An Analysis of Selected Descriptive and Experimental Studies on Program Model Designs for Gifted Students for Potential use in Rural School Districts of Developing Countries
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 1995
An Analysis of Selected Descriptive and Experimental Studies on Program Model Designs for Gifted Students for Potential use in Rural School Districts of Developing Countries
The purpose of this study was to analyse program model designs for gifted children and youth currently in use in the United States. From a meta-analysis of 100 descriptive and experimental studies conducted in the last 10 years trends and practices currently used in the United States were identified. Ten features of program design which included name and description: identification of students: funding: staffing: grades: ages and number of students: scheduling: delivery of services: role of parents: community and technology were examined. Further recommendations were derived for the implementation of similar programs and training of teachers for the gifted in developing countries specifically the provinces of Ciskei and Transkei, South Africa. Focus is provided on aspects of gifted programs in rural areas of the United States for those recommendations as the characteristics are more representative of those in developing countries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldrichF.W.MillsC.J. (1989). A special program for highly able rural youth in grades five and six. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33 (1) 11–14.
2.
BresciaD.A. (1988). Formula for a gifted program. Roeper Review, 11 (2) 64–66.
3.
GlassG.V.McGawB.SmithM.L. (1981). Metaanalysis in Social Research. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
4.
NaiduS.R. (1992). Conditions of Education in Rural South African Schools. SPED 580. Master's seminar on issues and trends in special education. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, Carbondale, III.
5.
PittsM. (1988). Developing a gifted program: Suggestions for rural school administrators. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 8, 23–26.
6.
RobersonT.G. (1984). Determining curriculum content for the gifted. Roeper Review, 6, (3) 137–138.
7.
SchaferS.M. (1989). People's education in South Africa. International Journal of Social Education, 4 (2) 60–68.
8.
SkuyM.GaydonV.HoffenbergS.FridjohnP. (1990). Predictors of performance of disadvantaged adolescents in a gifted program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31 (4) 155–157.
AcheyV.A.WoodsS.B. (1988). Increasing minority participation in the Greensboro Academically Gifted Program without changing entrance criteria. Greensboro City Public Schools. Greensboro: NC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 302 999)
11.
AldrichP.W.MillsC.J. (1989). A special program for highly able rural youth in grades 5 &6. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33 (1) 11–14.
12.
AlexanderM.E.RogersA.G. (1988). Joint efforts turn small budgets into big ideas. The American School Board Joumat, 175 (11) 28.
13.
AndersonM.A.KleinsasserA.M. (1986). Beliefs and attitudes of rural educators and their perceived skill level in using curriculum models for the education of gifted learners. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Rural and Small School Consortium, Bellingham: WA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 278 521)
14.
BaldwinA.V. (1987). I'm Black look at me, I am also gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, (4), 180–184.
15.
BarkerB.A. (1990). Distant education in small rural schools: Advantages and disadvantages. Rural Educator, 12, 4–7.
16.
BehrendtR.L. (1984). Honors programs and private funding, how one community college succeeded. Paper presented at the Convention of the American Association of Community and Junior Colleges. Washongton, D.C. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 244 682).
17.
BelcastroF.P. (1987). Elementary pull-out program for the intellectually gifted — Boon or bane? Roeper Review, 9 (4) 208–212.
18.
BinaM.J. (1987). Rural special education itinerant service delivery: Practical suggestions to overcome job realities and shortcomings. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 7, 20–26.
19.
BogueK.L.WolfJ.S. (1985). School and community in action. Roeper Review, 8 (2), 112–114.
20.
BresciaD.A. (1988) Building a new gifted program is like building a new house. Roeper Review, 11 (2) 64–66.
21.
BugaiA.M.BugaiC.K. (1986). Agricultural programs and gifted programs: A symbiosis. The Agricultural Education Magazine, 59 (6) 18–19.
22.
BullK.S. (1987). Gifted education in rural schools: An examination of alternatives. Journal of Rural and Small Schools, 2 (1) 29–35.
23.
BullK.S. (1987) Rural options for gifted education. ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. Char1eston: WV. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 284 716)
24.
BullK.S. (1988) Developing community resources to support rural gifted programs. Paper presented at the 8th Annual Conference of the American Council for Rural Special Educators. Monterey: CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 299 738).
25.
BullK.S.DavisC.R. (1988). Using the microcomputer with gifted and talented: Rural applications. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 8, 31–35.
26.
BullK.S.FishkinA. (1987). Should rural gifted education be different? A survey of teacher educators. Research in Rural Education, 4 (2) 73–75.
27.
CallahanC.M. (1982). Myth: There must be “winners” and “losers” in identification and programming. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26 (1) 17–19.
28.
CarranM. (1983). Developing a community based summer enrichment program. Roeper Review, 6 (2) 81–82.
ClasenD.R.ClasenR.F. (1989). Using telecommunications to meet the staff development and networking needs of educators of the gifted in small or rural school districts. Roeper Review, 11 (4) 202–205.
31.
ClasenD.R.SubkoviakM.J. (1982). College for kids: An innovative enrichment program for gifted elementary children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, New York: NY. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 217 558).
32.
CohenL.M. (1990). Meeting the needs of gifted and talented minority language students. The Council for Exceptional Children, Reston: VA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 321 485).
33.
CoxJ.DanielsN. (1984). Programming for excellence in the summer. GCT, (31) 54–60.
34.
CoxJ.DanielsN. (1984). The pull-out model. GCT (34) 55–60.
35.
DavidsonK. (1986). The case against formal identification. Gifted Child Today, 9 (6) 7–12.
36.
DelahantyR. (1984). Challenge, opportunity and frustration: Developing a gifted program for Kindergarteners. Roeper Review, 7 (3) 146–152.
DettmerP. (1989). An integrative model for educating very able students in rural school districts. Educational Considerations, 1736–39.
39.
DobeyD.C.JohnstonJ.R. (1988–89). Life beyond the classroom: A summer enrichment program in outdoor education and reading/language arts. Outdoor Communicator, 20, 21–24.
40.
DubnerF.S. (1984). IMPACT: A high school gifted program that works. Roeper Review, 7 (1) 41–43.
EiselenC.H.FoxM.M. (1990). Online database searches in gifted student independent study: Invesitgating the linits. Roeper Review, 13 (1) 45–51.
43.
ElizeyJ.T.KarnesF.A. (1991). Gifted education and rural youths: What parents and teachers should know. Giftsd Child Today, 14 (3) 56–57.
44.
EvansE.D.MarkenD. (1982). Multiple outcome assessment of special class placement for gifted students: A comparative study. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 217679)
45.
FeldhusenJ. (1982). Myth: Gifted education means having a program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26 (1) 37–41.
FeldhusenJ.F.SokolL. (1982). Extra school programming to meet the needs of gifted youth: Super Saturday. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26 (2) 51–57.
48.
FeldhusenJ.F.RuckmanD.R. (1988). A guide to the development of Saturday programs for gifted and talented youths. Gifted Child Today, 11 (5) 56–61.
49.
FollisH.FeldhusenJ. (1983). Design and evaluation of a summer academic leadership program. Rospsr Review, 6 (2) 92–94.
50.
FrasierM.M. (1987). The identification of gifted Black students: Developing new perspectives. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10 (3) 155–180.
51.
FrasierM.M. (1989). Poor and minority students can be gifted, too! Education Leadership, 46 (6) 16–18.
52.
GalvinP. (1986). Sharing among separately organised school districts: Pitfalls and promises. Department of Education, New York State College of Agriculture and Life Sciences at Comell University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 278631)
53.
GuentherZ.C. (1987). Education of the disadvantaged gifted: Recognition, identification and provisions. Gifted International, 4, 70–81.
54.
HamrinJ.M. (1981) Problems in implementing gifted/talented programs in 11 rural Maine schools. University of New England, Biddeford: Maine. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 213538).
55.
HanninenG. E. (1988). A study of teacher training in gifted education. Roeper Review, 10 (3) 139–143.
56.
HarteA.J. (1990). Small secondary schools: Making better use of distant education. Rural Educator, 12, 10–12.
57.
HaydenL.B.GrayM.W. (1990). A successful intervention program for high ability minority students. School Science and Mathematics, 90 (4) 323–333.
58.
HickeyG. (1988). Goals of gifted programs: perceptions of interested groups. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32 (1) 231–233.
59.
HoffmanA.C. (1988). Stimulating interest in science and mathematics. Gifted Child Today, 11 (4) 36–39.
60.
HowleyA. (1989). The progress of gifted students in a rural district: the emphasised acceleration strategies. Roeper Review, 11 (4) 205–207.
61.
HowleyA.A.PendarvisE.D.HowleyC.B. (1988). Gifted programs: Equal access in rural areas. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 8, 3–8.
62.
JohnsonS.T.StamesW.T.GregoryD.BlaylockA. (1985). Program of assessment, diagnosis and instruction (PADI): Identifying and nurturing potentially gifted and talented minority students. Journal of Negro Education, 54 (3) 416–421.
63.
JonesD.G.HendricksonJ.R. (1988–89). Cooperative programs in rural school districts. Rural Educator, 10, 18–20.
64.
JonesE.V.Van ValkenburghN.B. (eds.) (1987). Innovative staff development practices in Northern Virginia schools 1986–1987. George Mason University, Division of Continuing Education. Fairfax: VA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 301 534).
65.
JoyceB.G.WolkingW.D. (1988). Curriculum-based assessment: An alternative approach for screening young gifted children in rural areas. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 8, 9–14.
KarnesF.A.WhortonJ.E. (1991). Teacher certification and endorsement in gifted education: Past, present and future. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35 (3) 148–150.
68.
KamesM.B.JohnsonL.J. (1987). An imperative: Programming for the young gifted/talented. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10 (3) 195–214.
69.
KitanoM. (1986). Evaluating program options for young gifted children. Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 18 (3–4) 89–101.
70.
LandrumM.S. (1987). Guidelines for implementing a guidance/counselling program for gifted and talented children. Roeper Review, 10 (2) 103–107.
71.
LewisG. (1984). Altematives to acceleration for the highly gifted child. Roeper Review, 6 (3) 133–136.
72.
LindsayD.M.AndolekD.BerkeyT. (1988). Gifted kids try college without missing out on high school. Executive Educator, 10 (1) 25.
73.
LuhmanA.FundisR. (1989). Building academically strong gifted programs in rural schools. ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. Char1eston: WV. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 308 066).
74.
LupkowskiA.E. (1984). Gifted students in small rural schools do not have to move to the city. Roeper Review, 7 (1) 13–15.
75.
LynchS.MillsC.J. (1990). The Skills Reinforcement Project (SRP): An academic program for high potential minority youth. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13 (4) 364–379.
76.
McCuneA. (1984). Quality gifted education in small rural schools. Paper presented at the Annual and Rural Small Schools Conference. Manhattan: KS. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 258 743).
77.
McNaghtenS. (1986). QW.IL, A cooperative venture in gifted adolescents. GCT, 9, 12–14.
78.
MeriweatherS.KarnesF.A. (1986). Gifted education in rural areas. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 7, 10–14.
79.
MeyersE. (1984). A study of concerns of classroom teachers regarding a resource room program for the gifted. Roeper Review, 7 (1) 32–36.
80.
MitchellB.M. (1988). A strategy for the identification of the culturally different gifted/talented child. Roeper Review, 10 (3) 163–165.
MoselyV.A.ToddE.W. (1983). Mentorships for Gifted Students. Cleveland Public Schools, Cleveland: OH. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 232 399).
83.
NavarreJ. (1986). Learning and teaching: When to remember and when to forget… they're gifted. Roeper Review, 9 (1) 16–18.
84.
PattonJ.M.PrillmanD.Van Tassel-BaskaJ. (1990). The nature and extent of programs for the disadvantaged gifted in the United States and territories. Gifted Child Today, 34 (3) 94–96.
85.
PaulusP. (1984). Acceleration: More than grade skipping. Roeper Review, 7 (2) 98–100.
86.
PerryP.J.HobackJ.R. (1983). Independent study: The second (or is it the 3rd?) time around. GCT (27) 39–41.
87.
PittsM. (1986). Suggestions for administrators of rural schools about developing a gifted program. Roeper Review, 9 (1) 24–25.
88.
Post-KramerP. (1982). Conceptual level of development as an assessment for identifying gifted students. Exceptional Children, 49 (3) 263–264.
89.
PouwelsJ.B. (1988). Intemational pot-pourri: Foreign language for the gifted and talented in Arkansas. Foreign Language Annals, 21 (2) 147–151.
90.
ReisS.M.RenzulliJ.S. (1988). The role of responsibilities of the gifted program coordinator. Roeper Review, 11 (2) 66–72.
91.
RichertE.S. (1987). Rampant problems and promising practices in the identification of disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 8 (2) 127–132.
92.
RunionsT.SmythE. (1985). Gifted adloescents as co-learners in mentorships, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 8 (2) 127–132.
93.
SawyerR.N.DeLongM.R.von BrockA.B. (1987). By mail learning options for academically talented middle-school youth. Gifted Child Quarterly, 3 (3) 118–120.
StanleyJ.C. (1991). An academic model for educating the mathematically talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35 (1) 36–41.
98.
StrongeJ.H.LynchC.K.SmithC.R. (1987). Educating the culturally disadvantaged, gifted student. The School Counselor, 34 (5) 336–344.
99.
SwicordB. (1988). Maximizing the relationship between self esteem and independent study in an urban gifted program. Roeper Review, 11 (1) 31–32.
100.
TimpsonW.M.JonesC. (1989). The naive expert and the gifted child. Gifted Child Today, 12 (1) 22–23.
101.
ValenciaA.A. (1985). Curricular perspectives for gifted limited English proficient students. NABE: The Journal for the National Association for Bilingual Education, 10 (1) 65–77.
102.
Van Tassel-BaskaJ.WillisG.B.MeyerD. (1989). Evaluation of a full-time self-contained class for gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35 (2) 92–98.
103.
VaughnV.L.FeldhusenJ.F.AsherJ.W. (1991). Meta-Analyses and review of research on pull-out programs in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35 (2) 92–98.
104.
VeirC. (1989). Capitalizing on technological advances to serve rural special education populations. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 9, 7–15.
105.
WillardD.E.RoederA.C. (1986). Through the looking glass: High tech and terrapin. GCT, 9, 30–31.
106.
WintersB. (1989). Mentorships for gifted/creative/talented students. Eastern New Mexico University. Portales: NM. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EO 318209).
107.
YarboroughB.H.JohnsonR.A. (1983). Identifying the gifted: A theory-practice gap. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27 (3) 135–138.
108.
ZomR.L. (1983). A comprehensive program for the gifted/talented pupils in grades 1 through 12. Education, 103 (4) 310–315.
