Enhancing Achievement Motivation in Diverse Gifted Underachievers: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the Achievement Motivation Enhancement (AME) Curriculum

Abstract

This mixed-methods study evaluated the Achievement Motivation Enhancement (AME) curriculum’s effectiveness in improving academic motivation, self-regulation, and metacognitive skills among 19 predominantly Black gifted middle school students at risk of underachievement in South Georgia. Using a quasi-experimental delayed treatment design, the study examined changes in academic self-perception, goal valuation, self-regulation, and metacognition. Quantitative findings revealed significant positive effects for academic self-perception (η² = 0.13) and motivation/self-regulation (η² = 0.10), with particularly strong effects in metacognitive evaluation skills (η² = 0.23). Qualitative data from interviews and exit tickets revealed improved positive self-talk, enhanced goal-setting strategies, sustained self-monitoring practices, and clearer goal valuation. Spring implementation showed stronger effects than fall delivery. The AME curriculum shows promise as a targeted intervention for diverse gifted underachievers, with metacognitive strategies demonstrating sustainability beyond the intervention period. Future research should examine long-term effects and optimal implementation factors.

Keywords

underachievement gifted achievement motivation self-regulation intervention metacognition academic self-perception

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barbier

Donche

Verschueren

(2019). Academic (under)achievement of intellectually gifted students in the transition between primary and secondary education: An individual learner perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. Article 2533. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02533

Bates

Mächler

Bolker

Walker

(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Casino-García

A. M.

Llopis-Bueno

M. J.

Llinares-Insa

L. I.

(2021). Emotional intelligence profiles and self-esteem/self-concept: An analysis of relationships in gifted students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1006. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031006

Desmet

(2020). The achievement motivation enhancement model: Evaluating an affective intervention to resolve underachievement (Doctoral thesis. Purdue University). https://doi.org/10.25394/PGS.12383381.v1

Desmet

Crimmins

Seigfried-Spellar

K. C.

Gentry

(2022). AME+Cyber: Evaluating the online delivery of a holistic cyber-related talent development program. Gifted Education International, 38(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211054361

Desmet

O. A.

Cakmakci

Tuzgen

(2023). Evaluating the effectiveness of the online delivery of affective curriculum for gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 46(2), 140–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532231162606

Desmet

O. A.

Pereira

(2022). The achievement motivation enhancement curriculum: Evaluating an affective interven-tion for gifted students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(1), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x211057424

Desmet

O. A.

Pereira

Peterson

J. S.

(2020). Telling a tale: How underachievement develops in gifted girls. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219888633

10.

Ferrer-Wreder

Wänström

Corovic

(2014). Midlife outcomes of educationally underachieving Swedish adolescents with above average Generalized intelligence. Research in Human Development, 11(3), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2014.936172

11.

Ford

D. Y.

Whiting

G. W.

(2011). Beyond testing: Social and psychological considerations in recruiting and retaining gifted Black students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(1), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321003400106

12.

Gagné

(2000). Understanding the complex choreography of talent development through DMGT-based analysis. Elsevier eBooks, 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-008043796-5/50005-x

13.

Gagné

(2018). Academic talent development: Theory and best practices. American Psychological Association eBooks, 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-011

14.

Gentry

Pereira

Peters

S. J.

McIntosh

J. S.

Fugate

C. M.

(2021). HOPE teacher rating scale: Involving teachers in equitable identification of gifted and talented students in K-12: Manual. Routledge.

15.

Hornby

Greaves

(2022). Metacognitive strategies (pp. 95–104). Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96229-6_7

16.

Hughes

Witherspoon

Rivas-Drake

West-Bey

(2009). Received ethnic-racial socialization messages and youths' academic and behavioral outcomes: Examining the mediating role of ethnic identity and self-esteem. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 15(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015509

17.

Infantes-Paniagua

Á.

Fernández-Bustos

J. G.

Ruiz

A. P.

Contreras-Jordán

O. R.

(2022). Differences in self-concept between gifted and non-gifted students: A meta-analysis from 2005 to 2020. Anales de Psicología, 38(2), 278–294.

18.

Jaramillo

J. M.

Rendón

M. I.

Muñoz

Weis

Trommsdorff

(2017). Children’s self-regulation in cultural contexts: The role of parental socialization theories, goals, and practices. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00923

19.

Kalaji

Alborno

(2023). The influence of gifted and talented programs on students’ self-concept. Athens Journal of Education, 10(3), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.10-3-8

20.

Kannis-Dymand

Hughes

Mulgrew

Carter

J. D.

Love

(2020). Examining the roles of metacognitive beliefs and maladaptive aspects of perfectionism in depression and anxiety. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 48(4), 442–453. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465820000144

21.

Kraft

M. A.

(2020). Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x20912798

22.

McCoach

D. B.

(2002). A validation study of the School Attitude Assessment Survey. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 35, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2002.12069050

23.

McCoach

D. B.

Siegle

(2003a). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620304700205

24.

McCoach

D. B.

Siegle

(2003b). The school attitude assessment survey-revised: A new instrument to identify academically able students who underachieve. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(3), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403063003005

25.

Newman

D. A.

(2014). Missing data. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 372–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114548590

26.

Obergriesser

Stoeger

(2015). The influence of emotions and learning preferences on learning strategy use before transition into the high-achiever track in secondary school. High Ability Studies, 27(1), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1100980

27.

Perry

S. P.

Wages

J. E.

3rd Skinner-Dorkenoo

A. L.

Burke

S. E.

Hardeman

R. R.

Phelan

S. M.

(2021). Testing a self-affirmation intervention for improving the psychosocial health of black and white medical students in the US. Journal of Social Issues, 77(3), 769–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12448

28.

Potts

M. L.

(2024). Gifted and Black: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis for Inclusive Gifted Curriculum, Programmatic Options, and Future Research. International Journal of Applied Sciences & Development, 3, 241–269. https://doi.org/10.37394/232029.2024.3.24

29.

Rambo-Hernandez

K. E.

Amin

Wilkerson

Brigandi

(2025). Teacher rating scales continue to be a problematic source of identification: Evidence from ratings of primary students in a rural, low socioeconomic school. Gifted Child Quarterly, 69(3), 298–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862251330254

30.

Raoof

Shokri

Fathabadi

Panaghi

(2024). Unpacking the underachievement of gifted students: A systematic review of internal and external factors. Heliyon, 10(17), Article e36908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36908

31.

Reis

S. M.

Greene

M. J.

(2014). Using self-regulated learning to reverse underachievement in talented students. In Neag center for gifted education and talent development. University of Connecticut.

32.

Reis

S. M.

McCoach

D. B.

(2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400302

33.

Rivas-Drake

Seaton

E. K.

Markstrom

Quintana

Syed

Lee

R. M.

Schwartz

S. J.

Umaña-Taylor

A. J.

French

Yip

Ethnic and Racial Identity in the 21st Century Study Group . (2014). Ethnic and racial identity in adolescence: Implications for psychosocial, academic, and health outcomes. Child Development, 85(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12200

34.

Rozental

(2020). Beyond perfect? A case illustration of working with perfectionism using cognitive behavior therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 76(11), 2041–2054. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23039

35.

Rubenstein

L. D.

Siegle

Reis

S. M.

McCoach

D. B.

Burton

M. G.

(2012). A complex quest: The development and re-search of underachievement interventions for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 678–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21620

36.

Schraw

Dennison

R. S.

(1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

37.

Siegle

McCoach

D. B.

(2005). Making a difference: Motivating gifted students who are not achieving. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990503800104

38.

Siegle

McCoach

D. B.

Roberts

(2017). Why I believe I achieve determines whether I achieve. High Ability Studies, 28(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2017.1302873

39.

Snyder

K. E.

Fong

C. J.

Painter

J. K.

Pittard

C. M.

Barr

S. M.

Patall

E. A.

(2019). Interventions for academically underachieving students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, Article 100294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100294

40.

Snyder

K. E.

Nietfeld

J. L.

Linnenbrink-Garcia

(2011). Giftedness and metacognition. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(3), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986211412769

41.

Stanton

J. D.

Sebesta

A. J.

Dunlosky

(2021). Fostering metacognition to support student learning and performance. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 20(2), fe3. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289

42.

Steenbergen-Hu

Olszewski-Kubilius

Calvert

(2020). The effectiveness of current interventions to reverse the underachievement of gifted students: Findings of a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 132–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220908601

43.

Sternberg

R. J.

Soleimani Dashtaki

(2024). Effectivity: An alternative to conceptions of gifted under- and over-achievement. Gifted Education International, 41(2), 182–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294241280862

44.

Stoeger

Fleischmann

Obergriesser

(2015). Self-regulated learning (SRL) and the gifted learner in primary school: The theoretical basis and empirical findings on a research program dedicated to ensuring that all students learn to regulate their own learning. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9376-7

45.

Stoeger

Ziegler

(2005). Evaluation of an elementary classroom self-regulated learning program for gifted mathematics underachievers. International Education Journal, 6(2), 261–271. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ854979.pdf

46.

Stoeger

Ziegler

(2008). Evaluation of a classroom-based training to improve self-regulation in time management tasks during homework activities with fourth graders. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9027-z

47.

Thames

A. D.

Hinkin

C. H.

Byrd

D. A.

Bilder

R. M.

Duff

K. J.

Mindt

M. R.

Arentoft

Streiff

(2013). Effects of stereotype threat, perceived discrimination, and examiner race on neuropsychological performance: Simple as black and white? Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS, 19(5), 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617713000076

48.

Tibken

Richter

Von Der Linden

Schmiedeler

Schneider

(2022). The role of metacognitive competences in the development of school achievement among gifted adolescents. Child Development, 93(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13640

49.

Wigfield

Eccles

J. S.

Fredricks

J. A.

Simpkins

Roeser

R. W.

Schiefele

(2015). Development of achievement motivation and engagement. In Lamb

M. E.

Lerner

R. M.

(Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Socioemotional processes (7th ed., pp. 657–700). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy316