Remote learning through a mobile application in gifted education

Abstract

During the school closure in the COVID-19 pandemic, students with special needs including gifted students faced many challenges in terms of educational support. The Turkish Ministry of National Education released a mobile app named “I am special, I am in education” to overcome these challenges. This study aimed to explore how gifted children perceived the experience of learning through this mobile app. Using a phenomenological design, the data were collected from 10 gifted students through focus group interviews and student journals. An inductive approach was used to analyze the data. The findings indicated that although gifted students referred to this experience as weird and different, they also stated that using the app helped their learning. They foregrounded that the app needed improvements and a section for live interaction with other gifted students and teachers to increase their motivation. This study suggests some implications for mobile app developers, educators, and parents.

Keywords

COVID-19 gifted mobile app online learning school closure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aboud

(2021). Challenges to gifted education in the Covid-19 pandemic about online learning in Saudi Arabia from the perspective of gifted students and parents. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 8(1), 11–21. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jgedc/issue/58718/845995.

Adler

Salantera

Zumstein-Shaha

(2019) Focus group interviews in child, youth, and parent research: An integrative literature review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18: 1–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919887274.

Boettcher

J.V.

Conrad

R. M.

(2016). The online teaching survival guide: Simple and practical pedagogical tips. Josey-Bass.

Chen

Yun Dai

Zhou

(2013). Enable, enhance, and transform: How technology use can improve gifted education. Roeper Review, 35(3), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2013.794892.

Creswell

J. W.

Miller

D. L.

(2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2.

Creswell

J. W.

Poth

C. N.

(2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.

Daniel

S. J.

(2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49(1–2), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3.

Desmet

Crimmins

Seigfried-Spellar

K. C.

Gentry

(2021). AME+ Cyber: Evaluating the online delivery of a holistic cyber-related talent development program. Gifted Education International. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211054361.

Edmunds

W. J.

(2020). Finding a path to reopen schools during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 4(11), 796–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30249- 2.

10.

Erdem

(2021). Problems, transformations, application examples and detections for gifted students in the Polish education system in the Covid-19 process. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 9(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.864104.

11.

French

L. R.

Walker

C. L.

Shore

B. M.

(2011). Do gifted students really prefer to work alone? Roeper Review, 33(3), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.580497.

12.

Garbe

Ogurlu

Logan

Cook

(2020). COVID-19 and Remote learning: Experiences of parents with children during the pandemic. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 4(3), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/8471.

13.

Given

L. M.

(Ed.), (2008). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. SAGE.

14.

Heary

Hennesy

(2006). Focus groups versus individual interviews with children: A comparison of data. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 27(1–2), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.2006.10446228.

15.

Hopcan

Tokel

T. S.

(2021) Exploring the effectiveness of a mobile writing application for supporting handwriting acquisition of students with dysgraphia. Education and Information Technologies 26: 3967–4002. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10440-3.

16.

Hung

P. H.

Hwang

G. J.

I. H.

Lin

I. H.

(2012). A concept-map integrated dynamic assessment system for improving ecology observation competences in mobile learning activities. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 10–19.

17.

Ishii

Gilbride

D. D.

Stensrud

(2009). Students’ internal reactions to a one-week cultural immersion trip: A qualitative analysis of student journals. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 37(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1912.2009.tb00088.x.

18.

Ismaili

Ibrahimi

E. H. O.

(2017). Mobile learning as alternative to assistive technology devices for special needs students. Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 883–899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9462-9.

19.

Jen

Gentry

Moon

S. M.

(2017). High-ability students’ perspectives on affective curriculum in a diverse, university-based summer residential enrichment program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(4), 328–342.https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217722839.

20.

Khaddage

Müller

Flintoff

(2016). Advancing mobile learning in formal and informal settings via mobile app technology: Where to from here, and how? Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 16–26.

21.

Kronborg

Foley-Nicpon

(2020). GTI editorial. Gifted and Talented International, 35(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2020.1802173.

22.

Krueger

R. A.

Casey

M. A.

(2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). SAGE.

23.

McMillan

J. H.

(2008). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer (5th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.

24.

MoNE . (2019). Öğrenci tanılama ve yerleştirme kılavuzu 2019-2020 [Student identification and placement guide 2019-2020]. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education]. https://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_11/15173608_TanYlama_KYlavuzu__YeYitek_Ekli_2.pdf.

25.

MoNE . (2020, April 25). “Özel” çocuklara özel ilgi gösteren mobil uygulama [Mobile application that pays special attention to special children. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education]. https://www.meb.gov.tr/ozel-cocuklara-ozel-ilgi-gosteren-mobil-uygulama/haber/20785/tr.

26.

Mulrine

C. F.

(2007). Creating a virtual learning environment for gifted and talented learners. Gifted Child Today, 30(2), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2007-30.

27.

Periathiruvadi

Rinn

A. N.

(2012). Technology in gifted education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2012.10782601.

28.

Petersen

J. S.

(2019). Presenting a qualitative study: A reviewer’s perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(3), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219844789.

29.

Potts

J. A.

(2019). Profoundly gifted students’ perceptions of virtual classrooms. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986218801075.

30.

Potts

J. A.

Potts

(2017). Is your gifted child ready for online learning? Gifted Child Today, 40(4), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217517722182.

31.

Rahimi

Soleymani

(2015). The impact of mobile learning on listening anxiety and listening comprehension. English Language Teaching, 8(10), 152–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n10p152.

32.

Read

Kukulska-Hulme

(2015). The role of a mobile app for listening comprehension training in distance learning to sustain student motivation. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 21(10), 1327–1338. https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-021-10-1327.

33.

Sak

Ayas

Bal-Sezerel

Özdemir

N. N.

Öpengin

Demirel

Ş.

(2019). Development of gifted education in Turkey. In B

Wallace

D A

Sisk

Senior

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of gifted and talented (pp. 492–507). Sage.

34.

Siegle

(2019). Seeing is believing: Using virtual and augmented reality to enhance student learning. Gifted Child Today, 42(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217518804854.

35.

Steenbergen-Hu

Olszewski-Kubilius

(2017). Factors that contributed to gifted students’ success on STEM pathways: The role of race, personal interests, and aspects of high school experience. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(2), 99–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217701022.

36.

Swan

Coulombe-Quach

Huang

Godek

Becker

Zhou

(2015). Meeting the needs of gifted and talented students: Case study of a virtual learning lab in a rural middle school. Journal of Advanced Academics, 26(4), 294–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X15603366.

37.

Tan

(In Press) Providing equity in gifted education in a single-state country. Gifted Child Quarterly, Special Issue Commentary.

38.

Thomas

D. R.

(2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748.

39.

Thomson

D. L.

(2010). Beyond the classroom walls: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives on how online learning can meet the needs of gifted students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(4), 662–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1002100405.

40.

Tomlinson

C. A.

Jarvis

J. M.

(2009). Differentiation: Making curriculum work for all students through responsive planning & instruction. In J S

Renzulli

E J

Gubbins

K S

McMillen

R D

Eckert

C A

Little

(Eds.), Systems & models for developing programs for the gifted & talented (2nd ed., pp. 599–628). Creative Learning Press.

41.

Turkish Statistical Institute . (2020). Number of the poor and poverty rate by household type and equivalised household disposable income, 2006-2020. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/DownloadIstatistikselTablo?p=VI2KH/M7SjytMLHXsiv3wepROxK5hSMpRgGBcIzexrUGDQzjtSNZPhOL7pWNPjMR.

42.

Türksoy

Karabulut

(2020). Gifted students’ perceptions of distance education in the COVID-19 epidemy. Talent, 10(2), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.46893/talent.773442.

43.

Vidal

(2020). Education continuity during the coronovirus crisis: Turkey. Özelim eğitimdeyim (I am special, I am in education). OECD. https://oecdedutoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Turkey-I-am-special-I-am-in-education.pdf.

44.

Vogl

Preckel

(2014). Full-time ability grouping of gifted students: Impacts on social self-concept and school-related attitudes. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213513795.

45.

WHO . (2020, March 11). WHO director-general’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020 https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020.

46.

Zydney

J. M.

Warner

(2016) Mobile apps for science learning: Review of research. Computers & Education 94: 1–17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.001.