Positioning theory was invoked to predict that framing effects of political violence are moderated by the social position of the message receiver. As a reference, for the purpose of this study, the societal structural configurations of Malay Muslims and Filipino Christians led to their classification as respondents from the Dominant Social Position, and Malay Christians and Filipino Muslims as participants in the Nondominant Social Position, respectively. Respondents read a vignette about either a terrorist or a freedom fighter who bombed a building, and then described the story character using trait attributes on a semantic differential scale. Respondents from disadvantaged groups preferred freedom fighters over terrorists, whereas respondents from dominant groups evaluated terrorists more highly than freedom fighters.
Ackerman, P., & DuVall, J. (2000). A force more powerful: A century of nonviolent conflict. New York: Palgrave.
2.
Andaya, B.W., & Andaya, L. (2001). A history of Malaysia (2nd ed.). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave .
3.
Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4.
Blanford, N. (2001). Freedom fighters or terrorists? Christian Science Monitor, 78, 6.
5.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1979 ).
6.
Cole, B. (2006a). Introduction. In B. Cole (Ed.), Conflict, terrorism and the media in Asia (pp. 1-4). New York: Routledge.
7.
Cole, B. (2006b). Al Qaeda and the struggle for moderate Islam in Malaysia. In B. Cole (Ed.), Conflict, terrorism and the media in Asia (pp. 23-40). New York: Routledge.
8.
Druckman, J. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame ? Journal of Politics, 63, 1041-1066.
9.
Ganor, B. (2002). Defining terrorism: Is one man's terrorist another man's freedom fighter? Police Practice and Research, 3, 287-304.
10.
Gillen, B., & Sherman, R. (1980). Physical attractiveness and sex as determinants of trait attributions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 15, 423-437.
11.
Guimond, S., Dambrun, M., Michinov, N., & Duarte, S. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 697-721.
12.
Harré, R. (2004). The social construction of terrorism. In F. Moghaddam & A. Marsella (Eds.), Understanding terrorism: Psychosocial roots, consequences, and interventions (pp. 91-102). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13.
Herbst, P. (2003). Talking terrorism: A dictionary of the loaded language of political violence. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
14.
Higgins, E.T. (2000). Social cognition: Learning about what matters in the social world. European Journal of Psychology, 30, 3-39.
15.
Kennedy, R. (1999). Is one person's terrorist another's freedom fighter? Western and Islamic approaches to "Just War" compared. Terrorism and Political Violence, 11, 1-21.
16.
Leyens, J., Yzerbyt, V., & Schadron, G. (1994). Stereotypes and social cognition. London: Sage.
17.
Martin, P., & Phelan, S. (2002). Representing Islam in the wake of September 11: A comparison of US television and CNN online messageboard discourses. Prometheus, 20, 263-269.
18.
McBurney, D., & White, T. (2004). Research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
19.
Montiel, C.J., & Christie, D. (2007). Conceptual frame for a psychology of nonviolent democratic transitions: Positioning across analytical layers. In F. Moghaddam, R. Harré , & N. Lee (Eds.), Global conflict resolution through positioning theory (pp. 259-278). New York: Springer.
20.
Montiel, C.J., & Macapagal, M.E.J. (2006). Effects of social position on societal attributions of an asymmetric conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 43, 219-227.
21.
Nelson, T.E., Oxley, Z.M., & Clawson, R.A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19, 221-245.
22.
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R.Y. (1985). Social categorization and power differentials in group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology , 15, 415
23.
Schlesinger, P. (1978). Putting "reality" together: BBC news. New York: Methuen.
24.
Schmid, A., & de Graaf, J. (1982). Violence as communication. London: Sage.
25.
Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity. A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist , 56, 319-331.
26.
Snow, D., Rochford, E.B., Worden, S., & Benford, R. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464-481.
27.
Steinberg, M. (1998). Tilting the frame: Considerations on collective action framing from a discursive turn. Theory and Society , 27, 845-872.
28.
Turk, A. (2004). Sociology of terrorism. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 271-286.
29.
van der Pligt, J., & Taylor, C. (1984). Trait attribution: Evaluation, description, and attitude extremity. European Journal of Psychology, 14, 211-221.
30.
van Lagenhove, L., & Harré, R. (1999). Positioning theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
31.
Vitug, M.D., & Gloria, G.M. (2000). Under the crescent moon: Rebellion in Mindanao . Quezon City, Philippines: Ateneo Center for Social Policy and Public Affairs and Institute for Popular Democracy .
32.
Zunes, S., Kurtz, L.R., & Asher, S.B. (1999). Nonviolent social movements: A geographical perspective . Malden, MA: Blackwell.
