The Learning Enrichment Service (LES) and the Mentor Academy Program (MAP) establish a different perspective from which to view the education of the gifted adolescent. LES and MAP place emphasis on the process of learning and focus on the resources required to encourage the transition from teacher directed learning to teacher and student co-directed learning. (The Gifted Learner, 1984). In such a learning partnership, the gifted adolescent is recognized as an equal partner in the initiation, planning, implementation and evaluation of the learning experience. (Runions and Smyth, 1985). This co-learning partnership evolves through the student developing the skills necessary to assume more responsibility for his/her learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArgyrisC.SchonD. (1974). Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectivenes. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
2.
BarnetteJ. J. (1984). “Naturalistic Approaches to Gifted and Talented Program Evaluation.” Journal for the Education of the Gifted. Vol. 7, No. 1.
3.
BogdanR. L.BiklenJ. K. (1982). Qualitative Research for Education. Boston, Allyn & Bacon.
4.
BoydE. M. (1982). Reflection in Experiential Learning. Unpublished. Ph.D. Thesis, Toronto, O.I.S.E.
BuescherT. M. (1984). “Thinking Through the Evaluation Process: An Interview with Joseph Renzulli.” Journal for the Education of the Gifted. Vol. 7, No. 1 pp. 3–11.
7.
ButlerK. (1984). Learning and Teaching Style. Maynard, M.A., Gabriel Systems.
8.
CarneyJ. J. (1976). No Limits to Growth. Winnipeg, Harbeck & Associates.
9.
ChickeringA. W. (1977). Experience and Learning-An Introduction to Experiential Learning. New Rochelle, N.Y., Change Magazine.
10.
ClarkB. (1983). Growing Up Gifted. (Second Edition). Columbus, OH, Charles Merrill.
11.
CliffordJ. A.RunionsT.SmythE. (1984). “The Learning Enrichment Service: A Multi-optional Approach to Programming for Gifted Secondary School Students.” Roeper Review. Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 226–228.
12.
CliffordJ. A.RunionsT.SmythE. (1985). “The Learning Enrichment Service (LES): A Participatory Model for Gifted Adolescents” in RenzulliJ. (ed.) Systems and Models For Developing Programs For the Gifted and Talented. (in press)
13.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and Education. London, Collier MacMillan.
14.
ElkindD. (1984). All Grown Up and No Place to Go. Reading, Mass, Addison-Wesley.
15.
EriksonE. (1968). Identity, Youth and Crisis. New York, Norton.
16.
FergusonM. (1980). The Aquarian Conspiracy. New York, St. Martin's.
17.
FullanM. (1982). The Meaning of Educational Change. Toronto, O.I.S.E.
18.
The Gifted Learner. (Draft, July1984). Ontario, Ministry of Education.
GubaE.G.LincolnY.S. (1981). Effective Evaluation. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.
22.
HencleyS. P.YatesJ. R. (1984). Futurism in Education: Methodologies. Berkely, CA, McCutchan.
23.
HermanR. (1982). The Design of Self-Directed Learning: A Handbook. Toronto, O.I.S.E.
24.
KaplanL. J. (1984). Adolescence: Farewell to Childhood. New York, Simon and Schuster.
25.
KeetonM. T. &Associates. (1976). Experiential Learning. Washington, Jossey-Bass.
26.
KilbD. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.
27.
Learning From Experience. New York: National Commission on Resources for Youth, 1982.
28.
LipnackJ.StampsJ. (1982). Networking: People Connecting with Linking Ideas and Resources. New York, Doubleday/Dolphin.
29.
McClureL.CookS. C.ThompsonV. (1978). Experience-Based Learning: How to Make Your Community Your Classroom. Portland, Oregon, Northwest Regional Educational Library.
30.
MaudsleyD. (1979). A Theory of Meta-Learning and Principles of Facilitation. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Toronto, O.I.S.E.
31.
NashN.CulbertsonJ. (Eds.) (1977). Linking Processes in Educational Improvement. Columbus, Ohio, University Council for Educational Administration.
32.
OSIS. (1984). Ontario Schools: Intermediate/Senior. Ontario, Ministry of Education.
33.
PattonM. Q. (1978). Utilization—Focused Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.
34.
PattonM. Q. (1980). Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.
35.
PattonM. Q. (1981). Creative Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.
36.
PattonM. Q. (1982). Practical Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.
37.
ReisS.RenzulliJ. (1981). “Student Product Assessment Form (SPAF).” In RenzulliJ. (Ed.) Technical Report of Research Related to the Revolving Door Identification Model. Storrs, C. T. Research Report Series, School of Education, University of Connecticut, May.
38.
ReisS. (1983). “Creating Ownership in Gifted and Talented Programs”. Roeper Review. May.
39.
ReisS. (1984). “Avoiding the Testing Trap: Using Alternative Assessment Instruments to Evaluate Programs for the Gifted”. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. Vol. 7, No. 1.
TriffingerD. (1981). Fostering Independent Creative Learning. Williamsville, NY, Centre for Creative Learning.
56.
WestW. G. (1977). “Participant Observation in Canadian Classrooms: The Need, Rationale, Technique and Development Implications.” Canadian Journal of Education. Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 55–74.
