Abstract
Spirituality is an important domain in the holistic education of gifted students. The definition of transformational giftedness makes it possible to emphasize spiritual domain in student development. Spirituality provides possibilities to reflect on the values and meanings of life that could provide purpose for gifted students in their studies and for their future lives. The concepts of religion and spirituality are defined, and their different roles clarified in the context of education. Spiritual sensitivity is introduced as a human capacity that can be measured scientifically with the spiritual sensitivity questionnaire instrument. Research findings among young generation and gifted students indicate that mystery-sensing, contemplation, and search for meaning in life are important aspects in spirituality of our generation.
Keywords
In this topical discussion, I will discuss the term ‘spirituality’ in the context of Gardner’s multiple intelligences theory (Gardner, 1983, 1999) and Sternberg’s concept of transformational giftedness (Sternberg, 2020a, 2020b). I will review theoretical and empirical research on these topics and argue that spirituality is an important domain in the holistic education of gifted students. I will use the findings from empirical studies to provide evidence of the importance of spirituality in gifted students’ lives. Spirituality and giftedness are both terms that can be understood in multiple ways and in educational contexts and teacher education we need to clarity these terms to avoid misconceptions. In this paper I will use the recent definition by Sternberg to define giftedness with transformational nature as “exceptional ability or talent that can enable or has enabled an individual to make one or more extraordinary and meaningful contributions that help to make the world a better place” (Sternberg, 2020a, p. 205). In this definition giftedness include developmental and domain-specific quality that can be educated. Transformational nature of giftedness makes it possible to emphasize social, moral and spiritual aspects in giftedness. The wider spectrum in definition also provides teachers wider perspectives to identify gifted students.
The aspiration to contribute to making the world a better place, the beyond-the-self orientation, is similar in Sternberg’s definition of transformational giftedness than in the definition of purpose presented by Damon. He defines purpose in life as follows: “Purpose is a stable intention to accomplish something that is both meaningful to the self and of consequence beyond the self over time” (Damon, 2008; Damon et al., 2003, p. 212). Our recent studies among Finnish secondary school students (
It is important to clarify the different meanings given to the concepts of religion and spirituality. In the classical definition by William James (1902, p. 32) he defined religion as “the feelings, acts and experiences of individual men in their solitude”. Today, the terms ‘religion’ and ‘spirituality’ are often applied interchangeably to add linguistic variety to the terminology. However, many researchers define spirituality in contrast to religion (Heelas & Woodhead, 2005; Ubani & Tirri, 2006). These definitions usually define religion as the organizational, the ritual, and the ideological. The spiritual then refers to the personal, the affective, the experiential, and the thoughtful. The idea that an individual can be spiritual without being religious or religious without being spiritual, has become a standard part of many papers on spirituality (Pargament, 1999). Clearly then, spirituality ought to be seen as a wider concept than religion. Such an understanding of these concepts indicates that religion and spirituality not only share some common areas but also have their own areas of interests (Stifoss-Hanssen, 1999).
Spiritual intelligence has been suggested as a new intelligence type that includes skills to reflect on the meaning in life and create values in new circumstances (Zohar & Marshall, 2000). Gardner has discussed three possible domains of spiritual intelligence. First, he attributes the “concern with cosmic or existential issues” to the sphere of spiritual intelligence. In fact, Gardner (1999, 60) has considered whether it would be more appropriate to consider spiritual intelligence as a form of existential intelligence. Second, he emphasizes the “spiritual as achievement of a state of being” which represents the psychological states and phenomenal experiences that are called spiritual. The third domain is “spiritual as it affects others”, a social aspect, which also coincides with the term charisma and is an important ingredient of bringing other people towards fulfillment of the first two domains in their lives. Spiritual intelligence and its measurability are a widely debated topic (Emmons, 2000; Gardner, 2000; Mayer, 2000) and in their instrument development Tirri and Nokelainen (2011) have used the term ‘spiritual sensitivity’ to be able to better measure this phenomenon. In their work they have used David Hay’s (1998) research on spirituality to conceptualize spiritual sensitivity. Hay has identified three categories of spiritual sensitivity.
Tirri’s studies with young Finnish adults confirm other empirical studies in which more and more people call themselves spiritual rather than religious (Heelas & Woodhead, 2005; Mikkola et al., 2007). British researchers Heelas and Woodhead argue that people do so because they are reluctant to commit themselves to hierarchies and would rather grow and develop as their own unique selves rather than going to churches and submitting themselves to their teaching. The Swedish researcher Alden (2006) has analyzed the current religiosity as highly individualistic, experiential, non-authoritarian and non-dogmatic. In Finland, preadolescents also perceived the concept of spirituality as more connected to these qualities than the concept of religion (Ubani & Tirri, 2006). Today religion cannot be poured over the people from outside as habits or rituals. It is something to be experienced within the person. Traditional religion is bound to tradition and institutions, whereas spirituality is contemplation of the self, inner existentialism, and concentration on experiences. Compared to previous generations the new generations are trying to more actively search for meaning and are making sense of life themselves without ready answers given by the church. Spirituality refers now to what was referred to earlier as religion in the broadest and non-traditional sense (Mikkola et al., 2007).
Tirri (2008) has explored spiritual sensitivity among Finnish young adults (
Studies among Finnish theology students also indicate that the community-sensing dimension of spirituality is related to a spiritual calling and a helping orientation (Hirsto & Tirri, 2009; Tirri & Kuusisto, 2019). On the other hand, the spiritual calling of Finnish theology students was related to the value-sensing dimension of spirituality. Some of the community-sensing items in the spirituality sensitivity scale are operationalized in a way that clearly refers to spiritual community, and according to Hirsto and Tirri (2009) it is not surprising that a spiritual calling and community-sensing are related. However, it seems that the former is seen from a somewhat more communal perspective among these students. This sheds light on the thoughts behind studying theology: Hirsto and Tirri (2009) assume that students who have a spiritual calling gladly see themselves working as priests or other active participants in spiritual communities. This interpretation is in alignment with the findings of Lips-Wiersma (2002), who demonstrated that spirituality may inspire “unity with others” (Hirsto & Tirri, 2009; Tirri & Kuusisto, 2019).
Tirri et al. (2006) have discussed the possibility that the concepts of spiritual intelligence and spiritual sensitivity could be synonyms. In their study they found that academically gifted students rated their spiritual sensitivity higher than average ability students. With this observation they asked whether gifted students have spiritual intelligence (Tirri et al., 2007) In their book, Tirri and Nokelainen (2011) explored the concepts of spiritual intelligence and spiritual sensitivity and developed an instrument to measure spiritual sensitivity (SSQ).
In empirical studies among gifted Tirri (2005) and Ubani (2010) identified their strength in the mystery-sensing dimension of spirituality. Mystery sensing is connected to our capacity to transcend everyday experience and to use our imagination. Gifted preadolescents looked for mystery and wanted to use their imagination in addition to logical and scientific thinking practiced in schools. In the studies by (Tirri & Ubani, 2005) and Ubani (2007) with gifted pre-adolescents, spirituality was very much concerned with the meaning of life. According to academically gifted students they needed help and mentoring in their decisions on who they want to become and what they would like to do in the future with their studies and life in general.
In a recent study among Finnish upper-secondary students gifted students in physics rated their multiple intelligences with the MIPQ-instrument developed by Tirri and Nokelainen (2011). The instrument included spiritual and environmental sensitivities (Makkonen et al., 2022). In this study upper-secondary students rated environmental sensitivity and spiritual sensitivity very high. The highest rating in environmental sensitivity may indicate transformational giftedness that reflect concerns related to climate change we all should be worried about. In Finland the national core curriculum strongly emphasizes environmental awareness and global responsibility, and sustainability issues are in the core of all subjects studied (FNAE, 2019). The high rating of spiritual sensitivity focused on curiosity about everyday life and appreciation of quiet moments. We also found an association between sensitivity to nature and the spiritual dimension that could be explained with personal values both domains emphasize. According to authors, the students’ high scores for self-evaluated spiritual and environmental sensitivity have implications to physics teaching (Makkonen et al., 2022). The emphases on curiosity and imagination related to everyday phenomena that spirituality includes with contemplation may benefit the learning of gifted students in all the subjects taught at school.
In this discussion I have argued that spirituality is an important domain in gifted education to educate the whole person of the student. Transformational giftedness includes a goal to make a world a better place with one’s gifts and talents. The goal of education is to help the gifted students to find a purpose in life that would be meaningful to themselves and contribute beyond-the-self at the same time. Empirical studies among purposeful youth indicate that religion and spirituality can provide grounds in the search for communities where young people can manifest their values and callings. I have reflected the different meanings people give to religion and spirituality and shown that spirituality provides wider possibilities in education than religiosity to reflect on the personal meaning of life including values, personal commitments, and career choices. I have presented empirical research findings on the importance of spirituality for the young generation and gifted students with their desire to contemplate and look for mystery in life in addition to scientific knowledge. In the global transition with environmental crises, we need spirituality to decern what are our values and priorities that would give us personal purpose in life and to make our world a better place for the next generations.
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
