Students encountering each other for the first time were asked to converse for 30 minutes either face-to-face or through online chat. Conversational quality was compared to examine the possibility that specific social differences in communicative style are reduced or erased in online chat. As expected, gender differences evident in face-to-face conversation were absent online. However, conversational differences between experienced and inexperienced online chat users were, on the whole, similar across conditions. More generally, online chat appeared to produce less sequential connectivity, greater self-focus, and less other-focus than did face-to-face conversation.
BarghJ. A.McKennaK. Y. A. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573-590.
2.
BaymN. K. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Cambridge, England: Polity.
3.
BeebeT. J.AscheS. E.HarrisonP. A.QuinlanK. B. (2004). Heightened vulnerability and increased risk-taking among adolescent chat room users: Results from a statewide school survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 116-123.
BurgoonJ.HooblerG. (2002). Nonverbal signals. In KnappM.DalyJ. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 240-299). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
ButlerJ. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
CaplanS. E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic Internet use and psychological well-being. Communication Research, 30, 625-648.
8.
CaplanS. E. (2007). Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 234-242.
9.
GriceH. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In ColeP.MorganJ. M. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York, NY: Seminar Press.
10.
JoinsonA. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177-192.
11.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
SchegloffE. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
StraussS.XiangX. (2009). Discourse particles: Where cognition and interaction intersect—The case of final particle ey in Shishan dialect (Hainan Island, P. R. China). Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1287-1312.
17.
TannenD. (1999). Women and men in conversation. In WheelerR. S. (Ed.), The workings of language: From prescriptions to perspectives (pp. 211-216). Westport, CT: Praeger.
18.
TidwellL. C.WaltherJ. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317-348.
19.
Tom-TongS.WaltherJ. B. (2011). Just say “no thanks”: Romantic rejection in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 488-506.
20.
WaltherJ. B. (2009). In point of practice: Computer-mediated communication and virtual groups: Applications to interethnic conflict. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 225-238.
21.
WestC.ZimmermanD. H. (1998). Doing gender. In MyersK. A.AndersonC. D.RismanB. J. (Eds.), Feminist foundations: Toward transforming sociology (pp. 167-190). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
WooffittR. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis. London, England: Sage.
