This article discusses the ways in which ethnic minority and majority group members account, in an interview context, for the existence of discrimination in Dutch society. Taking a discursive approach, the focus is on the strategies used to describe and explain discrimination.In both groups,certain members were found to use discursive strategies questioning the omnipresence of discrimination and problematizing its causes,whereas others employed devices that made discrimination appear factual, with the Dutch as its main agents. The use of these strategies was examined in relation to subject positions that the participants took up throughout the interview. It is concluded that the discursive strategies used can be understood in relation to the way speakers position themselves within particular discourses. Hence, similar discursive strategies function in different ways in different contexts, and both mainstream and discourse analytical studies on discrimination should not start from a simple majority-minority dichotomy.
Abell,J.,& Stokoe,E.H.(2001).Broadcasting the royal role:Constructing culturally situated identities in the Princess Diana Panorama interview. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 417-435.
2.
Antaki, C., Condor, S., & Levine, M. (1996). Social identities in talk: Speakers’ own orientations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 473-492.
3.
Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identies in talk. London: Sage.
4.
Augoustinos, M., LeCouteur, A., & Soylan, J. (2002). Self-sufficient arguments in political rhetoric: Constructing reconciliation and apologizing to the stolen generations. Discourse and Society, 13, 105-142.
5.
Baker, C. D. (1997). Membership categorization and interview accounts. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research:Theory,method and practice (pp.130-143). London: Sage.
6.
Bekerman, Z. (2002). The discourse of nation and culture: Its impact on Palestinian-Jewish encounters in Israel. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26, 409-427.
7.
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Billig, M. (1997). The dialogical unconscious: Psychoanalysis, discursive psychology and the nature of repression. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 139-160.
9.
Billig, M. (1999). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse and Society, 10, 543-582.
10.
Bonilla-Silva, E., & Forman, T. A. (2000). “I am not a racist but...”: Mapping White college students’ racial ideology in the USA. Discourse and Society, 11, 50-85.
11.
Brewer, M. B., & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 554-594). New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Burr, V. (2002). The person in social psychology. New York: Taylor & Francis.
13.
Cameron, D. (1998). Gender, language and discourse:A review essay. Signs, 23, 945-973.
14.
Celious, A., & Oyserman, D. (2001). Race from the inside: An emerging heterogeneous race model. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 149-165.
15.
Condor, S. (2000). “Pride and prejudice”: Management in English people’s talk about “this country”. Discourse and Society, 11, 175-205.
16.
Crossley, M. L. (2000). Introducing narrative psychology: Self, trauma and the construction of meaning. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
17.
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20, 43-63.
18.
De Cillia,R.,Reisigl,R.,& Wodak,R.(1999).The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse and Society, 10, 149-173.
19.
Dickerson, P. (2000). “But I’m different to them”: Constructing contrasts between self and others in talk-in-interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 381-398.
20.
Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1989). Complaining matters: The use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems, 35, 501-520.
21.
Duckitt, J. (1994). The social psychology of prejudice. London: Praeger.
22.
Edley,N.(2001).Analysing masculinity:Interpretative repertoires,ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 189-228). London: Sage.
23.
Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.
24.
Edwards, D. (1998). The relevant thing about her: Social identity categories in use. In C. Antaki & A. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 15-33). London: Sage.
25.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
26.
Essed, P. (1991). Understanding everyday racism: An interdisciplinary theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Frosh, S., Phoenix, A., & Pattman, R. (2003). Taking a stand: Using psychoanalysis to explore the positioning of subjects in discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 39-53.
28.
Harré, R., & Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
29.
Hollway, W. (1989). Subjectivity and method in psychology: Gender, meaning and science. London: Sage.
30.
Jefferson, G. (1990). List construction as a task and resource. In G. Psathas & R. Frankel (Eds.), Interaction competence (pp. 63-92). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 254-263.
32.
Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & McCoy, S. K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 251-330). New York: Academic Press.
33.
McAdams, D. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. New York: Morrow.
34.
McVittie, C., McKinlay, A., & Widdicombe, S. (2003). Committed to (un)equal opportunities?: “New ageism” and the older worker. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 595-612.
35.
Ogbu, J. (1993). Differences in cultural frame of reference. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 16, 483-506.
36.
Oyserman, D., & Swim, J. K. (2001). Stigma: An insider’s view. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 1-14.
37.
Parker, I. (1997). Discourse analysis and psychoanalysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 479-495.
38.
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn-shapes.In J.M.Atkinson & J.Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action:Studies in conversational analysis (pp.57-101).Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A new way of legitimating claims. Human Studies, 9, 219-230.
40.
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
41.
Rapley, M. (2001). “How to do X without doing Y”: Accomplishing discrimination without “being racist”—”doing equity”. In M. Augoustinos & K. Reynolds (Eds.), Understanding prejudice, racism, and social conflict (pp. 231-251). London: Sage.
42.
Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. (2002). The meaning and consequences of perceived discrimination in disadvantaged and privileged social groups. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 167-199). London: Wiley.
43.
Shelton, J. N. (2000). A reconceptualization of how we study issues of racial prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 374-390.
44.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Speer, S. A., & Potter, J. (2000). The management of heterosexist talk: Conversational resources and prejudiced claims. Discourse and Society, 11, 543-572.
46.
Stapleton, K., & Wilson, J. (2003). Grounding the discursive self: A case study in ISA and discursive psychology. In P. Weinreich & W. Saunderson (Eds.), Analysing identity: Cross-cultural, societal and clinical contexts (pp. 195-212). London: Routledge.
47.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
48.
Taylor, D. M., Wright, S. C., & Porter, L. E. (1993). Dimensions of perceived discrimination: The personal/group discrimination discrepancy. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 233-256). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
Törrönen, J. (2001). The concept of subject position in empirical social research. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 31, 313-329.
50.
Triandafyllidou, A. (2000). The political discourse on immigration in southern Europe: A critical analysis. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 10,373-389.
51.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1984). Prejudice in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
52.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1992). Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse and Society, 3, 87-118.
53.
Van Langenhove, L., & Harré, R. (1994). Cultural stereotypes and positioning theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 24, 359-372.
54.
Verkuyten, M. (1997). Discourses of ethnic minority identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 565-586.
55.
Verkuyten, M. (2001). “Abnormalization” of ethnic minorities in conversation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 257-278.
56.
Verkuyten, M., & De Wolf, A. (2002). Being, feelings and doing: Discourses and ethnic self-definitions among minority group members. Culture and Psychology, 8,371-399.
57.
Waters,M.(1994).Ethnic and racial identities in second-generation Black immigrants in New York City. International Migration Review, 28, 795-820.
58.
Weltman,D.,& Billig, M. (2002). The political psychology of contemporary anti-politics:A discursive approach to the end-of-ideology. Political Psychology, 22, 367-382.
59.
Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9, 431-456.
60.
Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism. Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
