Although gifted students might be expected to welcome school tests and examinations as a means of attaining positive rewards, it is argued that the characteristics of gifted students such as a preference for self-initiated, independent learning make them particularly vulnerable to negative effects associated with assessment. Features of school assessment which are likely to have a harmful effect upon the gifted student's attitudes and intrinsic motivation are identified and approaches are suggested for improving assessment procedures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CallowR. ‘Recognizing the Gifted Child’, in Educating the Gifted Child, edited by PoveyR. M.. London: Harper and Row, 1980.
2.
CampbellW. J.The Realities of Present Day Learning Environments. Paper presented at a conference, ‘The Future of Europe’ organised by the City of Berlin, 1977.
3.
ClarkB.Growing Up Gifted. Second Edition. Columbus, Ohio: Charles Merrill, 1983.
4.
CodyC. (1983) Learning Styles Including Hemispheric Dominance. A Comparative Study of Average, Gifted and Highly Gifted Students in Grades Five through Twelve. Unpublished doctoral dissertation Temple University. Cited in Dunn, 1984 op cit.
5.
de CharmsR.Personal Causation. New York: Academic Press, 1968.
6.
DunnR. ‘Learning Style: State of the Science’, Theory Into Practice. Winter 1984, 23 (1), 10–19.
7.
DunnR.PriceG. E., ‘The Characteristics of Gifted Students’ Gifted Child Quarterly, 1980, 24 (1), 33–36.
8.
EpsteinS. ‘The Self-Concept Revisited or a Theory of a Theory’, American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 404–416.
9.
FyansL. J.Jr.KremerB. K.SaliliF.MaehrM. L., ‘The Effects of Evaluation Conditions on ‘continuing motivation’: A Study of the Cultural Personalogical, and Situational Antecedents of a Motivational Pattern.’ International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1981, 5, 1–22.
10.
GriggsS. A.PriceG. E., (1979) ‘Comparison Between the Learning Styles of Gifted Students Versus Average Suburban Junior High School Students’ in Student Learning Styles: Diagnosing and Presenting Programs. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals, 63–64, cited in Dunn, 1984, op cit.
11.
HenkW. A. ‘Selective Testing: A Viable Alternative for the Classroom’ Teacher Education, 1981, 17, 11–15.
12.
MaehrM. L. ‘Turning the Fun of School into the Drudgery of Work: The Negative Effects of Certain Grading Practices on Motivation’. Paper presented at a symposium ‘The Effects of Evaluation on Motivation’ at the American Educational Research Association meeting in San Francisco, California, April 21, 1976.
13.
MaehrM. L.StallingsW. M. ‘Freedom from External Evaluation’. Child Development, 1972, 43, 177–185.
14.
NisanM. ‘Motivational Aspects of Evaluation in School’, in Evaluation Roles in Education, edited by LewyA.NevoD.. London: Gordon and Breach, 1981.
15.
PageE. B. ‘Teacher Comments and Student Performance: a Seventy-four Classroom Experiment in School Motivation’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 1958, 49, 173–181.
RowntreeD.Assessing Students: How Shall We Know Them?London: Harper and Row, 1977.
18.
SinclairR. L.GhoryW. J., ‘Connecting Teacher Talents to Student Gifts, in Strategies for Educational Change: Recognizing the Gifts and Talents of all Children. New York: MacMillan, 1981.
19.
StewartE. D. ‘Learning Styles Among Gifted/Talented Students: Instructional Technique Preferences’ Exceptional Children, 1981, 48 (2), 134–138.
20.
TropeY. (1978) cited in NisanM.op. cit.
21.
WallaceB., ‘An Examination of the Development of The Concept of Gifted Education in the United Kingdom: An Analysis of the Current Position with Suggestions for a Positive Way Forward’ Gifted Education International, 1985, 3, 4–11.
22.
WoodliffeH. M.Teaching Gifted Learners: A Handbook for TeachersToronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1977.
