This article focuses on a specific technique for the evaluation of curriculum enrichment programmes. A profile is suggested which enables teachers to examine their philosophy, the quality of resources, teaching strategies and objectives. An extensive bibliography provides an excellent guide to further reading on evaluation and assessment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnoldA. E.BerroA.(1983). Key to more effective programs for gifted/talented — The right evaluation. Roeper Review5 (3), 34–35.
2.
CallahanC. M.(1983). Issues in evaluating programs for the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27 (1),3–7.
3.
BellL. M. (in press) Evaluation of a gifted/enrichment program in Implementing and evaluating changes in classroom practice using innovation profiles. LeithwoodK.MontgomeryD. (Ed.). Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
4.
CallahanC. M.CovertR.AylesworthM.VancoP.(1981). Evaluating a local gifted program: A co-operative effort. Exceptional Children, 48 (2),157–163.
5.
ColangeloN.KellyK.(1983). A study of student, parent and teacher attitudes toward gifted programs and gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27 (3), 103–110.
6.
FullanM.(1980). Research on the implementation of educational change. Paper presented forCorwinR. (Ed.) Research in organizational issues in education. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.
7.
FullanM.(1983). Evaluating program implementation: What can be learned from follow through?Curriculum Inquiry, 13 (2), 215–227.
8.
GilbergS.(1983). Formative evaluation of gifted and talented programs. Roeper Review, 6 (1 ), 43–44.
9.
GuyM.(1978). The Illinois program for gifted children. G/C/T, 1 (5), 53–54.
10.
HallE. G.(1980). Comprehensive evaluation of gifted programs: A matrix method. G/C/T, 15, 12–16.
11.
HallG.LoucksS.(1977). A developmental model for determining whether the treatment is actually implemented. American Educational Research Journal, 14 (13), 263–276.
12.
IretonE. J.KnapikJ.(1982). Follow this step-by-step plan to start a gifted program. The Executive Educator, 4 (4), 31–33.
13.
Kentucky State Department of Education. (1978). Guidelines: Kentucky programs for the gifted/talented. Frankfort, Kentucky: Author, Division of Program Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 175 192.)
14.
KhatenaJ.(1983). What schooling for the gifted?Gifted Child Quarterly, 27 (2), 51–56.
15.
LacyG.(1979). Suggestions for planning and providing programs for the gifted/talented/creative. Albany, N.Y.: New York State Department of Education. (ERIC Reproduction Service No. ED 192 512.)
16.
LaineC.(1983). The implementation of gifted education in British Columbia: A sketch of one province's experience. B.C. Journal of Special Education, 7 (2), 153–161.
17.
LeithwoodK. A.(1979a). Developing a user profile interview schedule. Unpublished manuscript, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Department of Curriculum, Toronto.
18.
LeithwoodK. A.(1979b). Managing the implementation of curriculum innovations. Unpublished manuscript, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Department of Curriculum, Toronto.
19.
LeithwoodK. A.(1979c). The procedures for developing an innovation profile. Unpublished manuscript, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Department of Curriculum, Toronto.
20.
LeithwoodK. A.(1979d). Rating a user profile interview or developing a user profile. Unpublished manuscript, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Department of Curriculum, Toronto.
21.
LeithwoodK. A.(1981). The dimensions of curriculum innovation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13 (1), 25–36.
22.
LeithwoodK. A.(1982). Studies in curriculum decision-making. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
23.
LeithwoodK. A.ClipshamJ. S.MaynesF.BaxterR. P.McNabbJ. D.(1976). Planning curriculum change: A model and case study. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
24.
LeithwoodK. A.MontgomeryD.(1979). Description and evaluation of strategies for implementing selected curriculum policies in The Wellington County Board of Education: A preliminary report. Unpublished manuscript, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto.
25.
LeithwoodK.MontgomeryD.(1980). Evaluating program implementation. Evaluation Review, 4 (2), 193–214.
26.
LeithwoodK.MontgomeryD.(1982). A framework for planned educational change: Application to the assessment of program implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4 (2),157–167.
27.
LeithwoodK.MontgomeryD. (Ed.) (in press). Implementing and evaluating changes in classroom practice using innovation profiles. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
28.
LeithwoodK.MontgomeryD.WilsonR.MarshallA. R.ConnockL.A handbook and practical strategy for evaluating educational programs. Ontario Institute for Studies in Educational and Queen's University.
29.
LittleA. D.(1971). Assessment of present United States Office of Education delivery system to gifted and talented children and youth. Report to the United States Office of Education. Cambridge, Massachussetts: Little (Arthur D.) Inc. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 137 947.)
30.
McCuneA. D.(1980). Planning, implementing and evaluating a program in gifted education in small rural school district. Halstead, Kansas: Halstead Rural High School District 1. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 184 805.)
31.
NascaD.(1983). Evaluating gifted programs: Formative evaluation. Buffalo, N.V.: DOK Publishers.
32.
OglesbyK.GallagherJ. J.(1983). Teacher-pupil ratios, instructional time and expenditure estimates for three administrative strategies for educating gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27 (2), 57–63.
33.
ParkeB. N.BeuscherT. M.(1982). Evaluating programs for the gifted through student self-documentation. Roeper Review, 5 (1), 15–17.
34.
PoppL. A.(1974). Program evaluation: A common sense approach that really works. Niagara Falls, Ontario: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Niagara Centre.
35.
RubenzerR.(1979). Identification and evaluation procedures for gifted and talented programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 23 (2), 304–316.
36.
RyanA. G.(1983). Where are we going with program evaluation?B. C. Journal of Special Education. 7 (1), 41–58.
37.
SchrepferR. C.(1982). Avoiding the pitfalls of gifted programs. NASSP Bulletin, 66 (450), 30–32.
