It has been argued that linguistic masking devices can create different versions of reality. This study investigated whether systematic language shifts using three of these lower level devices (permutation, truncation, and generalization) influenced people’s perceptions. One hundred and ninety-three students participated in an attribution experiment in which each person read a brief news story based on an actual Navy clash between South and North Korea. A 2×2×2 analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated that serial prominence, abstract language, and truncation produced greater attributions of responsibility as well as influenced impressions of aggressiveness and status. The results confirmed that linguistic masking holds consequences for perceived reality. The study concludes with a discussion of practical implications for news reporting and writing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bargh, J.
, Chaiken, S., Govender, R., & Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893-912.
2.
Chaiken, S.
, Wood, W., & Eagly, A. (1996). Principles of persuasion. In E. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology handbook of basic principles (pp. 702-742). New York: Guilford Press.
3.
Cole, T.
, & Leets, L. (1998). Linguistic masking devices and intergroup behavior: Further evidence of an intergroup linguistic bias. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 348-371.
4.
Entman, R.
(1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58.
5.
Fairhurst, G.
, & Sarr, R. (1996). The art of framing: Managing the language of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Fasold, R.
(1987). The sociolinguistics of society. New York: Basil Blackwell.
7.
Fedler, F.
, Bender, J., Davenport, L., & Kostyu, P. (1997). Reporting for the media (6th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
8.
Fowler, R.
, & Kress, G. (1979). Critical linguistics. In R. Fowler, B. Hodge, G. Kress, & T. Trew (Eds.), Language and control (pp. 185-213). London: Routledge.
9.
Giles, H.
, & St. Clair, R. (Eds.). (1979). Language and social psychology. New York: Basil Blackwell.
10.
Giles, H.
, & Wiemann, J. (1985). Language, social comparison, and power. In C. Berger & S. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp. 350-384). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Gills, B.
(1995). Prospects for peace and stability in Northeast Asia: The Korean conflict. London: Research Institute for the Study of Conflict and Terrorism.
12.
Goffman, E.
(1974). Frame analysis. New York: Free Press.
13.
Hamilton, D.
(1981). Cognitive representations of persons. In E. Higgins, C. Herman, & M. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (pp. 135-159). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Henley, N.
, Miller, M., & Beazley, J. (1995). Syntax, semantics, and sexual violence: Agency and the passive voice. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 60-84.
15.
Hewstone, M.
(1983). The role of language in attribution processes. In J. Jaspars, F. Fincham, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Attribution theory and research: Conceptual, developmental, and social dimensions (pp. 241-259). London: Academic Press.
16.
Hinchman, L.
, & Hinchman, S. (1997). Memory, identity, community: The idea of narrative in the human sciences. New York: State University of New York Press.
17.
Howard, J.
(1987). The conceptualization and measurement of attributions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 32-58.
18.
Jackson, S.
(1992). Message effects research: Principles of design and analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
19.
Jaspars, J.
, Fincham, F., & Hewstone, M. (Eds.). (1983). Attribution theory and research: Conceptual, developmental, and social dimensions. London: Academic Press.
20.
Johnson, B.
, & Eagly, A. (1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 290-314.
21.
Leckie, R.
(1996). Conflict: The history of the Korean War, 1950-53. New York: Da Capo Press.
22.
Leets, L.
, & Bowers, P. (1999). Loud and angry voices: The insidious influence. Communication Monographs, 66, 325-340.
23.
Maass, A.
, & Arcuri, L. (1996). Language and stereotyping. In N. Macrae, M. Hewstone, & C. Stangor (Eds.), The foundations of stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 193-226). New York: Guilford Press.
24.
Maass, A.
, Ceccarelli, R., & Rudin, S. (1996). Linguistic intergroup bias: Evidence for in-group-protective motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 512-526.
25.
Maass, A.
, Milesi, A., Zabbini, S., & Stahlberg, D. (1995). Linguistic intergroup bias: Differential expectancies or in-group protection?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 116-126.
26.
Maass, A.
, Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., & Semin, G. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981-993.
27.
Mencher, M.
(1997). News reporting and writing (7th ed.). Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark Publishers.
28.
Ng, S.
, & Bradac, J. (1993). Power in language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
O’Keefe, B.
(1990). Persuasion: Theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Petty, R.
, & Cacioppo, J. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
31.
Russell, D.
(1982). The causal dimension scale: A measure of how individuals perceive causes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1137-1145.
32.
Russell, D.
, McAuley, E., & Tarico, V. (1987). Measuring causal attributions for success and failure: A comparison of methodologies for assessing causal dimensions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1248-1257.
33.
Semin, G.
, & Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons. Social Cognition and Language, 54, 558-568.
34.
Semin, G.
, & Fiedler, K. (1989). Relocating attributional phenomena within a language-cognition interface: The case of actors’ and observers’ perspectives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 491-508.
35.
Semin, G.
, & Fiedler, K. (1991). The linguistic category model, its bases, applications, and range. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1-50). Chichester, England: Wiley.
36.
Semin, G.
, & Fiedler, K. (1992). The inferential properties of interpersonal verbs. In G. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction, and social cognition (pp. 58-78). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Shaver, K.
, & Drown, D. (1986). On causality, responsibility, and self-blame: A theoretical note. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 697-702.
38.
Shin, P.
(1998, December 18). S. Korea Sinks N. Korean Sub. abcnews.go.com. Retrieved December 18, 1998, from the World Wide Web: http://abcnews.go.com/sections/world/DailyNews/korea_sub981217.html.
39.
Tabachnick, B.
, & L. Fidell (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
40.
Tajfel, H.
(Ed.). (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Tajfel, H.
, & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
42.
Tardy, C.
(Ed.). (1988). A handbook for the study of human communication: Methods and instruments for observing, measuring, and assessing communication processes. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
43.
Weiner, B.
(1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3-25.
44.
Zahn, C.
, & Hopper, R. (1985). Measuring language attitudes: The speech evaluation instrument. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 4, 113-123.
