Two studies investigated interactions between health providers and patients, using Semin and Fiedler’s linguistic category model. In Study 1 the linguistic category model was used to examine perceptions of the levels of linguistic intergroup bias in descriptions of conversations with health professionals in hospitals. Results indicated a favourable linguistic bias toward health professionals in satisfactory conversations but low levels of linguistic intergroup bias in unsatisfactory conversations. In Study 2, the language of patients and health professionals in videotaped interactions was examined for levels of linguistic intergroup bias. Interpersonally salient interactions showed less linguistic intergroup bias than did intergroup ones. Results also indicate that health professionals have high levels of control in all types of medical encounters with patients. Nevertheless, the extent to which patients are able to interact with health professionals as individuals, rather than only as professionals, is a key determinant of satisfaction with the interaction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arcuri, L.
, Maass, A., & Portelli, G. (1993). Linguistic intergroup bias and implicit attributions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 277-285.
2.
Au, T. K.
(1986). A verb is worth a thousand words: The causes and consequences of interpersonal events implicit in language. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 104-122.
3.
Brown, R.
, & Fish, D. (1983). The psychological causality implicit in language. Cognition, 14, 237-273.
4.
Coulthard, M.
, & Ashby, M. (1975). Talking with the doctor, 1. Journal of Communication, 25, 140-147.
5.
Dryden, C.
, & Giles, H. (1987). Language, social identity and health. In H. Beloff & A. M. Coleman (Eds.), Psychology Survey 6 (pp. 115-139). Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.
6.
Feeney, J. A.
, & Noller, P. (1991). Attachment style and verbal descriptions of romantic partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 187-215.
7.
Fiedler, K.
, Semin, G. R., & Finkenauer, C. (1993). The battle of words between gender groups: A language-based approach to intergroup processes. Human Communication Research, 19, 409-441.
8.
Fiedler, K.
, Semin, G. R., Finkenauer, C., & Berkel, I. (1995). Actor-observer bias in close relationships: The role of self-knowledge and self-related language. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 525-538.
9.
Fiedler, K.
, Semin, G. R., & Koppetsch, C. (1991). Language use and attributional biases in close personal relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 147-155.
10.
Fisher, S.
(1983). Doctor talk/patient talk: How treatment decisions are negotiated in doctor-patient communication. In S. Fisher & A. D. Todd (Eds.), The social organization of doctor-patient communication (pp. 35-157). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
11.
Gallois, C.
, & Giles, H. (1998). Accommodating mutual influence in intergroup encounters. In M. T. Palmer & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), Mutual influence in interpersonal communication: Theory and research in cognition, affect and behavior (pp. 130-162). New York: Ablex.
12.
Gallois, C.
, Giles, H., Jones, E., Cargile, A., & Ota, H. (1995). Accommodating intercultural encounters: Elaborations and extensions. In R. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural and international communication annual: Intercultural communication theory (pp. 115-147). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Gardner, M. J.
, Paulsen, N., Gallois, C., Callan, V. J., & Monaghan, P. (2001). Communication in organizations: An intergroup perspective. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 561-584). London: Wiley.
14.
Giles, H.
, Coupland, J., & Coupland, N. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1-68). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Hogg, M. A.
, & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications. London: Routledge.
16.
Maass, A.
, & Arcuri, L. (1992). The role of language in the persistence of stereotypes. In G. R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 129-143). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Maass, A.
, Ceccarelli, R., & Rudin, S. (1996). Linguistic intergroup bias: Evidence for in-group-protective motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 512-526.
18.
Maass, A.
, Milesi, A., Zabbini, S., & Stahlberg, D. (1995). Linguistic intergroup bias: Differential expectancies or in-group protection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 116-126.
19.
Maass, A.
, Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., & Semin, G. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981-993.
20.
Ng, S. K.
, & Chan, K. K. (1996). Biases in the description of various age groups: A linguistic category model analysis. Bulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society, 36/37, 5-20.
21.
Oakes, P. J.
, Haslam, A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
22.
Pettegrew, L. S.
, & Logan, R. (1987). The health care context. In C. Berger & S. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp.675-710). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
Schmid, J.
, & Fiedler, K. (1996). Language and implicit attributions in the Nuremberg trials. Human Communication Research, 22, 371-398.
24.
Schmid, J.
, Fielder, K., Semin, G. R., & Englich, B. (1994). Measuring implicit causality: The linguistic category model. Unpublished manuscript.
25.
Semin, G. R.
, & Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558-568.
26.
Semin, G. R.
, & Fiedler, K., (1989). Relocating attributional phenomena within a languagecognition interface: The case of actors’ and observers’ perspectives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 491-508.
27.
Semin, G. R.
, & Fiedler, K. (1991). The linguistic category model, its bases, applications, and range. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 1-30.
28.
Semin, G. R.
, & Fiedler, K. (1992). Properties of interpersonal language and attribution. In G. R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 58-77). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Sharf, B. F.
, & Street, R. L., Jr. (1997). The patient as a central construct: Shifting the emphasis. Health Communication, 9, 1-11.
30.
Shuy, R. W.
(1977). The patient’s right to clear communication in health and mental health delivery service. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 1-25.
31.
Street, R. L., Jr.
(1991). Accommodation in medical consultations. In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 131-156). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Street, R. L., Jr.
, & Buller, D. B. (1987). Nonverbal response patterns in physician-patient interactions: A functional analysis. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 234-253.
33.
Tabachnick, B. G.
, & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: HarperCollins.
34.
Tajfel, H.
(1975). The exit of social mobility and the voice of social change: Notes on the social psychology of intergroup relations. Social Science Information, 14, 101-118.
35.
Tajfel, H.
(1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), European monographs in social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 61-67). London: Academic Press.
36.
Tajfel, H.
(1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
37.
Tajfel, H.
, & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology and intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
38.
Thompson, T. L.
(1994). Interpersonal communication and health care. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 696-725). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Watson, B.
, & Gallois, C. (1998). Nurturing communication by health professionals toward patients: A communication accommodation theory approach. Health Communication, 10, 343-355.
40.
Watson, B.
, & Gallois, C. (1999). Communication accommodation between patients and health professionals: Themes and strategies in satisfying and unsatisfying encounters. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9, 167-184.
