Catalysts and Deterrents for STEAM Talent Development of Students from Economically-Disadvantaged Families Through Specialized STEAM Talent Residential High Schools

Abstract

Talent developmental experiences of economically disadvantaged students of Specialized STEM Talent Residential High Schools (SSTRHS) were investigated. Nine students who were preferentially admitted to SSTRHS due to their families’ economic disadvantage were interviewed twice on their experiences from early childhood to college. The data were verified by checking with survey data, national gifted education data and interviews with master teachers. A thematic analysis revealed that STEM talent was recognized early by parents and acknowledged through competitions. However, there were limited resources and opportunities for them to study advanced mathematics systematically and intensely until they entered SSTRHS. At the SSTRHS, they struggled with an extremely accelerated math curriculum. However, with support from advanced peers and teachers, they could cope with their weaknesses caused by limited dosage of STEM learning. Experience conducting research with peers and mentors were the most critical catalysts for their planning for future careers as research scientists.

Keywords

economically disadvantaged STEAM talent development Specialized STEM Talent Residential High Schools

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Almarode

J. T.

Subotnik

R. F.

Crowe

Tai

R. H.

Lee

G. M.

Nowlin

(2014). Specialized high schools and talent search programs: Incubators for adolescents with high ability in STEM disciplines. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x14536566

Ambrose

(2005) Aspiration growth, talent development, and self‐fulfillment in a context of democratic erosion. Roeper Review 28: 11–19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190509554332

Bloom

B. S.

(1985). Developing talent in young people. Ballantine.

Borland

J. H.

Wright

(1994). Identifying young, potentially gifted, economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(4), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629403800402

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Briggs

C. J.

Renzulli

J. S.

(2009). Scaffolding CLED students to promote greater participation in programs for the gifted and talented. Journal of Urban Education: Focus on Enrichment, 6(1), 1–15.

Bryman

(2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.

Campbell

J. R.

and Walberg, H. J. (2010) Olympiad studies: Competitions provide alternatives to developing talents that serve national interests. Roeper Review, 33(1): 8–17.

Cho

Campbell

(2010). Differential influences of family processes for scientifically talented individuals’ academic achievement along developmental stages. Roeper Review, 33(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.530205

10.

Cho

Park

(2011). Ionic liquid-assisted direct synthesis of PdO nanoparticles immobilized on boehmite nanoparticles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 357(1), 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.084

11.

Choi

Paik

(2017). The effects of private tutoring on elementary school students' academic achievement. The Korean Society for the Economics and Finance of Education, 26(3), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.46967/jefe.2017.26.3.25

12.

Finn

C. E.

Jr. Northern

A. M.

(2018). Narrowing the gifted gap for disadvantaged students. NAGC. https://www.nagc.org/blog/narrowing-gifted-gap-disadvantaged-students

13.

Gagné

(2005). From gifts to talents. Conceptions of Giftedness, 2, 98–119.

14.

Gottfried

A. E.

and Gottfried, A. W. (1996) A longitudinal study of academic intrinsic motivation of intellectually gifted children: Childhood through early adolescence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4): 179–183.

15.

Joffe

(2012a). Thematic analysis. Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy, 1, 210–223.

16.

Joffe

(2012b). Thematic analysis. In Harper

Thompson

A. R.

(Eds), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners (pp. 209–223). Wiley-Blackwell. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/26140328/Thematic_Analysis

17.

Korean Statistical Information Service (2021, November 11). Private tutoring expenditure. https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=711&tblId=DT_711005_21_A03&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=214A_711_71105_003_001&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&language=kor&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=MT_ZTITLE

18.

Lamb

K. N.

Boedeker

Kettler

(2019). Inequities of enrollment in gifted education: A statewide application of the 20% equity allowance formula. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(4), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219830768

19.

Lee

Lim

(2009). An analysis of the effect of private tutoring expenditure on middle school students' achievement. The Journal of Economics and Finance of Education, 18(1), 141–166.

20.

Lee

S. D.

Lee

K. S.

(2015). A comparative study on gifted programs abroad for economically disadvantaged or minority students: The cases of US, UK, Germany, Australia, and Israel. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 25(3), 439–463. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2015.25.3.439

21.

National Science Gifted Information Service (2022). August 10). Statistics of science gifted institutions and students. http://www.nsgi.kr/statistics/condition?reportSeq=1020

22.

Nokelainen

Tirri

Campbell

J. R.

Walberg

(2007). Factors that contribute to or hinder academic productivity: Comparing two groups of most and least successful Olympians. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(6), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610701785931

23.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Clarenbach

(2012). Unlocking emergent talent: Supporting high achievement of low-income, high-ability students. National Association for Gifted Children. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/95163

24.

Park

Lee

(2009). Effect of middle school students’ plan to enter special-purposed high school on their demand for private tutoring. Asian Journal of Education, 10(3), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2009.10.3.010

25.

Park

Kim

NamGung

Paik

Yang

Kim

(2017). Comprehensive analysis on education gap. Technical Report. Korean Educational Development Institute.

26.

Park

K. H.

Seo

H. A.

(2005). Perception of students and teachers on the curriculum and educational programs at national specialized residential science high schools. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(3), 159–185.

27.

Park

S. K.

(2005). Students’ perception of instructional activities at the national specialized residential science high schools and categories of their interactions in science classes. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 26(1), 30–40.

28.

Plucker

Hardesty

Burroughs

(2013). Talent on the sidelines: Excellence gaps and America’s persistent talent underclass. Storrs: University of Connecticut, Center for Education Policy Analysis.

29.

Plucker

J. A.

Peters

S. J.

(2016). Excellence gaps in education: Expanding opportunities for talented students. Harvard Education Press.

30.

Russell

Gregory

Ploeg

DiCenso

Guyatt

(2005). Qualitative research. In DiCenso

Guyatt

Ciliska

(Eds), Evidence-based nursing: A guide to clinical practice (pp. 120–136). Elsevier Mosby.

31.

Siegle

Gubbins

E. J.

O’Rourke

Langley

S. D.

Mun

R. U.

Luria

S. R.

Little

McCoach

D.B.

Knupp

Callahan

Plucker

J. A.

(2016). Barriers to underserved students’ participation in gifted programs and possible solutions. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39(2), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216640930

32.

Strauss

(1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.

33.

Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Worrell

F. C.

(2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056

34.

Thomas

Williams

(2009). The history of specialized STEM schools and the formation and role of the NCSSSMST. Roeper Review, 32(1), 17–24.https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190903386561

35.

Tomlinson

C. A.

Jarvis

J. M.

(2014). Case studies of success: Supporting academic success for students with high potential from ethnic minority and economically disadvantaged backgrounds. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(3), 191–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214540826

36.

Wyner

J. S.

Bridgeland

J. M.

DiIulio

J. J.

Jr (2007). Achievement trap: How America is failing millions of high-achieving students from lower-income families. A Report by the Jack Kent Cooke Foundation & Civic Enterprises.

37.

Yang

Campbell

J. R.

Cho

(2021) Recognition, expectation, and differentiation for mathematical talent development of young gifted English learners. In: Kuusisto

Ubani

Nokelainen

Toom

(eds). Good teachers for tomorrow’s schools-Purpose, values and talents in education. Boston: Brill-Sense, 217–239.

38.

Ziegler

Heller

K. A.

(2000). Conceptions of giftedness from a meta-theoretical perspective. International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent, 2, 3–21.