This research explored how basic semantic dimensions of evaluation, potency, and activity influence attributions of who causes an interpersonal event. Two experiments examined how the dimensions affected (a) college students’ judgments about which particular social identities were better agents or patients for generic positive and negative actions and (b) their judgments about who caused specific actions described by sentences containing the same identities. The semantic characteristics of the nouns and verbs and “goodness of thematic role” accounted for 44% of the variance in attribution judgments. Experiment 3 examined the effects of evaluation and potency on state verbs. Attributions were again made to the thematic role whose traits matched the valence of the state’s evaluation. More potent subjects and more potent verbs elicited stronger attributions. Thus, basic dimensions of affective meaning that underlie the words used to describe interpersonal interactions help account for observers’ judgments of who is responsible for those events.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Au, T. K. F.
(1986). A verb is worth a thousand words: The causes and consequences of interpersonal events implied in language. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 104-122.
2.
Bates, E.
, & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 173-218). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Bestgen
(1994). Can emotional valence in stories be determined from words?Cognition and Emotion, 8, 21-36.
4.
Brown, R.
, & Fish, D. (1983). The psychological causality implicit in language. Cognition, 14, 237-273.
5.
Brown, R.
, & Van Kleek, M. (1989). Enough said: Three principles of explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 590-604.
6.
Clark, H.
(1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
7.
Conte, H.
, & Plutchik, R. (1981). A circumplex model for interpersonal personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 701-711.
8.
Corrigan, R.
(1988). Who dun it? The influence of actor-patient animacy and type of verb in the making of causal attributions. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 447-465.
9.
Corrigan, R.
(1992). The relationship between causal attributions and judgments of the typicality of events described by sentences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 351-368.
10.
Corrigan, R.
(1993). Causal attributions to states and events described by different classes of verbs. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 335-348.
11.
Fiedler, K.
, & Semin, G. (1988). On the causal information conveyed by different interpersonal verbs: The role of implicit sentence context. Social Cognition, 6, 21-39.
12.
Fiedler, K.
, Semin, G., Ritter, A., Bode, P., & Manderbach, M. (1997). A context grammar approach to understanding the causal impact of interpersonal verbs. Unpublished manuscript.
13.
Francis, W.
, & Kuçera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
14.
Garnham, A.
(1994). Future directions. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 1123-1144). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15.
Garvey, K.
, & Caramazza, A. (1974). Implicit causality in verbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 459-464.
16.
Garvey, K.
, Caramazza, A., & Yates, J. (1976). Factors influencing assignments of pronoun antecedents. Cognition, 3, 227-243.
17.
Gollob. H.
(1974). A subject-verb-object approach to social cognition. Psychological Review, 81, 286-321.
18.
Gollob, H.
, & Fisher, G. (1973). Some relationships between social inference, cognitive balance, and change in impression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 16-22.
19.
Gollob, H.
, & Rossman, B. (1973). Judgments of an actor’s “power and ability to influence others. ”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 391-406.
20.
Greene, S.
, & McKoon, G. (1995). Can’t know: Experimental approaches to verbs exhibiting implicit causality. Psychological Science, 6, 262-270.
21.
Heider, F.
(1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21, 107-112.
22.
Heider, F.
(1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
23.
Heise, D.
(1979). Understanding events: Affect and the construction of social action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Heise, D.
(1992). Affect control theory and impression formation. In E. Borgatta & M. Borgatta (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Sociology (Vol. 1, pp. 12-17). New York: Macmillan.
25.
Kelley, H.
(1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 15, 192-238.
26.
LaFrance, M.
, Brownell, H., & Hahn, E. (1997). Interpersonal verbs, gender, and implicit causality. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 138-152.
27.
MacKinnon, N.
(1994). Symbolic interactionism as affect control theory. Albany: State University of New York Press.
28.
Manetti, L.
, & DeGrada, E. (1991). Interpersonal verbs: Implicit causality of action verbs and contextualized factors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 429-443.
29.
McArthur, L.
(1972). The how and what of why: Some determinants and consequences of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 1047-1054.
30.
McRae, K.
, Ferretti, T., & Amyote, L. (1997). Thematic roles as verb-specific concepts. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 137-176.
31.
Osgood, C.
, May, W., & Miron, M. (1975). Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
32.
Osgood, C.
, Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
33.
Reeve, J.
(1997). Understanding motivation and emotion. Ft. Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
34.
Rudolph, U.
, & Forsterling, F. (1997). The psychological causality implicit in verbs: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 192-218.
35.
Semin, G. R.
, & Fiedler, K. (1992). The inferential properties of interpersonal verbs. In G. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction, and social cognition. London: Sage.
36.
Semin, G. R.
, & Marsman, J. (1994). Multiple inference inviting properties of interpersonal verbs: Event instigation, dispositional inference, and implicit causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 836-849.
37.
Stubbs. M.
(1996). Text and corpus analysis. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
38.
Vonk, R.
(1993a). Individual differences and common dimensions in implicit personality theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 209-226.
39.
Vonk, R.
(1993b). The negativity effect in trait ratings and in open-ended descriptions of persons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 269-278.
40.
Vonk, R.
(1994). Trait inferences, impression formation, and person memory: Strategies in processing inconsistent information about persons. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 111-149.
41.
Vonk, R.
(1995). Effects of inconsistent behaviors on person impressions: A multidimensional study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 674-685.
42.
Vonk, R.
(1996). Negativity and potency effects in impression formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 851-863.
43.
Wiggins, J.
, & Pincus, A. (1992). Personality: Structure and assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 473-504.
