The linguistic category model (LCM) is highlighted from 3 interrelated perspectives: (a) as a functional tool with distinctive properties that have evolved to link language producers and perceivers and, therefore, adapted to both; (b) within a general framework of linguistic behavior and an analysis of the architecture of linguistic behavior that highlights why lexical decisions, the prime analytic focus of LCM, generally escape conscious access; and finally (c) from an extended functional one, which views language as an instrument to steer attention and illustrates a new way of looking at how language shapes perception. Specifically, differential attention-driving functions of the LCM categories are illustrated with recent research.
Abler, W.L. (1989). On the particulate principle of self-diversifying systems. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 12, 1-13.
2.
Beukeboom, C.J., & de Jong, E.M. (2008). When feelings speak: How affective and proprioceptive cues change language abstraction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology.
3.
Beukeboom, C.J., & Semin, G.R. (2006). How mood turns on language. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 553-566.
4.
Chomsky, N. (2000). New horizons in the study of language and mind . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Douglas, K.M., & Sutton, R.M. (2003). Effects of communication goals and expectancies on language abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 682-696.
6.
Douglas, K.M., & Sutton, R.M. (2006). When what you say about others says something about you: Language abstraction and inferences about describers' attitudes and goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 500-508.
7.
Douglas, K.M., Sutton, R.M., & Wilkin, K. (2008). Could you mind your language? An investigation of communicators' ability to inhibit linguistic bias. Journal of Language and Social Psychology.
8.
Fiedler, K., Semin, G.R., & Koppetsch, C. (1991). Language use and attributional biases in close personal relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 147-155.
9.
Franco, F.M., & Maass, A. (1996). Implicit versus explicit strategies of out-group discrimination: The role of intentional control in biased language use and reward allocation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology , 15, 335-359.
10.
Franco, F.M., & Maass, A. (1999). Intentional control over prejudice: When the choice of the measure matters. European Journal of Social Psychology , 29, 469-477.
11.
Gauker, C. (1990). How to learn a language like a chimpanzee. Philosophical Psychology, 3, 31-53.
12.
Giles, H., & Coupland, J. (1991). Language: Contexts and consequences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
13.
Langer, E.J. (1989). Minding matters: The consequences of mindlessness-mindfulness . Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 137-173.
14.
Langer, E.J. (1992). Interpersonal mindlessness and language. Communication Monographs. 59, 324-327.
15.
Maass, A. (1999). Linguistic intergroup bias: Stereotype perpetuation through language. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 79-121). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16.
Maass, A., Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., & Semin, G. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 57, 981-993.
17.
Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
18.
Moscatelli, S., Albarello, F., & Rubini, M. (2008). Linguistic discrimination in minimal groups: The impact of status differentials. Journal of Language and Social Psychology.
19.
Moskowitz, G.B., Li, P., & Kirk, E.R. (2004). The implicit volition model: On the preconscious regulation of temporarily adopted goals. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 317-414). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20.
Özgen, E. (2004). Language, learning, and color perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 95-98.
21.
Reitsma-van Rooijen, M., Semin, G.R., & van Leeuwen, E. (2007). The effects of linguistic abstraction on interpersonal distance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 817-823.
22.
Rubini, M., & Menegatti, M. (2008). Linguistic bias in personnel selection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology.
23.
Semin, G.R. (1998). Cognition, language, and communication. In S. R. Fussell & R. J. Kreuz (Eds), Social and cognitive psychological approaches to interpersonal communication (pp. 229-257). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
24.
Semin, G.R. (2000). Language as a cognitive and behavioral structuring resource: Question-answer exchanges. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 75-104). Chichester: Wiley.
25.
Semin, G.R. (2006). Modeling the architecture of linguistic behavior: Linguistic compositionality, automaticity, and control. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 246-255.
26.
Semin, G.R. (2007). Grounding communication: Synchrony. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 630-649). New York: Guilford Press.
27.
Semin, G.R., & De Poot, C.J. (1997). The question-answer paradigm: You might regret not noticing how a question is worded. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 472-480.
28.
Semin, G.R., & Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558-568.
29.
Semin, G.R. & Fiedler, K. (1991). The linguistic category model, its bases, applications and range. In Stroebe, W. & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1-30). Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley.
30.
Semin, G. R., & Smith, E. R. (Eds.). (2007). Introducing embodied grounding. Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Shallice, T. (1978). The dominant action system: An information-processing approach to consciousness. In K. S. Pope & J. L. Singer (Eds.), The stream of consciousness (pp. 105-138). New York: Plenum.
32.
Smith, E.R., & Semin, G.R. (2004). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , 36, 53-117.
33.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
34.
Stahlberg, D., Sczesny, S., & Braun, F. (2001). Name your favorite musician: Effects of masculine generics and of their alternatives in German. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20, 464-469.
35.
Stapel, D., & Semin, G.R. (2007). The magic spell of language: Linguistic categories and their perceptual consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 23-33.
36.
Von Hippel, W., Sekaquaptewa, D., & Vargas, P. (1997). The linguistic intergroup bias as an implicit indicator of prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 33, 490-509.
37.
von Humboldt, W. (1971). Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachaufbaues und ihren Einfluß auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts [Linguistic variability and intellectual development] (G. C. Buck & F. Raven, Trans.) .Baltimore: University of Miami Press. (Original work published 1836)
38.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
Wenneker, C.P.J., Wigboldus, D.H.J., & Spears, R. (2005). Biased language use in stereotype maintenance: The role of encoding and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 504-516.
40.
Wertsch, J.V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
Wertsch J.V. (1994). The primacy of mediated action in sociocultural studies. Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal , 1, 202-288.
42.
Whorf, B. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
Wigboldus, D.H.J., & Douglas, K.M. (2007). Language, stereotypes, and intergroup relations . In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 79-106). New York: Psychology Press.
44.
Wigboldus, D.H.J., Semin, G.R., & Spears, R. (2000). How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic biases and inferential consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 5-18.
