Individuals in two studies listened to statements or questions that were either consistent or inconsistent across verbal content and tone of voice. Results showed that tone of voice substantially affected judges’ ratings of the politeness for positive content statements but did so only minimally for negative content statements. Tone of voice affected judges’ politeness ratings of both positive and negative questions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ambady, N., Bernieri, F. J., & Richeson, J. A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from think slices of the behavioral stream. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 201-271.
2.
Ambady, N., Koo, J., Lee, F., & Rosenthal, R. (1996). More than words: Linguistic and nonlinguistic politeness in two cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 996-1011.
3.
Baxter, L. A. (1984). An investigation of compliance-gaining as politeness. Human Communication Research, 10, 427-456.
4.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness (pp. 56-311). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Brown, R. (1990). Politeness theory: Exemplar and exemplary. In I. Rock (Ed.), The legacy of Solomon Asch: Essays in cognition and social psychology (pp. 23-38). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Camras, L. A. (1984). Children’s verbal and nonverbal communication in a conflict situation. Ethology and Sociobiology, 5, 257-268.
8.
DePaulo, B. M., & Friedman, H. S. (1998). Nonverbal communication. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 3-39). New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Dovidio, J. F., & Ellyson, S. L. (1985). Patterns of visual dominance behavior in humans. In S. Ellyson & J. Dovidio (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 129-149). New York: Springer-Verlag.
10.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face to face behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor & Doubleday.
11.
Hall, J. A. (1990). Nonverbal gender differences: Accuracy of communication and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12.
Holtgraves, T. (1997). Politeness and memory for the wording of remarks. Memory and Cognition, 25, 106-116.
13.
Koo, J. (1995). Politeness theory: Universality and specificity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
14.
LaPlante, D., & Ambady, N. (2002). Saying it like it isn’t: Responding to mixed messages from men and women in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2435-2457.
15.
Lee, F. (1995). When the going gets tough, do the tough ask for help? The antecedents, process, and outcomes of help seeking behaviors in organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
16.
Loveday, L. (1981). Pitch, politeness and sexual role: An exploratory investigation into the pitch correlates of English and Japanese politeness formulae. Language and Speech, 24, 71-89.
17.
Robins, L. S., & Wolf, F. M. (1988). Confrontation and politeness strategies in physician/ patient interactions. Social Science and Medicine, 27, 217-221.
18.
Solomon, D., & Ali, F. A. (1975). Influence of verbal content and intonation on meaning attributions of first-and-second language speakers. Journal of Social Psychology, 95, 3-8.
19.
Trees, A. R., & Manusov, V. (1998). Managing face concerns in criticism: Integrating non-verbal behaviors as a dimension of politeness in female friendship dyads. Human Communication Research, 24, 564-583.
