Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

People think of things to say that they have never thought (or heard, or seen) before. Ideational dynamics is concerned with the processes that give rise to the ideas that shape overt verbal and nonverbal behavior. The focus of this article is on three specific problems of ideational dynamics: How do message-content ideations arise? What is the nature of these ideations as cognitive entities? and How do these ideations come to be manifested in overt behavior? This article overviews the implications of one particular theory, second generation action assembly theory (AAT2), for addressing these problems. AAT2 suggests that message-content ideations need not be propositional, that the abstract conceptions one is conscious of may not be related to the propositional content of his or her speech, that abstract conceptions need not be conscious to impact overt behavior, that message-relevant ideations may fail to be expressed in actual behavior, and that message-relevant ideations are malleable on a time scale shorter than is required for their enactment.

Keywords

action assembly theory executive processes ideational dynamics message production

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, J. R. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review, 85, 249-277.

Bock, J. K. (1982). Toward a cognitive theory of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formation. Psychological Review, 89, 1-47.

Bradac, J. J. (Ed.). (1989). Message effects in communication science. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Bradac, J. J. , Konsky, C. W. , & Davies, R. A. (1976). Two studies of the effects of linguistic diversity upon judgments of communicator attributes and message effectiveness. Communication Monographs, 43, 70-79.

Carter, R. (2004). Language and creativity: The art of common talk. London: Routledge.

Chafe, W. L. (1977). Creativity in verbalization and its implications for the nature of stored knowledge. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension(pp. 41-55). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Chafe, W. (1990). Some things that narrative tell us about the mind. In B. K. Britton & A. D. Pellegrini (Eds.), Narrative thought and narrative language(pp. 79-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Clark, E. V. (1997). Conceptual perspective and lexical choice in acquisition. Cognition, 64, 1-37.

Coulmas, F. (Ed.). (1981). Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.

10.

Dell, G. S. , Schwartz, M. F. , Martin, N. , Saffran, E. M. , & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801-838.

11.

Flanagan, O. J., Jr. (1991). The science of the mind(2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

12.

Greene, J. O. (1984). A cognitive approach to human communication: An action assembly theory. Communication Monographs, 51, 289-306.

13.

Greene, J. O. (1990). Tactical social action: Towards some strategies for theory. In M. J. Cody & M. L. McLaughlin (Eds.), The psychology of tactical communication(pp. 31-47). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

14.

Greene, J. O. (1997). A second generation action assembly theory. In J. O. Greene (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory(pp. 151-170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

15.

Greene, J. O. (2000). Evanescent mentation: An ameliorative conceptual foundation for research and theory on message production. Communication Theory, 10, 139-155.

16.

Greene, J. O. , & Graves, A. R. (in press). Cognitive models of message production. In D. Roskos-Ewoldsen & J. Monahan (Eds.), Communication and social cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

17.

Greene, J. O. , Kirch, M. W. , & Grady, C. S. (2000). Cognitive foundations of message encoding: An investigation of message production as coalition formation. Communication Quarterly, 48, 256-271.

18.

Hample, D. (2004, May). Inventional capacity: Conceptualization, operationalization, and findings. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.

19.

Herrmann, T. (1983). Speech and situation: A psychological conception of situated speaking. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

20.

Kellermann, K. (1995). The conversation MOP: A model of patterned and pliable behavior. In D. E. Hewes (Ed.), The cognitive bases of interpersonal communication(pp. 181-221). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

21.

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.

22.

Levelt, W. J. M. , Roelofs, A. , & Meyer, A. S. (1999). Atheory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.

23.

MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer-Verlag.

24.

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

25.

Osgood, C. E. , & Bock, J. K. (1977). Salience and sentencing: Some production principles. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Sentence production: Developments in research and theory(pp. 89-140). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

26.

Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Improvised dialogues: Emergence and creativity in conversation. Westport, CT: Ablex.

27.

Vallacher, R. R. , & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3-15.

Have I Got Something to Tell You

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References