The aim of the present research was to show that the level of linguistic abstraction used when describing group behaviors affects inferences about the speaker’s degree of bias toward that group. Participants used a speaker’s description of a group to judge that person’s communicative intentions (Study 1) and attitudes (Study 2) toward the group. The results show that speakers who use abstract terms are perceived as more biased than speakers who use concrete terms.
AriyantoA.HornseyM. J.GalloisC. (2010). United we stand: Intergroup conflict moderates the intergroup sensitivity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 169-177.
2.
BeukeboomC. J.FinkenauerC.WigboldusD. H. J. (2010). The negation bias: When negations signal stereotypic expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 978-992.
3.
CastelliL.ArcuriL.ZogmaisterC. (2003). Perceiving ingroup members who use stereotypes: Implicit conformity and similarity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 163-175.
4.
ColeT.LeetsL. (1998). Linguistic masking devices and intergroup behavior: Further evidence of an intergroup linguistic bias. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 348-371.
5.
CzoppA. M. (2008). When is a compliment not a compliment? Evaluating expressions of positive stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 413-420.
6.
DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M. (2003). Effects of communication goals and expectancies on language abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 682-696.
7.
DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M. (2006). When what you say about others says something about you: Language abstraction and inferences about describers’ attitudes and goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 500-508.
8.
DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M. (2010). By their words ye shall know them: Language abstraction and the likeability of describers. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 366-374.
9.
JostJ. T. (2001). Outgroup favoritism and the theory of system justification: A paradigm for investigating the effects of socioeconomic success on stereotype content. In MoskowitzG. B. (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition (pp. 89-102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
MaassA. (1999). Linguistic intergroup bias: Stereotype perpetuation through language. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 79-121). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11.
MaassA.SalviD.ArcuriL.SeminG. R. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981-993.
12.
MaeL.CarlstonD. (2005). Hoist on your own petard: When prejudiced remarks are recognized and backfire on speakers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 240-255.
13.
PerloffR. M. (2010). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st century. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
14.
SeminG. R. (2000). Agenda 2000-communication: Language as an implementational device for cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 595-612.
15.
SeminG. R.FiedlerK. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558-568.
16.
SimonL.GreenbergJ. (1996). Further progress in understanding the effects of derogatory ethnic labels: The role of preexisting attitudes toward the targeted group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1195-1204.
17.
SuttonR. M. (2010). The creative power of language in social cognition and intergroup relations. In GilesH.ReidS.HarwoodJ. (Eds.), The dynamics of intergroup communication (pp. 105-115). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
18.
SuttonR. M.DouglasK. M.ElderT. J.TarrantM. (2008). Social identity and social convention in responses to criticisms of groups. In KashimaY.FiedlerK.FreytagP. (Eds.), Stereotype dynamics: Language-based approaches to the formation, maintenance, and transformation of stereotypes (pp. 339-365). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
SuttonR. M.ElderT. J.DouglasK. M. (2006). Reactions to internal and external criticism of outgroups: Social convention in the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 563-575.
20.
WigboldusD. H. J.DouglasK. M. (2007). Language, stereotypes, and intergroup relations. In FiedlerK. (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 79-106). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
