA.MilesiA.ZabbiniS.StahlbergD. (1995). Linguistic intergroup bias: Differential expectancies or in-group protection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 116-126.
36.
MaassA.SalviD.ArcuriL.SeminG. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981-993.
37.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
38.
MillerN. (2002). Personalization and the promise of contact theory. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 387-410.
39.
MillerR. S.SchlenkerB. R. (1985). Egotism in group members: Public and private attributions of responsibility for group-performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 85-89.
40.
MullenB.BrownR.SmithC. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
41.
NettleD. (1999). Using social impact theory to simulate language change. Lingua, 108, 95-117.
42.
PennebakerJ. W.MehlM. R.NiederhofferK. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547-577.
43.
PerdueC. W.GurtmanM. B.DovidioJ. F.TylerR. B. (1990). Us and them: Social categorization and the process of intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 475-486.
44.
ReidS. A.GilesH. (2005). Intergroup relations: Its linguistic and communicative parameters. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 211-214.
45.
ReidS. A.GilesH.HarwoodJ. (2005). A self-categorization perspective on communication and intergroup relations. In HarwoodJ.GilesH. (Eds.), Intergroup communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 241-263). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
46.
SedikidesC.GreggA. P. (2008). Self-enhancement: Food for thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 102-116.
47.
SeminG. R.FiedlerK. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558-568.
48.
SextonJ. B.HelmreichR. L. (2000). Analyzing cockpit communications: The links between language, performance, error, and workload. Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 5, 63-68.
49.
SherifM.HarveyO. J.WhiteB. J.HoodW. R.SherifC. V. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robbers cave experiment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.
50.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
51.
TarisT. W. (1999). Describing behaviours of self and others: Self-enhancing beliefs and language abstraction level. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 391-396.
52.
TurnerJ. C. (1987). A self-categorization theory. In TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 42-67). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
53.
WigboldusD. H. J.SeminG. R.SpearsR. (2000). How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic bases and inferential consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 5-18.
54.
WilsonS. R.KunkelA. D.RobsonS. J.OlufowoteJ. O.SolizJ. (2009). Identity implications of relationship (re)definition goals: An analysis of face threats and facework as young adults initiate, intensify, and disengage from romantic relationships. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28, 32-61.
55.
Von HippelW.SekaquaptewaD.VargasP. T. (2008). Linguistic markers of implicit attitudes. In PettyR. E.FazioR. H.BrinolP. (Eds.), Attitudes: Insight from the new implicit measures (pp. 429-458). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
