Using the SAT-M to identify the mathematically talented in Singapore

Abstract

Experiences by the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY) at Johns Hopkins University indicated that the mathematical section of the College Board's Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT-M) is an excellent measure of mathematical ability for youths belowl3 years of age. In an attempt to search out the mathematically talented in Singapore, the SAT-M was administered to 2361 Secondary 1 students (equivalent to Grade 7) from 8 good schools. STEPWISE regression identified performance in primary level Mathematics as the major predictor of the SAT-M. The other significant predictors were stream, primary level English grade, gender and language spoken at home. Seven boys and a girl scored above a standard score of 700M (proportion of 1:4600 in the Secondary 1 cohort). These students were interviewed to explore their family background, educational level of parents, interests and career aspirations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benbow

C. R

(1986). SMPY’s model for teaching mathematically precocious students In Renzulli

J.S.

(Ed.) Systems and Models for Developing Programs for the Gifted and Talented, Mansfield Centre, Connecticut: Creative Learning Press.

Benbow

C. R

(1992). Academic achievement in mathematics and science of students between ages 13 and 23: Are there differences among students in the top one percent of mathematical ability, Journal of Educational Psychology, 84,1, 51-61.

Benbow

C. R

& Stanley,

J. C.

(Eds.) (1983). Academic Precocity: Aspects of its development, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

Chinese youths ace the SAT-M (1987,February). Johns Hopkins Magazine, 39, 1, 10.

College Board (1987). National percentiles, college-bound seniors, based on scores in College-Bound Senior, 1986–87, New York: College Board.

Kleinbaum

D. G.

& Kupper,

L. L.

(1978 ). Applied Regression Analysis and other Multivariable Methods, Boston, MA: Duxbury.

Lubinski

& Benbow,

C. R

(1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted: Implications for the maths- science pipeline, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 2, 61 - 66.

Lupkowski

& Stanley,

J. C.

(1988). Comparing Asians and non-Asians who reason extremely well mathematically, Paper presented at the Cornell Symposium on Asian Americans: Asian Americans and Higher Education.

Ministry of Education (1986). Education in Singapore, Singapore: Ministry of Education, Public Relations Unit.

10.

Moore

S. D.

& Stanley,

J. C.

(1988). Family background of young Asian Americans who reason extremely well mathematically, Journal of the Illinois Council for the Gifted, 7, 11-14.

11.

Riordan

(1990). Girls and Boys in School: Together or Separate, New York: Teachers College.

12.

SAS Institute Inc. , (1985). SAS User’s Guide: Statistics (Version 5), Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

13.

Singapore (1991). Singapore: The Next Lap. Singapore: Times.

14.

Stanley

J. C.

(1986a). Fostering the use of mathematical talent in the USA: SMPY’s rationale, Journal of the Illinois Council for the Gifted, 5, 18-25.

15.

Stanley

J. C.

(1986b). SAT-M scores of highly selected students in Shanghai tested when less than 13 years old, The College Board Review, 140, 10 - 13, 28.

16.

Stanley

J. C.

(1987). Mathematical Aptitude in China, Gifted Child Quarterly, 10, 4,11.

17.

Stanley

J. C.

(1988). Some characteristics of SMPY’s “700-800 on SAT-M before age 13 group”: Youths who reason extremely well mathematically, Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 1, 205 - 209.

18.

Stanley

J. C.

& Benbow,

C. P

(1986). Youths who reason extremely well, In Sternberg

R. J.

& Davidson

J. E.

(Eds.) Conceptions of Giftedness, New York: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Stanley

J. C.

, Huang

J. F

& Zu,

X. M.

(1986). SAT-M scores of highly selected students in Shanghai tested when less than 13 years old, The College Board Review, 140, 10 - 13, 28.

20.

Stanley

J. C.

, Feng

C. D.

& Zhu,

X. M.

(1989). Chinese youths who reason extremely well mathematically, Network News and Views, 8, 33 - 39.

21.

ST Schools 100, the Straits Times Guide to secondary schools (1992, August). The Straits Times, Singapore, p1.

22.

Zak

P M.

, Benbow

C. P

& Stanley,

J. C.

(1983) Several factors associated with success as an undergraduate chemistry major, College and University 58, 3, 303 - 312.