The effects of an affective intervention to resolve a gifted, Black seventh grade girl’s academic underachievement were investigated. The 12-year-old participant received the intervention 1 hour a week for six weeks. An explanatory mixed methods design, combining a single-case A-B design, an interrupted time series simulation, and inductive analysis of qualitative data, was used to examine how the intervention affected changes in the student’s achievement, achievement motivation, behavioral engagement in class, and attitudes toward school and teachers. Results showed a significant increase in behavioral engagement (d = 1.22, p < .001) and achievement during and after the intervention (SMD = 1.28). Academic self-concept (MD = 0.57) and attitudes toward school (MD = 1.00) improved, but attitudes toward teachers showed no change. Although goal valuation (MD = −0.67) and self-regulation (MD = −0.40) decreased, the student demonstrated increased awareness of self-regulation and goal setting strategies.
AndersonB. N. (2020). “See me, see us”: Understanding the intersections and continued marginalization of adolescent gifted Black girls in U.S. classrooms. Gifted Child Today, 43(2), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217519898216
2.
AndrewsD. J. C. (2012). Black achievers’ experiences with racial spotlighting and ignoring in a predominantly white high school. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 114(10), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811211401002
3.
Archer-BanksD. A.Behar-HorensteinL. S. (2012). Ogbu revisited: Unpacking high-achieving African American girls’ high school experiences. Urban Education, 47(1), 198–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085911427739
4.
BanduraA. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
5.
BarlowD. H.NockM. K.HersenM. (2009). Single case experimental designs. Pearson.
6.
BerryR.ThunderK. (2013). The Promise of Qualitative Metasynthesis: Mathematics Experiences of Black Learners. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.7916/jmetc.v3i2.757
7.
BlaasS. (2014). The relationship between social-emotional difficulties and underachievement of gifted students. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 24(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2014.1
8.
BristolT. J.Martin-FernandezJ. (2019). The added value of Latinx and Black teachers for Latinx and black students: Implications for policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(2), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732219862573
9.
Butler-BarnesS. T.VarnerF.WilliamsA.SellersR. (2017). Academic identity: A longitudinal investigation of African American adolescents’ academic persistence. Journal of Black Psychology, 43(7), 714–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798416683170
10.
ByrneB. M.ShavelsonR. J. (1986). On the structure of adolescent self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(6), 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.6.474
11.
CastoA. R.CrabtreeL. (2020). Hidden in plain sight: Life lessons taught by gifted Black girls to their White STEM teachers. In JosephN. M. (Ed.), Understanding the intersections of race, gender, and gifted education: An Anthology by and about talented Black girls and women in STEM (pp. 71–83). Information Age Publishing.
12.
CherngH.-Y. S.HalpinP. F. (2016). The importance of minority teachers: Student perceptions of minority versus White teachers. Educational Researcher, 45(7), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16671718
13.
CollinsP. H. (2017). Black feminist thought in the matrix of domination. In LemertC. (Ed.), Social theory of multicultural, global, and classic readings (pp. 421–424). Westview Press.
14.
CreamerE. (2018). An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
15.
CresswellJ. W.Plano-ClarkV. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
16.
DavisB. K. (2021). Influences on academic talent development of black girls in K-12: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Academics, 32(4), 435–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X211013806
17.
DavisM.StadulisR.Neal-BarnettA. (2018). Assessing the effects of the acting White accusation among Black girls: Social anxiety and bullying victimization. Journal of the National Medical Association, 110(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2017.06.016
18.
DentA. L.KoenkaA. C. (2016). The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 425–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9320-8
19.
DesmetO. A.PereiraN.PetersonJ. S. (2020). Telling a tale: How underachievement develops in gifted girls. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219888633
20.
EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA. (2023). Expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: Reflections on the legacy of 40+ years of working together. Motivation Science, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000275
21.
EmerickL. (1992). Academic underachievement among the gifted: Students’ perception of factors that reverse the pattern. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(3), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629203600304
22.
ErtlB.LuttenbergerS.PaechterM. (2017). The impact of gender stereotypes on the self-concept of female students in STEM subjects with an underrepresentation of females. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 703. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00703
23.
Evans-WintersV. E. (2014). Are black girls not gifted? Race, gender, and resilience. Interdisciplinary Journal of Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 22–30.
24.
Evans-WintersV. E.EspositoJ. (2010). Other People's Daughters: Critical Race Feminism and Black Girls' Education. Educational Foundations, 24, 11-24.
25.
FordD. Y. (1995). A study of achievement and underachievement among gifted, potentially gifted, and average African-American students. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
26.
FordD. Y. (2014). Segregation and the underrepresentation of Blacks and Hispanics in gifted education: Social inequality and deficit paradigms. Roeper Review, 36(3), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2014.919563
27.
FordD. Y.HarrisB. N.ByrdJ. A.WaltersN. M. (2018). Blacked out and whited out: The double bind of gifted Black females who are often a footnote in educational discourse. International Journal of Educational Reform, 27(3), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678791802700302
28.
FordD. Y.MooreJ.ScottM. (2011). Key theories and frameworks for improving the recruitment and retention of African American students in gifted education. The Journal of Negro Education, 80(3), 239–253. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41341131
29.
FordhamS. (1988). Racelessness as a factor in Black students’ school success: Pragmatic strategy or pyrrhic victory?Harvard educational review, 58(1), 54–85. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.58.1.c5r77323145r7831
30.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP.FriedelJ.ParisA. (2005). School engagement. In MooreK. A.LippmanL. H. (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? The search institute series on developmentally attentive community and society (3, pp. 305–321). Springer.
31.
GershensonS.HartC. M. D.HymanJ.LindsayC. A.PapageorgeN. W. (2022). The long-run impacts of same-race teachers. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 14(4), 300–342. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20190573
32.
GrahamA.AndersonK. A. (2008). “I have to be three steps ahead”: Academically gifted African American male students in an urban high school on the tension between an ethnic and academic identity. The Urban Review, 40(5), 472–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-008-0088-8
33.
GrahamS.TaylorA. Z. (2002). Ethnicity, gender, and the development of achievement values. In Development of achievement motivation (pp. 121–146). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50007-3
34.
GrahamS.TaylorA.HudleyC. (2014). A Motivational Intervention for African American Boys Labeled as Aggressive. Urban Education, 50(2), 194-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085914549364(Original work published 2015)
35.
GrahamJ. R.WestL. M.MartinezJ.RoemerL. (2016). The mediating role of internalized racism in the relationship between racist experiences and anxiety symptoms in a Black American sample. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22(3), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000073
36.
GranthamT. C. (2012). Eminence-Focused Gifted Education: Concerns About Forward Movement Void of an Equity Vision. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(4), 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212456074
37.
GrobmanJ. (2006). Underachievement in exceptionally gifted adolescents and young adults: A psychiatrist’s view. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(4), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2006-408
38.
HarmonD. A.FordD. Y. (2013). The experiences of gifted African American females: “Damned if you are and damned if you aren’t.”. In Zamani-GallaherE. M.PoliteV. C. (Eds.), African American females: Addressing challenges and nurturing the future (pp. 45–76). Michigan State University Press. https://doi.org/10.14321/jj.5501059.7
39.
HarperF. K.AndersonB. N. (2020). “I just get all stressed out”: Coping with perfectionism as a Black-gifted girl in mathematics. In JosephN. M. (Ed.), Understanding the intersections of race, gender, and gifted education: An Anthology by and about talented Black girls and women in STEM (pp. 27–52). Information Age Publishing.
JenE. (2017). Affective Interventions for High-Ability Students From 1984-2015: A Review of Published Studies. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28(3), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X17715305
42.
JohnsonI. R.PietriE. S.FulliloveF.MowrerS. (2019). Exploring identity-safety cues and Allyship among Black women students in STEM environments. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319830926
43.
Khezir azarH.LavasaniM. G.MalahmadiE.AmaniJ. (2010). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning approaches and mathematics achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 942–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.214
44.
KoenderinkT.HovingaF. (2018). Gifted dropouts: How this Dutch program helps struggling students get back on track. Parenting for High Potential, 7, 12–20.
LaeversF.PeetersA.VanwijnsbergheP. (1994). De Leuvense betrokkenheidsschaal voor leerlingen. CEGO. [Leuven Engagementscale for students].
47.
LiemA. D.LauS.NieY. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 486–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001
48.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 1(2), 133–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00010.x
49.
MartellaR. C.NelsonJ. R.MorganR. L.Marchand-MartellaN. E. (2013). Understanding and interpreting educational research. Guildford Press.
McCoachD. B.SiegleD. (2003). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620304700205
52.
MofieldE.Parker PetersM. (2019). Understanding underachievement: Mindset, perfectionism, and achievement attitudes among gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(2), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353219836737
53.
MorrisM. W. (2016). Pushout: The Criminalization of Black Girls in Schools. The New Press.
54.
MuhammadG. E. (2012). Creating spaces for Black adolescent girls to “write it out!”: Exploring identity, literacy, and academic achievement within writing club (Doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Chicago.
55.
MuhammadG. E.HaddixM. (2016). Centering Black girls’ literacies: A review of literature on the multiple ways of knowing of Black girls. English Education, 48(4), 299–336. https://doi.org/10.58680/ee201628670
56.
NasirN. S.SaxeG. B. (2003). Ethnic and Academic Identities: A Cultural Practice Perspective on Emerging Tensions and Their Management in the Lives of Minority Students. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 14-18. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032005014
57.
NeihartM.ReisS.RobinsonN. M.MoonS. M. (2002). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?Prufrock Press.
58.
ObergriesserS.StoegerH. (2015). The role of emotions, motivation, and learning behavior in underachievement and results of an intervention. High Ability Studies, 26(1), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1043003
PetersonJ. S.ColangeloN. (1996). Gifted achievers and underachievers: A comparison of patterns found in school files. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74(4), 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1996.tb01886.x
61.
PetersonJ. S.JenE. (2018). The Peterson proactive developmental attention model: A framework for nurturing the rest of the whole gifted child. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(2), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353218763874
62.
PreckelF.BrunnerM. (2015). Academic self-concept, achievement goals, and achievement: Is their relation the same for academic achievers and underachievers?Gifted and Talented International, 30(1-2), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2015.1137458
63.
PreckelF.HollingH.VockM. (2006). Academic underachievement: Relationship with cognitive motivation, achievement motivation and conscientiousness. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20154
64.
ReisS. M.McCoachD. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go?Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400302
65.
RidgleyL. M.DaVia RubensteinL.CallanG. L. (2020). Gifted underachievement within a self‐regulated learning framework: Proposing a task‐dependent model to guide early identification and intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 57(9), 1365–1384. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22408
66.
RubanL.ReisS. M. (2006). Patterns of self‐regulatory strategy use among low‐achieving and high‐achieving university students. Roeper Review, 28(3), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190609554354
67.
RubensteinL. D.SiegleD.ReisS. M.McCoachD. B.BurtonM. G. (2012). A complex quest: The development and research of underachievement interventions for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 678–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21620
68.
SaldañaJ. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.
69.
SchnitzlerK.HolzbergerD.SeidelT. (2020). All better than being disengaged: Student engagement patterns and their relations to academic self-concept and achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00500-6
70.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (1998). Summarizing Single-Subject Research: Issues and Applications. Behavior Modification, 22(3), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455980223001
71.
SeatonM.ParkerP.MarshH. W.CravenR. G.YeungA. S. (2014). The reciprocal relations between self-concept, motivation and achievement: Juxtaposing academic self-concept and achievement goal orientations for mathematics success. Educational Psychology, 34(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.825232
72.
SiegleD. (2013). The underachieving gifted child: Recognizing, understanding, and reversing underachievement. Prufrock Press.
SnyderK. E.FongC. J.PainterJ. K.PittardC. M.BarrS. M.PatallE. A. (2019). Interventions for academically underachieving students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100294
75.
SnyderK. E.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (2013). A developmental, person-centered approach to exploring multiple motivational pathways in gifted underachievement. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.835597
76.
SteeleC. M.AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
77.
Steenbergen-HuS.Olszewski-KubiliusP.CalvertE. (2020). The effectiveness of current interventions to reverse the underachievement of gifted students: Findings of a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 132–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220908601
78.
StoegerH.SteinbackJ.ObergriesserS.MatthesB. (2014). What is more important for fourth-grade primary school students for transforming their potential into achievement: The individual or the environmental box in multidimensional conceptions of giftedness?High Ability Studies, 24(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2014.914381
TarlowK. R.BrossartD. F. (2018). A comprehensive method of single-case data analysis: Interrupted Time-Series Simulation (ITSSIM). School Psychology Quarterly: The Official Journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association, 33(4), 590–603. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000273
81.
TeyeA. C.PeasleeL. (2015). Measuring educational outcomes for at-risk children and youth: Issues with the validity of self-reported data. Child and Youth Care Forum, 44(6), 853–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-015-9310-5
82.
ThomasD. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
U.S. Department of Education. (2020). The state of racial diversity in the educator workforce. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development.
85.
WebbB. J.LawrenceS. C. (2024). Can we talk for a minute? Understanding asset-based mechanisms for academic achievement from the voices of high-achieving black students. The Urban Review, 56(4), 566–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-024-00690-z
86.
WhitingG. W. (2006). From at risk to at promise: Developing scholar identities among Black males. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(4), 222–229. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2006-407
87.
WhitmoreJ. R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Allyn & Bacon.
88.
YoungJ. L.YoungJ. R.CapraroM. M. (2017). Black girls’ achievement in middle grades mathematics: How can socializing agents help?The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 90(3), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2016.1270657
89.
YoungJ. L.YoungJ. R.FordD. Y. (2017). Standing in the gaps: Examining the effects of early gifted education on Black Girl achievement in STEM. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28(4), 290–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X17730549
90.
ZimmermanB. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1–19). Guilford Publications.
91.
ZimmermanB. J.BanduraA. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 845–862. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031004845
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
