Fear appeal, as a tactic of persuasion, has been studied mostly from an experimental
and nondiscursive perspective. The aim of this study is to examine the use of fear
appeal in a natural discursive setting of fundamentalist rhetoric. More
specifically, the authors examine the interactional problems facing Jewish
fundamentalist preachers who try to manipulate fear. In addition, the authors
identify several discursive strategies that aim to solve these problems. The general
conclusions point to the power of a discursive perspective for examining fear appeal
and its sophisticated use in rhetoric and present a new vision for the study of
discourse and psychology.
Axelrod, R.
(1997). Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences. Complexity, 3,
16-22.
2.
Bekerman, Z.
, & Neuman, Y. (2001). Joining their betters rather than their own: The modern/postmodern rhetoric
of Jewish fundamentalist preachers. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 25,
184-199.
3.
Billig, M.
(1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social
psychology. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
4.
Billig, M.
(2001). Humor and embarrassment: Limits of "nice-guy"
theories of social life. Theory, Culture and Society, 18(5),
23-43.
5.
Brown, P.
, & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
6.
Cohen, I.
(2000). Tending Adam's garden.
New York: Academic
Press.
7.
Janis, I.L.
(1967). Effects of fear arousal on attitude change: Recent
development in theory and experimental finding. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology 3.
New York: Academic
Press.
8.
Harre, R.
, & Gillett, G. (1995). The discursive mind.
London: Sage
Ltd.
9.
Lakoff, G.
, & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its
challenge to Western thought. New York:
Basic Books.
10.
Leventhal, H.
(1970). Finding and theory in the study of fear
communications. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology 5.
New York: Academic
Press.
11.
Mingers, J.
(1995). Self-producing systems. New
York: Plenum.
12.
Neuman, Y.
(2002). A co-generic perspective on problems involving a shift between
systems' different levels of analysis. International Journal of General Systems, 31,
111-118.
13.
Neuman, Y. (in press). Co-generic logic as a theoretical framework for the
analysis of communication in living systems. Semiotica.
14.
Neuman, Y.
, Bekerman, Z., & Kaplan, A. (2002). Rhetoric as the contextual manipulation off self and non-self. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35,
93-113.
15.
Neuman, Y.
, Lurie, Y., & Rosental, M. (2001). A watermelon without seeds: A case study in rhetorical rationality. Text, 21,
543-565.
16.
Perelman, C.H.
, & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation.
London: University of Notre Dame
Press.
17.
Reicher, S.
, & Hopkins, N. (1996). Seeking influence through characterizing self-categories: An analysis of
anti-abortionist rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35,
297-311.
18.
Reicher, S.
, & Hopkins, N. (2001). Self and nation.
London: Sage
Ltd.
19.
Rogers, R.W.
(1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Psychology, 91,
93-114.
20.
Rogers, R.W.
(1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear
appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation.
In J. Cacioppo & R. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology. New
York: Guilford.
21.
Schoenbachler, D.D.
, & Whittler, T.E. (1996). Adolescent processing of social and physical threat communication. Journal of Advertising, 25,
37-54.
22.
Sebeok, T.
, & Danesi, M. (2000). The forms of meaning.
Berlin: Mouton de
Gruyter.
23.
Tanner, J.F.
, Hunt, J.B., & Eppright, D.R. (1991). The protection motivation model: A normative model of fear appeals. Journal of Marketing, 55,
36-45.
24.
Tracy, K.
(1995). Action implicative discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14,
195-215.
25.
Tracy, K.
(2002). Everyday talk: Building and reflecting
identities. New York:
Guilford.
26.
Tracy, K.
, & Anderson, D.L. (1999). Relational positioning strategies in police calls: A dilemma. Discourse Studies, 1,
201-225.
27.
Trafimow, D.
, Silverman, E.S., Mei-Tai Fan, R., & Shui Fun Law, J. (1997). The effects of language and priming on the relative accessibility of the
private self and the collective self. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28,
107-123.
28.
Volosinov, V.N.
(1986). Marxism and the philosophy of language.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
