The study analyses the relationship between transdisciplinary integration, creativity and student motivation in three STEAM projects. It has been carried out over 3 years in a programme for gifted students. 152 students (11–12 years old), five teachers and four external professionals participated. The projects included a variety of scientific, humanistic and artistic activities, together with outings, the collaboration of experts and the creation of a transdisciplinary art-based final products. The research was carried out through the analysis of qualitative data (interviews, video-recordings, participant observation) using Atlas.ti8 within the framework of Activity Theory and statistical analysis of questionnaires. It shows how the transdisciplinary integration favoured a complex approach to knowledge with an essential role of the artistic-based transdisciplinary final products and fostered a plural approach to creativity. The active participation of the students favoured their motivation and involvement. The significant correlation between creativity, student motivation and transdisciplinary integration emerges as a key element in the STEAM projects implemented.
AkhanN. E.ÇiçekS.KocaağaG. (2022) Critical and creative perspectives of gifted students on global problems: Global climate change. Thinking Skills and Creativity46: 101131. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2022.101131.
BurnardP.Colucci-GrayL. (2020). Why science and art creativities matter. (Re- configuring STEAM for future-making education). Brill/Sense Publishers.
5.
BurnardP.Colucci-GrayL.CookeC. (2022). Transdisciplinarity: Re-visioning how sciences and arts together can enact democratizing creative educational experiences. Review of Research in Education, 46(1), 166–197. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X221084323
6.
BybeeR. W. (2006). Scientific inquiry and science teaching. In FlickL. B.LedermanN. G. (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (Vol. 25, pp. 1–14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5814-1_1
7.
ChalmersC.CarterM. L.CooperT.NasonR. (2017). Implementing “big ideas” to advance the teaching and learning of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(S1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9799-1
8.
ChoS.LinC. Y. (2010). Influence of family processes, motivation, and beliefs about intelligence on creative problem solving of scientifically talented individuals. Roeper Review, 33(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.530206
9.
Colucci-GrayL.BurnardP.CookeC.DaviesR.GrayD.TrowsdaleJ. (2017). Reviewing the potential and challenges of developing STEAM education through creative pedagogies for 21st century learning: How can school curricula be broadened towards a more responsive, dynamic and inclusive form of education?BERA.
10.
ConradtyC.BognerF. X. (2019). From STEM to STEAM: Cracking the code? How creativity & motivation interacts with inquiry-based learning. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641678
11.
CostantinoT. (2018). STEAM by another name: Transdisciplinary practice in art and design education. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1292973
12.
DeHaanR. L. (2009). Teaching creativity and inventive problem solving in science. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 8(3), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-12-0081
13.
De la GarzaA.TravisC. (Eds.), (2018). The STEAM revolution: Transdisciplinary approaches to science, technology, engineering, arts, humanities and mathematics. Springer.
14.
DiekerL.GrilloK.RamlakhanN. (2012). The use of virtual and simulated teaching and learning environments: Inviting gifted students into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers (STEM) through summer partnerships. Gifted Education International, 28(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429411427647
15.
EngeströmY. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In EngestromY.MiettinenR.PunamakiR. L. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge University Press.
16.
Escobar PérezJ.Cuervo MartínezA. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: Una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición, 6(1), 27–36.
GlaveanuV. P.BeghettoR. A. (2021). Creative experience: A non-standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 33(2), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1827606
19.
GuyotteK. W.SochackaN. W.CostantinoT. E.WaltherJ.KellamN. N. (2014). Steam as social practice: Cultivating creativity in transdisciplinary spaces. Art Education, 67(6), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2014.11519293
JeffreyB.CraftA. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: Distinctions and relationships. Educational Studies, 30(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569032000159750
23.
KelleyT. R.KnowlesJ. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
24.
Lage-GómezC.RosG. (2021). Transdisciplinary integration and its implementation in primary education through two STEAM projects (La integración transdisciplinar y su aplicación en Educación Primaria a través de dos proyectos STEAM). Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 44(4), 801–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2021.1925474
25.
LevyP. (2017). Research design: Quantitative. Qualitative. Mixed methods. Arts- based. And community-based participatory research approaches. The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12276
26.
LiaoC. (2016). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEAM education. Art Education, 69(6), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224873
27.
LittleC. A.FengA. X.VanTassel-BaskaJ.RogersK. B.AveryL. D. (2007). A study of curriculum effectiveness in social studies. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(3), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207302722
28.
LoewenthalK. M.LewisC. A. (2018). An introduction to psychological tests and scales. Psychology Press.
29.
PerignatE.Katz-BuonincontroJ. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31(2), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002
30.
QuigleyC. F.HerroD.JamilF. M. (2017). Developing a conceptual model of STEAM teaching practices. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12201
31.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/
32.
RenzulliJ. S. (1999). What is this thing called giftedness, and how do we developed it? A twenty – five year perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329902300102
33.
Root-BernsteinR. (2015). Arts and crafts as adjuncts to STEM education to foster creativity in gifted and talented students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9362-0
34.
SaldenR. J. C. M.PaasF.Van MerriënboerJ. J. G. (2006). A comparison of approaches to learning task selection in the training of complex cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(3), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.06.003
SternbergR. (2020). The augmented theory of successful intelligence. In SternbergR. (Ed.), The cambridge Handbook of intelligence (cambridge handbooks in psychology) (pp. 679–708). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108770422.029
37.
TuckerB.HafensteinN. L.JonesS.BernickR.HainesK. (1997). An integrated-thematic curriculum for gifted learners. Roeper Review, 19(4), 196–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199709553828
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
