Extending Raney and Depalma’s research, this study examined effects of sport production on sport consumption. An experimental design crossed scripted (vs. unscripted) sport with violence (vs. nonviolence) to investigate the effects of both variables on violent outcomes and enjoyment. After viewing one of four clips, participants responded to three incomplete story stems, and responses were coded to measure hostile expectancy bias as a form of violent outcome. Participants also responded to their enjoyment of the clip they consumed. Analyses showed a main effect that consuming sport violence increased participants’ hostile expectancy bias. However, a significant interaction showed that scriptedness moderated this effect, such that violence increased hostile expectancy bias only in the scripted condition. Enjoyment was also affected by scriptedness and violence, as violent nonscripted sports were enjoyed more than all other conditions. Results suggest that violence in sports may be interpreted differently based on the scriptedness of the sport and may be processed differently than violence in other forms of entertainment. Implications of these findings are discussed, as are limitations and future directions for study.
Anderson, C.A., & Bushman, B.J. ( 2002). The effects of media violence of society. Science, 295, 2377-2379.
2.
Andrew, D.P.S., Koo, G., Hardin, R., & Greenwell, T.C. (2009). Analyzing motives of minor league hockey fans: The introduction of violence as a spectator motive. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 5, 73-89.
3.
Arms, R.L., Russell, G.W., & Sandilands, M.L. (1979). Effects on the hostility of spectators of viewing aggressive sports. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 275-279.
4.
Brown, T.J., Sumner, K.E., & Nocera, R. ( 2002). Understanding sexual aggression against women: An examination of the role of men’s athletic participation and related variables. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 937-952.
5.
Bryant, J., Brown, D., Comisky, P.W., & Zillmann, D. ( 1982). Sports and spectators: Commentary and appreciation. Journal of Communication, 32, 109-119.
6.
Bryant, J., Comisky, P.W., & Zillmann, D. ( 1981). The appeal of rough-and-tumble play in televised professional football. Communication Quarterly, 29, 256-262.
7.
Bryant, J., & Miron, D. ( 2003). Excitation-transfer theory and three-factor theory of emotion. In J. Bryant, D. Roskos-Ewoldsen, & J. Cantor (Eds.), Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann (pp. 31-59). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Bryant, J., & Raney, A.A. ( 2000). Sports on the screen. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 153-174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Bushman, B.J., & Anderson, C.A. (2001). Media violence and the American public: Scientific facts versus media misinformation. American Psychologist, 56, 477-489.
10.
Bushman, B.J., & Anderson, C.A. (2002). Violent video games and hostile expectations: A test of the general aggression model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 1679-1686.
11.
Cantor, J. ( 1998). Children’s attraction to violent television programming . In J. H. Goldstein (Ed.), Why we watch: The attractions of violent entertainment (pp. 88-115). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
Celozzi, M.J., Kazelskis, R., & Gutsch, K.U. ( 1981). The relationship between viewing televised violence in ice hockey and subsequent levels of personal aggression. Journal of Sport Behavior, 4, 157-162.
13.
Cohen, J. ( 1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
14.
Cronbach, L.J. ( 1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests . Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
15.
DeNeui, D.L., & Sachau, D.A. ( 1996). Spectator enjoyment of aggression in intercollegiate hockey games. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 21, 69-77.
16.
Depalma, A., & Raney, A.A. ( 2003, May). The effect of viewing varying levels of aggressive sports programming on enjoyment, mood, and perceived violence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
17.
Diener, E., & DeFour, D. (1978). Does television violence enhance program popularity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 333-341.
18.
Gantz, W., Bradley, S.D., & Wang, Z. ( 2006). Televised NFL games, the family, and domestic violence: A 15-city study. In A. Raney & J. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of sports and media (pp. 365-381). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Gunter, B. ( 2006). Sports violence. In A. Raney & J. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of sports and media (pp. 353-364). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Guttmann, A. ( 1998). The appeal of violent sports. In J. H. Goldstein (Ed.), Why we watch: The attractions of violent entertainment (pp. 7-26). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
Herman, G., & Leyens, J.P. ( 1977). Rating films on TV. Journal of Communication , 27, 48-53.
22.
"History of Criminal Charges on Ice". (2004, June 24). Canadian Press. Retrieved from http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=88823
23.
Hoberman, J. ( 1998). "A test for the individual viewer": Bonnie and Clyde’s violent reception. In J. H. Goldstein (Ed.), Why we watch: The attractions of violent entertainment (pp. 116-143). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
Jansen, S.C., & Sabo, D. ( 1994). The sport/war metaphor: Hegemonic masculinity, the Persian Gulf War, and the new world order. Sociology of Sport Journal , 11, 1-17.
25.
Kassing, J.W., Billings, A.C., Brown, R.S., Halone, K.K., Harrison, K., Krizek, B., . . . Turman, P.D. ( 2004). Communication and the community of sport: The process of enacting, (re) producing, consuming, and organizing sport. Communication Yearbook, 28, 373-408.
26.
Phillips, D.P. ( 1983). The impact of mass media violence on U.S. homicides. American Sociological Review, 48, 560-568.
27.
Potter, W.J. ( 1997). The problem with indexing risk of viewing television aggression. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 14, 228-248.
28.
Potter, W.J. ( 1999). On media violence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Potter, W.J., & Tomasello, T.K. (2003). Building upon the experimental design in media violence research: The importance of including receiver interpretations . Journal of Communication, 53, 315-329.
30.
Raney, A.A., & Depalma, A.J. ( 2006). The effects of viewing varying levels and contexts of violent sports programming on enjoyment, mood, and perceived violence. Mass Communication and Society, 9, 321-338.
31.
Russell, G.W., Di Lullo, S.L., & Di Lullo, D. ( 1988). Effects of observing competitive and violent versions of a sport. Current Psychology: Research and Reviews, 7, 312-321.
32.
Sullivan, D.B. ( 1991). Commentary and viewer perception of player hostility: Adding punch to televised sport. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 35, 487-504.
33.
Tamborini, R., Chory, R.M., Lachlan, K., Westerman, D., & Skalski, P. ( 2008). Talking smack: Verbal aggression in professional wrestling . Communication Studies, 59, 242-258.
34.
Tamborini, R., Skalski, P., Lachlan, K., Westerman, D., Davis, J., & Smith, S.L. ( 2005). The raw nature of televised professional wrestling: Is the violence a cause for concern? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 202-220.
35.
Wartella, E., & Reeves, B. ( 1985). Historical trends in research on children and the media: 1900-1960. Journal of Communication, 35, 118-133.
36.
Wilson, B.J., Kunkel, D., Linz, D., Potter, W.J., Donnerstein, E., Smith, S.L., . . . Gray, T. ( 1997). Violence in television programming overall: University of California, Santa Barbara study. In National Television Violence Study (Vol. 1, pp. 3-268). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
Wober, J.M. ( 1997). Violence or other routes to appreciation: TV program makers’ options. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41, 190-202.
38.
" World Wrestling Entertainment". (n.d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wrestling_Entertainment
39.
Zillmann, D. ( 1998). The psychology of the appeal of portrayals of violence . In J. H. Goldstein (Ed.), Why we watch: The attractions of violent entertainment (pp. 179-211). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
