This article reports on two experiments waith native speakers of German that were conducted to determine the influence of different types of German generics on the cognitive inclusion of women. The results of these studies show that masculine versus other types of generics influence the retrieval of male and female exemplars from memory. This is the first piece of empirical evidence for this kind of effect with regard to the German language.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Braun, F.
, Gottburgsen, A., Sczesny, S., & Stahlberg, D. (1998). Können Geophysiker Frauen sein? Generische Personenbezeichnungen im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 26, 265-283.
2.
Grabrucker, M.
(1993). Vater Staat hat keine Muttersprache. Frankfurt, Germany: Fischer.
3.
Hamilton, M. C.
, Hunter, B., & Stuart-Smith, S. (1992). Jury instructions worded in the masculine generic: Can a woman claim self-defense when “he” is threatened? In J. C. Chrisler & D. Howard (Eds.), New directions in feminist psychology: Practice, theory, and research (pp. 169-178). New York: Springer.
4.
Irmen, L.
, & Kaczmarek, N. (2000, September). Beeinflusst das grammatische Geschlecht die Repräsentation von Personen in einem mentalen Modell? Ein Vergleich zwischen einer englischsprachigen und einer deutschsprachigen Stichprobe. Poster presented at the 42nd Congress of the German Psychological Association, University of Jena.
5.
Irmen, L.
, & Köhncke, A. (1996). Zur Psychologie des “generischen” Maskulinums. Sprache & Kognition, 15, 152-166.
6.
Konishi, T.
(1993). The semantics of grammatical gender: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 519-534.
7.
Miller, C.
, & Swift, K. (1977). Words and women: New language in new times. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
8.
Moulton, J.
, Robinson, G. M., & Elias, C. (1978). Sex bias in language use: “Neutral pronouns that aren’t.”American Psychologist, 33, 1032-1036.
9.
Prentice, D. A.
(1994). Do language reforms change our way of thinking?Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 3-19.
10.
Scheele, B.
, & Gauler, E. (1993). Wählen Wissenschaftler ihre Probleme anders aus als WissenschaftlerInnen? Das Genus-Sexus-Problem als paradigmatischer Fall der linguistischen Relativitätsthese. Sprache & Kognition, 12, 59-72.
11.
Zubin, D. A.
, & Köpcke, K. M. (1984). Affect classification in the German gender system. Lingua, 63, 41-96.
