Gender differences in highly creative individuals need to be investigated. In two samples of Brazilian people with high levels of creativity, gender differences were investigated. First, 335 adults responded to a set of figural and verbal tests. A total of 64 individuals were identified using +1SD above the mean (30 women, 34 men) and 19 using +2SD (9 women, 10 men). A second sample of 711 adults was tested for their figural creativity. 96 participants had +1 SD above the mean (69 women, 27 men) and 24 had +2 SD above the mean (17 women, 7 men). There were no significant gender differences in total creativity scores between the groups in both samples for the two-creativity level based on the Mann-Whitney test. According to these findings, educators must encourage women to express their creativity to achieve in all careers to combat gender bias.
AbrahamA. (2016). Gender and creativity: An overview of psychological and neuroscientific literature. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 10(2), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-015-9410-8
2.
AcarS.LeeL. E.SchererR. (2024). A reliability generalization of the Torrance tests of creative thinking-figural. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 40(5), 396–411. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000819
3.
AlabbasiA. M. A.ThompsonT. L.RuncoM. A.AlansariL. A.AyoubA. E. A. (2025). Gender differences in creative potential: A meta-analysis of mean differences and variability. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 19(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000506
4.
BaerJ. (1999). Gender differences. In RuncoM. A.PritzkerS. R. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 753–758). Academic Press.
BesançonM.LubartT.BarbotB. (2013). Creative giftedness and educational opportunities. Educational and Child Psychology, 30(2), 79–88. https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/3tsjxt5
7.
BetancourtJ.ValadezM. D.Rodríguez-NaveirasE.FloresJ. F.BorgesÁ. (2022). Differences between creativity and gender in students with high abilities attending a school with total grouping. Children, 9(7), 1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9071081
8.
BisandaB. W.MingW. (2019). Assessing factors accelerating gender inequality in Tanzania education system: Mien of imperative government policy for development. Public Policy and Administration Research, 9(5), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.7176/PPAR
9.
BonettiA.AbreuM. A. (2011). Faces da desigualdade de gênero e raça no Brasil [Faces of inequality of gender and race in Brazil]: Instituto de Pesquisas Econômicas Aplicadas-IPEA.
10.
CallahanC. M.HébertT. P. (2020). Gender issues. In PluckerJ.CallahanC. (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 267–280). Routledge.
11.
ChenX.ChengL. (2023). Emotional intelligence and creative self-efficacy among gifted children: Mediating effect of self-esteem and moderating effect of gender. Journal of Intelligence, 11(17), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11010017
12.
EislerR.MontuoriA. (2007). Creativity, society, and the hidden subtext of gender: Toward a new contextualized approach. World Futures, 63(7), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604020701572681
13.
FalkA.HermleJ. (2018). Relationship of gender differences in preferences to economic development and gender equality. Science, 362(6412), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aas9899
14.
FariasE.WechslerS. (2024). Mulheres brasileiras criativas: Contribuições marcantes do mundo feminino [Brazilian creative women: Outstanding contributions from the female world]. Vetor Editora/ Giunti Psychometrics.
15.
FeldhusenJ. F. (2005). Giftedness, talent, expertise, and creative achievement. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 64–79). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455.006
16.
FleithD. S.AlencarE. M. L. S. (2012). Autoconceito e Clima Criativo em Sala de Aula na percepção de alunos do ensino fundamental [Self-concept and Creative Environment in the classroom according to elementary school students]. Psico-USF, 17(2), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-82712012000200003
17.
FreemanJ.Garces-BacsalR. M. (2016). Gender differences in gifted children. In NeihartM.ReisS. M.TobinsonN. M.MoonS. M. (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 15–27). Routledge.
18.
GagnéF. (2005). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 98–120). Cambridge University Press.
19.
GindiS.Kohan-MassJ.PilpelA. (2019). Gender differences in competition among gifted students: The role of single-sex versus Co-Ed classrooms. Roeper Review, 41(3), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1622163
20.
GlăveanuV. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five a's framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029528
21.
HeiseL.GreeneM. E.OpperN.StavropoulouM.HarperC.NascimentoM.ZewdieD.Gender Equality, Norms, and Health Steering Committee (2019). Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: Framing the challenges to health. Lancet,393(10189), 2440-2454. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30652-X
22.
HoraS.LemoineG. J.XuN.ShalleyC. E. (2021). Unlocking and closing the gender gap in creative performance: A multilevel model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(3), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2500
23.
IsabiryeA. K.MoloiK. C.LebeloR. S.KhanS. (2025). Cultivating creativity and innovation in the school curriculum for the 21st century: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(3), 334–348. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i3.6647
24.
KaufmanJ. C. (2006). Self-reported differences in creativity by ethnicity and gender. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(8), 1065–1082. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1255
25.
KaufmanJ. C.BeghettoR. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four-c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
26.
KaufmanJ. C.KaufmanS. B.BeghettoR. A.BurgessS. A.PerssonR. S. (2009). Creative giftedness: Beginnings, developments, and future promises. In ShavininaL. V. (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 585–598). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_28
27.
KimJ.MichaelW. B. (1995). The relationship of creativity measures to school achievement and to preferred learning and thinking style in a sample of Korean high school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055001006
28.
KimJ.VaulontM. J.ZhangZ.ByronK. (2024). Looking inside the Black box of gender differences in creativity: A dual-process model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(12), 1861–1900. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001205
Maia-PintoR.FleithD. (2002). Percepçao de professores sobre alunos superdotados [Teachers’perceptions of gifted students]. Estudos de Psicologia, 19(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-166X2002000100007
31.
MassudaM. B.OrlandoR. M. (2019). Altas habilidades/superdotação na perspectiva de gênero: um estudo de revisão sistemática. Revista Educação Especial, 32, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5902/1984686X26398
32.
MatudM. P.RodriguesC.GrandeJ. (2007). Gender differences in creative thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 1137–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.006
33.
MatudM. P.RodríguezC.GrandeJ. (2007). Gender differences in creative thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 1137–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.006
34.
McIntoshD. E.DixonF. A.PiersonE. E. (2018). Use of intelligence tests in the identification of giftedness. In FlanaganD. P.McDonoughE. M. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 587–607). The Guilford Press.
35.
MendonçaP. V. C. F.FleithD. S. (2005). Relação entre criatividade, inteligência e autoconceito em alunos monolingues e bilíngües [Relationship between creativity, intelligence, and selfconcept in monolingual and bilingual students].Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 9(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-85572005000100006.
36.
MilianQ.WechslerS. M. (2018). Avaliação integrada da inteligência e criatividade [Integrated assessment of intelligence and creativity]. Revista de Psicologia, 36(2), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201802.005
37.
NakanoT. C. (2025). Teste de Criatividade Figural versão adolescentes e adultos.Vetor.
38.
NakanoT. C.BritoM. E. (2013). Avaliação da Criatividade a partir do controle do nível de inteligência em uma amostra de crianças. Temas em Psicologia, 21(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.9788/tp2013.1-01
39.
NakanoT. C.OliveiraK. S.ZaiaP. (2021). Gender Differences in Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review.Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 37(e372116). https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e372116
NeumannP. (2019). Desigualdade de gênero e altas habilidades/superdotação [Gender inequality and high abilities/giftedness]. Diversidade e Educação, 6(2), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.14295/de.v6i2.8396
42.
NogueiraD. de S.PrietoR. G. (2021). Educação Especial: perspectivas do entrelaçamento entre altas habilidades/superdotação e gênero [Special Education: perspectives of interlacing between high abilities/giftedness and gender]. Revista Diálogos E Perspectivas Em Educação Especial, 8(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.36311/2358-8845.2021.v8n2.p117-132
Organization for Economic and Cooperation Development. (2024). PISA 2022 results (volume III): Creative minds, creative schools. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/765ee8c2-en
45.
PérezS. G. P. B.FreitasS. N. (2013). A mulher com altas habilidades/superdotação: à procura de uma identidade [Women with exceptional abilities/giftedness: in search of identity]. Revista Brasileira de Educação Especial, 18(4), 677–694.
46.
PettersenJ. (2013). Gender differences in identification of gifted youth and in gifted program participation: A meta-analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.07.002
47.
PfeifferS. I.WechslerS. M. (2013). Youth leadership: A proposal for identifying and developing creativity and giftedness. Estudos de Psicologia, 30(2), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-166X2013000200008
48.
PluckerJ. A.BeghettoR. A.DowG. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
49.
PreckelF.VockM.Olszweski-Kubilius. (2024). Giftedness and talent: What educators and psychologists need to know. Hogrefe. https://doi.org/10.1027/00627-000
50.
ReisA. P. P. Z.GomesC. A. (2011). Práticas pedagógicas reprodutoras de desigualdades: a sub-representação de meninas entre alunos superdotados [Pedagogical practices that reproduce inequalities: underrepresentation of girls in gifted programs]. Estudos Feministas, 19(2), 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-026X2011000200013
51.
RenzulliJ. S. (2005). The three-ring definition of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 246–280). Cambridge University Press.
RodriguesC. J. S.AlencarE. M. L. S. (1983). Um estudo do pensamento criativo em alunos do 1° grau [Study of creative thinking in elementar school students]. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, 35(1), 113–122. https://periodicos.fgv.br/abp/article/view/18890/17636
55.
Ruiz-del-PinoB.Fernández-MartínF. D.Arco-TiradoJ. L. (2022). Creativity training programs in primary education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, Article 101172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101172
56.
RuncoM. A.CramondB.PagnaniA. R. (2010). Gender and creativity. In ChrislerJ.McCrearyD. (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 343–357). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_17
RuncoS.PritzkeS. R. (2020). Encyclopedia of creativity (3rd ed.). Elsevier.
59.
SaadA.ElbashirA.AbdouR.AlkhairS.AliR.ParangusanH.AhmadZ.Al-ThaniN. (2024). Exploring of the gender variations in 4Cs skills among primary students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52(4), Article 101510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101510
60.
SakU. (2004). About creativity, giftedness, and teaching the creatively gifted in the classroom. Roeper Review, 26(4), 216–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190409554272
61.
SilvaG. T.WechslerS. M.MartinsC. C.VaniP. (2022). Gênero e autopercepção das habilidades intelectuais e criativas [Gender and self-perception of intelectual and creative skills]. Revista Iberoamericana de Criatividade e Inovação, 3. https://recriai.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/74
62.
SilvaG. T.WechslerS. M.MartinsC. C.VaniP. (2022). Gênero e autopercepção das habilidades intelectuais e criativas [Gender and self-perception of intelectual and creative skills].Revista Iberoamericana de Criatividade e Inovação, 3(1).
63.
SoutoK.CastroH.DelouC. M. C. (2021). Da formação básica à prática docente: qual a percepção do professor sobre a superdotação? [From basic education to teachers' practice: what is the teachers' perception about giftedness?]. Travessia, 15(2), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.48075/rt.v15i2.26215
64.
SternbergR. J. (2018). Creative giftedness is not just what creativity tests test: Implications of a triangular theory of creativity for understanding creative giftedness. Roeper Review, 40(3), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1467248
65.
StreiechenE. M.Krause-LemkeC.CruzG. C. (2020). Análise do percurso escolar de um estudante com altas habilidades em um contexto familiar multilíngue: um estudo de caso. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 25, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782020250057
66.
TaylorC. L.Said-MetwalyS.CamardaA.BarbotB. (2024). Gender differences and variability in creative ability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the greater Male variability hypothesis in creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 126(6), 1161–1179. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000484
67.
Thornhill-MillerB.CamardaA.MercierM.BurkhardtJ.-M.MorisseauT.Bourgeois-BougrineS.VinchonF.El HayekS.Augereau-LandasM.MoureyF.FeybesseC.SundquistD.LubartT. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
68.
TorranceE. P. (1990). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Scholastic Testing Service.
69.
VillanovaA. L. I.Pina e CunhaM. (2020). Everyday creativity: A systematic literature review. Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(3), 673–695. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.481
70.
VirgolimA. M. R.AlencarE. M. L. S. (1993). Habilidades de pensamento criativo entre alunos de escolas abertas, intermediárias e tradicionais [Creative thinking abilities among students from open, intermediate, and traditional schools]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 9(3), 601–610. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/lil-143622
71.
WechslerS. M. (2004). Pensando criativamente com figuras de Torrance – versão brasileira [Thinking Creatively with Pictures from Torrance – Brazilian version]. Laboratório de Avaliação e Medidas Psicológicas.
72.
WechslerS. M. (2006). Validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking to the Brazilian Culture.Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_3
73.
WechslerS. M.NakanoT. C.DominguesS. F. S.RosaH. R.SilvaR. B. F.Silva-FilhoJ. H.MinervinoC. A. S. M. (2014). Gender differences on tests of crystallized intelligence. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 7(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.30552/ejep.v7i1.98
74.
WechslerS. M.SuarezJ. T. (2016). La percepción de maestros en cursos de formación sobre talentos/superdotación. Revista de Psicología, 34(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201601.002
75.
XuX.ChenY.YeX.ZhangJ.LuanY.LiY. (2025). Creativity: Exploring factor structure of the Torrance tests of creative thinking in Chinese preschoolers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 59(3), Article e1529. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.1529
