Effects of mathematical modelling based project production and management program on gifted students’ mathematical modelling and reflective thinking for real-life problem solving

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the relationship between mathematical modelling and reflective thinking and to examine the effects of employing mathematical modelling processes on perception of mathematical modelling competencies and reflective thinking skills for real-life problem solving of gifted students participating in Project Production and Management Program at Turkish Science and Art Centers. Correlational path analysis of 300 students data revealed that Mathematical modelling is a significant predictor of reflective thinking skills, and the constructed model was found to be of a good fit with excellent path coefficients. Experimental design with pre-post-maintenance-tests with comparison group was employed with 60 students purposefully selected chosen from the above regression study. Reflective thinking and mathematical modelling levels of experimental group students who employed mathematical modelling processes for Project Production and Management increased significantly more from pre- to post-tests, and the significant difference was found to be maintained.

Keywords

Gifted and talented students mathematically gifted mathematical modelling reflective thinking math project production project production program

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahn

Cho

(2021) Science creative productivity of science high school graduates: Its predictive relationship with family processes, classroom quality, intelligence, science attitudes, and academic achievement. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education 30(3): 447–471. Available at: https://doi.org/10.9722/jgte.2021.31.3.447.

Altıntaş

Özdemir

A. S.

(2015) The effect of developed differentiation approach on the achievements of the students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 2015(61): 199–216. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.61.11.

Biccard

Wessels

D. C. J.

(2011) Documenting the development of modelling competencies of Grade 7 mathematics students. In: Kaiser

Blum

Borromeo Ferri

Stillman

(eds). Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling. New York: Springer, 375–383.

Bishop

(2000). The research processes of gifted students: A case study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400106

Blomhøj

Højgaard Jensen

(2003) Developing mathematical modelling competence: conceptual clarification and educational planning. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications 22(3): 123–139. doi: 10.1093/teamat/22.3.123.

Bloom

B. S.

(1976) Human characteristics and school learning. McGraw-Hill.

Blum

(1993) Mathematical modelling in mathematics education and instruction. In: Breiteig

Huntley

Kaiser

(eds). Teaching and learning mathematics in context. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood, 3–14.

Blum

(1996) Anwendungsbezüge im Mathematik-unterricht—Trends und Perspektiven. In: Kadunz

et al. (ed) Trends und Perspektiven. Schriftenreihe Didaktik der Mathematik. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, 23, 15–38.

Blum

(2011) Can modelling be taught and learnt? Some answers from empirical research. In: Kaiser

Blum

Borromeo Ferri

Stillman

(eds). Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling. New York: Springer, 15–30.

10.

Blum

Niss

(1991) Applied Mathematical Problem Solving, Modelling, Applications, and Links to Other Subjects. State, Trends and Issues in Mathematics Instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics 22: 37–68. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302716.

11.

Bolton

Delderfield

(2018). Reflective practice: Writing and professional development. SAGE.

12.

Borromeo Ferri

(2006). Theoretical and empirical differentiations of phases in the modelling process. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik-ZDM, 38(2), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02655883

13.

Boyd

E. M.

Fales

A. W.

(1983). Reflective learning: Key to learning from experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23(2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167883232011

14.

Brookfield

S. D.

(2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. John Wiley & Sons.

15.

Brown

T. A.

(2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford.

16.

Byrne

B. M.

(1994). Structural equation modelling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Sage.

17.

Callahan

C. M.

Moon

T. R.

Azano

A. P.

Hailey

E. P.

(2015). What works in gifted education: Documenting the effects of an integrated curricular/instructional model for gifted students. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 137–167. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214549448

18.

Cho

(2003). Creative problem solving in science: Divergent, convergent, or both? In Anuruthwong

Hiranburana

Piboonchol

(Eds), Igniting children potentials and creativity. Proceedings of the 7th Asia-pacific conference on giftedness. Bangkok, August 12-16, 2002 (169-174). October Printing.

19.

Cho

(2007). Nurturing creative problem-solving ability of the gifted in Confucian society. The Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 17(2), 392–411.

20.

Cho

Yang

Mandracchia

(2015). Effects of M³ curriculum on mathematics and English proficiency achievement of mathematically promising English language learners. Journal of Advanced Academics, 26(2), 112–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X15577205

21.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical Power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrance Earlbaum Associates.

22.

Çokluk

Ö.

Şekercioğlu

Büyüköztürk

Ş.

(2010) Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve lisrel uygulamaları [Multivariate statistics for social sciences: SPSS and lisrel applications] . Pegem.

23.

Deringöl

Davaslıgil

Ü.

(2020). The effect of differentiated mathematics programs on the mathematics attitude of gifted children. MOJES, 8(1), 27–37.

24.

Dewey

(1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. D.C. Heath and Company.

25.

Erbaş

A. K.

Kertil

Çetinkaya

Çakıroğlu

Alacacı

Baş

(2014) Mathematical modeling in mathematics education: Basic concepts and different approaches. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 14(4): 1–21. doi: 10.12738/estp.2014.4.2039.

26.

Gavin

M.K.

Casa

T. M.

Adelson

J. L.

Carroll

S.R.

Sheffield

L. J.

Spinelli

A. M.

(2007). Project M³: Mentoring mathematical minds-a research-based curriculum for talented elementary students. Journal of Advance Academic, 18(4), 566–584. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2007-552

27.

Gözeten

İ.

(2017). Bilim ve sanat merkezlerinde öğrenim gören öğrencilerin problem çözmeye yönelik yansıtıcı düşünme becerileri[Reflective thinking skills for problem solving of gifted students at science and art centers] [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Pamukkale University.

28.

Güneş

Aybek

(2018) Analysing the science and art students’ reflective thinking skills aimed at solving problem attitudes to mathematics lesson. International Social Sciences Studies Journal 4(24): 5031–5042. Available at: https://doi.org/10.26449/sssj.968.

29.

Haines

C.R.

Crouch

R. M.

(2007). Mathematical modelling and applications: Ability and competence frameworks. In Blum

Galbraith

P. L.

Henn

H. W.

Niss

(Eds), Modelling and applications in mathematics education (pp. 417–424). Springer.

30.

Hendriana

Dwi Putra

Hidayat

(2019). How to design teaching materials to ımprove the ability of mathematical reflective thinking of senior high school students in Indonesia? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12), em1790. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/112033

31.

Hidayat

Zulnaidi

Syed Zamri

SNA

(2018). Roles of metacognition and achievement goals in mathematical modelling competency: A structural equation modelling analysis. Plos One, 13(11), e0206211. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206211

32.

Hooper

Coughlan

Mullen

M. R.

(2008) Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 6(1): 53–60. Available at: https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejbrm/article/view/1224/1187.

33.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

34.

Johns

(Ed), (2017). Becoming a reflective practitioner. John Wiley & Sons.

35.

Kaiser

(2020). Mathematical modelling and applications in education. In Lerman

(Ed), Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_101

36.

Kaiser

Grünewald

(2015) Promotion of mathematical modelling competencies in the context of modelling projects. In: Lee

N. H.

Dawn

N. K. E.

(eds). Mathematical Modelling from Theory to Practice. London: World Scientific Publishing, 21–39.

37.

Kim

Cho

Ahn

Jeong

Choi

Kang

Kim

(2021). Core competencies and corresponding curriculum needed for the future STEM talented students at the specialized national-level residential science high schools. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 31(4), 477–498. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2021.31.4.477(KCI

38.

Kim

M. K.

Roh

I. S.

Cho

M. K.

(2016) Creativity of gifted students in an integrated math science instruction. Thinking Skills and Creativity 19: 38–48. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.07.004.

39.

Kızılkaya

Aşkar

(2009). The development of a reflective thinking skill scale towards problem solving. Education and Science, 34(154), 82–92. http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/550

40.

Kline

R. B.

(2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. Routledge.

41.

Kolb

D. A.

(2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.

42.

Lia

(2020). Simplify your study: Effective strategies for coursework and exams. Macmillan Study Skills)Red Globe Press.

43.

Little

C. A.

Adelson

J. L.

Kearney

K. L.

Cash

O’Brien

(2018). Early opportunities to strengthen academic readiness: Effects of summer learning on mathematics achievement. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738052

44.

Maaß

(2006) What are modelling competencies? Zentralblatt für Didaktik der. Mathematik-ZDM 38(2): 113–142. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655885.

45.

Manuel

Freiman

(2017). Differentiating instruction using a virtual environment: A study of mathematical problem posing among gifted and talented learners. Global Education Review, 4(1), 78–98.

46.

Mezirow

(2006). An overview of transformative learning. In Sutherland

Crowther

(Eds), Lifelong learning: Concepts and contexts (pp. 24–38). Routledge.

47.

Ministry of National Education (MONE) (2019) Bilim ve sanat merkezleri yönergesi [Science and Art Centers Directive]. MONE. Available at: http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/html/bilimsanat/yonerge.pdf.

48.

Özbek

Dağyar

(2022) Examining gifted students’ evaluations of their education programs in terms of their project production and management. Frontiers in Psychology 13: 833395. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.833395.

49.

Özbek

Köse

(2019). Reflective thinking skills of pre-service teachers and factors that enhance the reflective thinking. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(2), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2577

50.

Özbek

Köse

(2022). Determination of psychometric characteristics of mathematical modeling competencies scale: gifted and talented youth. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education. Advance Online Publication. Available at https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.874247

51.

Özçelik

(2018). Üstün yetenekli öğrencilere yönelik geliştirilen farklılaştırılmış matematik dersi öğretim programinin etkililiği [Efficiency of differentiated mathematics curriculum designed for gifted and talented students] [Unpublished PhD thesis]. Hacettepe University.

52.

Özdamar

(2004) Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi [Statistical data analysis with package programs]. EskişehirKaan.

53.

Özdemir

Gürlen

(2019) Üstün yetenekli öğrencilere yönelik zenginleştirilmiş fen bilimleri öğretim programına ilişkin eylem araştırması. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2019(49): 231–255. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.480399.

54.

Özyaprak

Davaslıgil

Ü.

(2015) The effectiveness of a math differentiation program for gifted students on math attitude. Journal of Gifted Education Research 2015(3): 26–47.

55.

Pierce

R. L.

Cassady

J. C.

Adams

C. M.

Neumeister

K. L. S.

Dixon

F. A.

Cross

T. L.

(2011). The effects of clustering and curriculum on the development of gifted learners’ math achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(4), 569–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321103400403

56.

Reis

S. M.

Renzulli

J. S.

(1991). The assessment of creative products in programs for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(3), 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629103500304

57.

Rodgers

(2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842–866. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810210400402

58.

Saygılı

Atahan

(2014) Analyzing Reflective Thinking Skills towards Problem Solving of Gifted Children in Terms of Various Variables. Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences 2014(31): 181–192.

59.

Schön

D. A.

(19831987). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Educating the reflective practitioner. Basic BooksPearson Education, Inc.

60.

Sengil-Akar

Yetkin-Ozdemir

I. E.

(2022) Investigation of mathematical collective creativity of gifted middle school students during model-eliciting activities: the case of the quilt problem. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 53(2): 337–363. doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2020.1768311.

61.

Sternberg

(1988). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. In Sternberg

(Ed), Three-facet model of creativity (pp. 125–147). Cambridge University Press.

62.

Sümer

(2000) Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar [Structural Equation Modeling: Basic Concepts and Applications]. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 3(6): 49–74.

63.

Tabachnickve Fidell

B. G. L. S.

(2001). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.

64.

Tekin Dede

(2017) Examination of the relationship between modelling competencies and class level and mathematics achievement. Elementary Education Online 16(3): 1201–1219. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2017.330251http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr/index.php/io/article/view/2454.

65.

Thahir

KomarudinHasanah

U.N.

Rahmahwaty

(2019) MURDER learning and self efficacy models: Impact on mathematical reflective thingking ability. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 7(4): 1123–1135. Available at: http://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.594709.

66.

Urban

(2003). Towards componential model of creativity. Hampton Press.

67.

H.-G.

Yun

J.-G.

(2017). Development and application of program for mathematically gifted students based on mathematical modeling: Focused on voronoi diagram and delaunay triangulation. Communications of Mathematical Education, 31(3), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2017.31.3.257

68.

Zedan

Bitar

(2017) Mathematically gifted students: Their characteristics and unique needs. European Journal of Education Studies 3(4): 236–260. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.375954.