This paper suggests adaptations to the Triad to more effectively serve the needs of gifted underachievers, particularly in the affective domain.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ComptonMary F. “The Gifted Underachiever in the Middle School,” Roeper Review. Vol. 4 No. 4April–May 1982. pp. 23–5.
2.
HoffmanJ.L.WassonF.R.ChristiansonB.P. “Personal Development for the Gifted Underachiever,” G/C/T No. 38May–June 1985. pp. 12–14.
3.
MakerC.J.Curriculum Development For the Gifted. Rockville, Maryland. Aspen Systems Corporation. 1982.
4.
MakerC.J.Teaching Models in the Education of the Gifted. Rockville, Maryland. Aspen Systems Corporation. 1982.
5.
RenzulliJoseph. “What Makes a Problem Real: Stalking the Illusive Meaning of Qualitative Differences in Gifted Education.” Gifted Child Quarterly. Vol. 26 No. 4Fall 1982. pp. 147–156.
6.
RenzulliJosephReisSally. “Scope and Sequence Approach to Process Development.” G/C/T No. 37March–April 1985. pp. 3–5.
7.
RenzulliJosephReisSally. The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A Comprehensive Plan for Educational Excellence. Mansfield Center, Connecticut. Creative Learning Press, Inc.1985.
8.
SimonS.HoweL.KirschenbaumH.Values Clarification—A Handbook of Practical Strategies for Teachers and Students. New York. Hart Publishing Company, Inc.1972.
9.
WhitmoreJoanne. Giftedness, Conflict, and Underachievement. Boston. Allyn and Bacon, Inc.1980.
10.
WhitmoreJoanne, “Recognizing and Developing Hidden Giftedness,” The Elementary School Journal. Vol. 82 No. 3Jan. 1982. pp. 274–283.
