Disadvantaged gifted presents a challenge to traditional principles of psychology, and entails a general change in orientation. The necessary change must adapt itself to the multi-dimensional definition of intelligence, to utilization of dynamic assessment tests, and to the creation of intervention programs geared to the specific needs of disadvantaged populations. The central premise of the enrichment program for gifted children from disadvantaged areas is that there is central importance in giving them the tools with which to advance and realize their potential. The great gap that exists between their intellectual ability and their academic achievements may be bridged by effective mediated learning. This kind of learning should allow them to acquire the ability to solve problems by systematic thinking and meta-cognition. By this ability the child will become an independent learner, using his thinking skills in real life situations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AusubelD.P. (1968). Educational Psychology, A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
2.
BaldwinA.Y.GearG.H.LucitoL.J. (Eds.). (1978). Educational Planning for the Gifted. Reston, Va.: Council for Exceptional Children.
3.
BaerN.A. (1980). Programs for the gifted: A present or a paradox? Phi Delta Kappan, 61, 621–623.
4.
BelmontJ.M.ButterfieldE.C.FerrettiR.P. (1982). To secure transfer of training instruct self-management skills. In DettermanD.K.SternbergR.J. (Eds.). How and how much can intelligence be increased?Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5.
BrownA.L. (1978). Knowing when, where and how to remember, A problem of metacognition. In GlasserR. (Ed.). Advances in Instructional Psychology, New York: Halsted Press.
6.
BrownA.L.CampioneJ.C.DayJ.D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from text. Educational Research, 10, 14–21.
7.
BrownA.L.CampioneJ.C. (1982). Modifying intelligence or modifying cognitive skills: more than a semantic quibble? In DettermanD.K.SternbergR.J. (Eds.). How and how much can intelligence be increased? Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 215–230.
8.
BrunerJ. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21–32.
9.
BudoffM. (1967). Learning potential among institutionalised young adult retardates. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 72, 404–411.
10.
ButterfieldE.C.BelmontJ.M. (1977). Assessing and improving the executive cognitive functions of mentally retarded people. In:BialerI.SternlichtM.(Eds.). Psychological issues in mental retardation. New York: Psychological Dimensions.
11.
CharlesworthW.R. (1978). Ethology: Its relevance for observational studies of human adaptation. In SackettG.P. (Ed.). Observing Behavior, Vol. 1: Theory and Application in Mental Retardation. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
12.
ClarkB. (1979). Growing up Gifted. Columbus, Ohio. Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
13.
ClendeningC.P.DaviesR.A. (1980). Creating Programs for the Gifted. New York: R.R. Bowker Company.
14.
CrutchfieldR. S. (1969). Nurturing the cognitive skills of productive thinking. In RubinL.I. (Ed.). Life skills in school and society. Washington D.C., Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Pp. 53–71.
15.
EvansJ. (1983). Selective processes in reasoning, In: EvansJ. (Ed.). Thinking and Reasoning, London. Routledge & Kegan, 135–163.
16.
FeuersteinR. (1977). Mediated Learning Experience: A Theoretical Basis for Cognitive Modifiability During Adolescence. In: MittlerP. (Ed.). Research to Practice in Mental Retardation and Training, Volume II. University Park Press, Baltimore.
17.
FeuersteinR.RandY.HoffmanM. (1979). The Dynamic Assessment of Retarded Performance: The Learning Potential Assessment Device, Theory, Instruments, and Techniques. Glenview, IIlinios: Scott, Foresman & Company.
18.
FeuersteinR.RandY.JensenM.KanielS.TzurielD. (1986). Learning Potential Assessment. Journal of Special Services in the Schools.2, 85–106.
19.
FlavellJ.H.WellmanH. (1977). Metamemory. In: KailR.HagenH. (Eds.). Perspectives on the Development of Memory and Cognition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
FoxL.H. (1981). Identification of the academically gifted. American Psychologist, 36, 1103–1111.
GagneR.M. (1977). The Conditions of Learning, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
23.
GardnerH. (1983). Frames of Mind. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
24.
GuildfordJ.P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
25.
HaywoodH.C.FillerJ.W.ShifmanM.A.ChatelanatG. (1975). Behavioral assessment in mental retardation. InMcReynoldsP., (Ed.). Advances in Psychological Assessment, Vol. 3, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers.
26.
JensenA.R. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? In Environment, heredity, and intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
JensenA.R. (1980). Bias in Mental Testing, New York: Free Press.
28.
JensenR.M.FeuersteinR.RandY.KanielS. (1988). Cultural Difference and Cultural Deprivation: A Theoretical Framework for Differential Intervention. In GuptaR.M.CoxheadP. (Eds.). Cultural Diversity and Learning Efficiency. London: MacMillan Press.
29.
KaganJ. (1966). Developmental studies on reflection and analysis. In: KiddARivoireJ. (Eds.). Perceptual and conceptual development in children. New York: International University Press.
30.
KendlerH.H.GlassmanL.D.WardJ.W. (1972). Verbal-Iabeling and cue-training in reversal shift behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 13, 195–209.
31.
KhatenaJ. (1982). Educational Psychology of the Gifted. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
32.
KurtzB.E.BorkowskyJ.g. (1987). Development of strategic skills in impulsive and reflective children: A longitudinal study of metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 129–148.
33.
LawsonM.J. (1980). Metamemory making decisions about strategies. In:KirbyJ.R.BiggsJ.B.(Eds.). Cognition, Development and Instruction. New York: Academic Press.
34.
LearnerK.M.RichmanC.L. (1984). The Effect of Modifying the Cognitive Tempo of Reading-Disabled -Children on Reading Comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 9, 122–134.
35.
LidzC. (1986). Dynamic Assessment: Foundations and Fundamentals. New York: Guilford Publication.
36.
MeichenbaumD. (1974). Self Instructional Training: A cognitive prosthesis for the aged. Human Development, 27, 273–280.
MeichenbaumD. (1986). Metacognitive methods of instruction: current status and future prospects. In:SchwebelM.MaherC.A.(Eds.). Facilitating Cognitive Development. Haworth, New York: 23–31.
39.
MeichenbaumD.AsarnowJ. (1979). Cognitive-Behavior Modification and Metacognition Development. In:KendallP.C.HollonS.D. (Eds.). Cognitive Behavioral Interventions: Theory, Research, and Procedures. N.Y.: Academic Press.
40.
MoynahanE. (1978). Assessment and selection of paired associate strategies: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 26, 257–266.
41.
NewlandT.E. (1976). The Gifted in Socioeducational Perspective. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
42.
PassowA.H. (1972). The Gifted and the Disadvantaged. The National Elementary Principle, 51, 24–31.
RandY.KanielS. (1986). Dynamic Assessment: Theoretical Consideration Group Testing and Educational Implications. In: LidzC. (Ed.). Dynamic Assessment: Foundations and Fundamentals. Guilford Publication, N.Y.: 196–214.
45.
RidingR.J. (1977). School Learning: Mechanisms and Processes. Shepton Mallet, Open Books.
46.
RingelR.A.SpringerC.J. (1980). On knowing how well one is remembering. The persistence of strategy use during transfer. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 29, 322–333.
47.
RogersC. R. (1969). Freedom to Learn. Ohio, Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
48.
SchwebelM. (1986). Facilitating cognitive development: A new educational perspective. In: SchwebelM.MaherC.A. (Eds.). Facilitating Cognitive Development: Haworth, New York: 3–21.
49.
SkuyM.KanielS.TzurielD. (1987). Dynamic Assessment of Intellectually Superior Israeli Children in a Low Socioeconomic Status Community. Gifted Education International, 5, 90–96.
50.
SternbergR.J. (1980). The development of linear syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 340–356.
51.
SternbergR.J. (1981). Cognitive-behavioral approaches to the training of intelligence in the retarded. Journal of Special Education, 15, 165–183.
52.
SternbergR.J. (1982). some common themes in contemporary approaches to the training of intelligent performance. In: DettermanD.K.SternbergjR.J. (Eds.). How and how much can intelligence be increased? Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 141–146.
53.
SternbergR.J. (1985). Instrumental and Componential Approaches to the Nature and Training of Intelligence. In: ChipmanS.F.SegalJ.W.GlaserR. (Eds.). Thinking and Learning Skills. Vol. 2. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 215–243.
54.
SternbergR.J.KetronJ.L.PowellJ.S. (1982). Componential approaches to the training of intelligent performance. In:DettermanD.K.SternbergR.J. (Eds.). How and how much can intelligence be increased?Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 183–205.
55.
SternbergR.J.DavidsonJ.E. (1983). Insight in Gifted. Educational Psychologist, 18, 51–57.
56.
TannenbaumA.J. (1983). Gifted Children, New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
57.
TaylorC.W. (1978). How many types of giftedness can your program tolerate?Journal of Creative Behavior, 12, 39–51.
58.
TorranceE. P. (1962). Guiding Creative Talent. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
59.
TorranceE.P. (1969). Creative positives of disadvantaged children and youth. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 13, 71–81.
60.
VernonP.E.AdamsonG.VernonD.F. (1977). The Psychology and Education of Gifted Children. London: Methuen & Co Ltd.
61.
VygotskyL.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. In: ColeM.John-SteinerV.SchribnerS.SoubermanE. (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
