The locus of control construct and its importance in allowing gifted and talented students to reach their maximum potential is discussed. This article suggests that an understanding of gifted and talented students’ perceptions of responsibility for behaviour aids in understanding their learning processes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrodyLE, and BenbowC.R (1986). Social and emotional adjustment of adolescents extremely talented in verbal or mathematical reasoning.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 15,1–18.
2.
ClarkB. (1983). Growing up gifted. Ohio: Merrill.
3.
ChiangG.C. (1991). Student ratings of teachers, teacher psychological type, and teacher classroom behavior: An exploratory study in gifted education. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 2001-A.
4.
CreekR.J. (1991). Intemality and achievement in the intermediate grades. Research Report: Pennsylvania (10pp).
5.
DukeM. R, and NowickiS.Jr. (1973). Personality correlates of the Nowicki-Strickland Locus of Control Scale for adults.Psychological Reports, 33, 267–270.
6.
EngelbergR.A., and EvansE.D. (1986). Perceptions and attitudes about school grading practices among intellectually gifted, learning disabled, and normal elementary school pupils.Journal of Special Education, 20, 91–101.
7.
ErikssonG.I. (1990). Choice and perception of control: The effect of a thinking skills program on the locus of control, self- concept and creativity of gifted students. Gifted Education International, 6, 135–142.
8.
FranksB., and DolanL (1982). Affective characteristics of gifted children: Educational implications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 172–178.
9.
HartyH., AdkinsD.M., and HungateE.W. (1984). Exploring self-concept and locus of control of students in two recognized approaches to elementary school gifted education. Roeper Review, 7, 88–91.
10.
HieronymusA.N., LindquistE. F, and HooverH.D. (1979). Teachers guide: Iowa tests of basic skills elementary battery. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
11.
KanoyR.C., JohnsonB.W., and KanoyK.W. (1980). Locus of control and self-concept in achieving and underachieving bright elementary students.Psychology in the Schools, 17, 395–399.
12.
KnightB.A. (1991). The development and implementation of a teaching perspective designed to modify intellectually disabled students9 external locus of control. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of New England.
13.
LaffoonK.S. (1989). Causal attributions of underachieving gifted, achieving gifted, and non-gifted students.Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 4–21.
14.
LefcourtH.M. (1982). Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
15.
LumM.S. (1988). Gifted population and adjustment A literature review of giftedness on conduct, family adjustment, emotional functioning, social functioning and perceived competence. Biola University Research Paper (33pp).
16.
RimmS.B. (1987). Why bright children underachieve.Indiana State Department of Education. (15pp).
17.
RogersK.B. (1986). Do the gifted think and learn differently?: A review of recent research and its implications for instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Council for Exceptional Children, New Orleans (49pp).
18.
RotterJ.B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.
19.
RotterJ.B. (1990). Internal versus external control of reinforcement. American Psychologist, 45, 489–493.
StipekD., and WeiszJ. (1981). Perceived personal control and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 51, 101–137.
23.
StockdaleD. F, GalejsL, and WolinsL (1983). Cooperative- competitive preferences and behavioral correlates as a function of sex and age of school-age children. Psychological Reports, 5, 739–750.
24.
TidwellR. (1981). A psychoeducational profile of gifted minority group students identified without reliance on aptitude tests. Journal of Non-White Concerns in Personal and Guidance, 9, 77–86.b,V
25.
WangM.C. (1983). Development and consequences of students’ sense of personal control. In LevineJ. and WangM.C. (Eds), Teacher and student perceptions: Implications for learning (pp. 213–247). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
