Special education in the United States services a diverse population, including those students whose academic performance falls at the ends of the normal distribution. This article challenges the assumption that a continuum of learning opportunities appropriate for exceptional persons is possible when the concept of the normal distribution is used. An alternate model, a bull's-eye, is suggested to accommodate the openended potential for the gifted population.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CEC (1987). Packet information. Council for Exceptional Children-National Conference on the Future of Special Education, Orlando, Nov. 15–17.
2.
FoxL.H.WashingtonJ. (1985). Programs for the gifted and talented: Past, present, and future. In HorowitzF.D.O'BrienM. (Eds.). The gifted and talented. Developmental perspectives (pp.197–221). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3.
HuntE. (1976) Varieties of cognitive power. In ResnickL.B. (Ed.). The nature of intelligence, (pp. 237–259), Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
4.
RenzulliJ.S. (1986a). The three ring conception of giftedness: a developmental model for creative productivity (pp. 53–92). In SternbergR.J.DavidsonJ.E. (Eds.). Conceptions of giftedness. NY Cambridge University.
5.
RenzulliJ.S. (Ed.).(1986b). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning.
6.
WebbJ. (1987). Emotional issues of gifted children: Perfectionism, depression, stress and underachievement. Presentation at the 34th Annual Convention of the National Association for Gifted Children, New Orleans, Nov. 9–15.
