This study explored the relationship between verbal and nonverbal intelligence scores in students from low-income households. Researchers investigated how the verbal and nonverbal scores of these students differed both by ability level and within each grade. The Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scale was administered to 1935 kindergarten through fifth-grade students enrolled in free and reduced-price lunch programs. Large gaps were found between students’ verbal and nonverbal intelligence scores; such gaps were not specific to any particular grade or ability level but rather were seen in all of the examined grades. Gaps were even larger for students with higher nonverbal IQ scores. Results suggest that assessments based solely on nonverbal scores should be interpreted with caution.
AguirreN (2003) ESL students in gifted education. In: CastellanoJA (ed) Special Populations in Gifted Education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 17–27.
2.
BaerNA (1980) Programs for the gifted: a present or a paradox?Phi Delta Kappan61: 621–623.
3.
BarkanJHBernalEM (1991) Gifted education for bilingual and limited English proficient students. Gifted Child Quarterly35(3): 144–147. DOI: 10.1177/001698629103500306.
4.
BenbowCPStankeyJC (1996) Inequity in equity: how “equity” can lead to inequity for high-potential students. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law2(2): 249–292. DOI: 10.1037//1076-8971.2.2.249.
5.
BlairC (2006) How similar are fluid cognition and general intelligence? A developmental neuroscience perspective on fluid cognition as an aspect of human cognitive ability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences29: 109–160. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X06009034.
BornsteinMHBradleyRH (2003) Socioeconomic Status, Parenting, and Child Development. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
BradenJP (2000) Perspectives on the nonverbal assessment of intelligence. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment18: 204–210. DOI: 10.1177/073428290001800301.
9.
CallahanCM (2001) Fourth down and inches. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education12: 148–156.
10.
CarmanCATaylorDK (2010) Socioeconomic status effects on using the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT) to identify the gifted/talented. Gifted Child Quarterly54: 75–84. DOI: 10.1177/0016986209355976.
11.
CattellRB (1971) Abilities: Their Structure, Growth, and Action. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
12.
CattellRBHornJL (1978) A check on the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence with description of new subtest designs. Journal of Educational Measurement15: 139–164. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1978.tb00065.x.
13.
CohenJ (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin112: 155–159. DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
14.
CumminsJ (1979) Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research49(2): 222–251. DOI: 10.2307/1169960.
15.
DombrowskiSCWatkinsMWBroganMJ (2009) An exploratory investigation of the factor structure of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment27: 494–507.
16.
DuncanGJYeungWJBrooks-GunnJ. (1998) How much does childhood poverty affect the life chances of children?American Sociological Review63: 406–423. DOI: 10.2307/2657556.
17.
FlanaganDPAndrewsTJGenshaftJL (1997) The functional utility of intelligence tests with special education populations. In: FlanaganDPGenshaftJLHarrisonPL (eds) Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues. New York: Guilford, pp. 457–483.
18.
FriedmanH (1968) Magnitude of experimental effect and a table for its rapid estimation. Psychological Bulletin70: 245–251. DOI: 10.1037/h0026258.
19.
GoddardRDSalloumSJBerebitskyD (2009) Trust as a mediator of the relationships between poverty, racial composition, and academic achievement: evidence from Michigan’s public elementary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly45(2): 292–311.
20.
GustafssonJEUndheimJO (1996) Individual differences in cognitive functions. In: BerlinerDCCalfeeRC (eds) Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan, pp. 186–242.
21.
HornJL (1980) Concepts of intellect in relation to learning and adult development. Intelligence4: 285–317. DOI: 10.1016/0160-2896(80)90025-2.
22.
HornJLCattellRB (1966) Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized general intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology57: 253–270. DOI: 10.1037/h0023816.
23.
JensenAR (1998) The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability. Westport: Praeger.
24.
JonesBAGansleKA (2010) The effects of a mini-conference, socioeconomic status, and parent education on perceived and actual parent participation in individual education program meetings. Research in the Schools17: 23–38.
25.
JuntuneJKayaFRamosS (2011) Another look at high ability students from low SES populations. Tempo32(4): 14–19.
26.
KvistAVGustafssonJ (2008) The relation between fluid intelligence and the general factor as a function of cultural background: a test of Cattell’s investment theory. Intelligence36: 422–436.
27.
LakinJM (2012) Assessing the cognitive abilities of culturally and linguistically diverse students: predictive validity of verbal, quantitative, and nonverbal tests. Psychology in the Schools49(8): 756–768.
28.
LakinJMLohmanDF (2011) The predictive accuracy of verbal, quantitative, and nonverbal reasoning tests: consequences for talent identification and program diversity. Journal for the Education of the Gifted34(4): 595–623. DOI: 10.1177/016235321103400404.
29.
LewisJDDeCamp-FritsonSSRamageJC. (2007) Selecting for ethnically diverse children who may be gifted using Raven’s standard progressive matrices and Naglieri nonverbal abilities test. Multicultural Education15(1): 38–42.
30.
LohmanDF (2005) The role of nonverbal ability tests in identifying academically gifted students: an aptitude perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly49: 111–138. DOI: 10.1177/001698620504900203.
31.
LohmanDFGambrellJL (2012) Using nonverbal tests to help identify academically talented children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment30(1): 25–44. DOI: 10.1177/0734282911428194.
32.
LohmanDFKorbKLakinJ (2008) Identifying academically gifted English language learners using nonverbal tests: a comparison of the Raven, NNAT, and CogAT. Gifted Child Quarterly52: 275–296.
33.
McCallumRSBrackenBAWassermanJD (2001) Essentials of Nonverbal Assessment. Hoboken: Wiley.
34.
McGrewKS (2009) CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence37: 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004.
35.
McGrewKSEvansJJ (2004) Internal and External Factorial Extensions to the Cattell–Horn–Carroll (CHC) Theory of Cognitive Abilities: A Review of Factor Analytic Research Since Carroll’s Seminal 1993 Treatises. St. Cloud: Institute for Applied Psychometrics.
36.
NelsonJMCanivezGLLindstromW. (2007) Higher-order exploratory factor analysis of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales with a referred sample. Journal of School Psychology45: 439–456.
37.
Olszewski-KubiliusPLThomsonDL (2010) Gifted programming for poor or minority urban students: issues and lessons learned. Gifted Child Today33(4): 58–64.
38.
PowersSBarkanJH (1986) Concurrent validity of the Standard Progressive Matrices for Hispanic and non-Hispanic seventh-grade students. Psychology in the Schools23: 333–336.
39.
RenzulliJS (1982) Myth: the gifted constitute 3-5% of the population. Gifted Child Quarterly26: 11–14.
40.
ReynoldsCRKamphausRW (2003) Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales and the Reynolds Intellectual Screening Test Professional Manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.
41.
RindermannHFlores-MendozaCMansur-AlvesM (2010) Reciprocal effects between fluid and crystallized intelligence and their dependence on parents’ socioeconomic status and education. Learning and Individual Differences20: 544–548.
42.
SaccuzzoDPJohnsonNERussellG (1992). Verbal versus performance IQs for gifted African-American, Caucasian, Filipino, and Hispanic children. Psychological Assessment4: 239–244. DOI: 10.1037//1040-3590.4.2.239.
43.
SkibaRJPoloni-StaudingerLSimmonsAB. (2005) Unproven links: can poverty explain ethnic disproportionality in special education?The Journal of Special Education39: 130–144.
44.
Tyler-WoodTCarriL (1993) Verbal measures of cognitive ability: the gifted low SES student’s albatross. Roeper Review16(2): 102–105. DOI: 10.1080/02783199309553550.
45.
WarneRT (2009) Comparing tests used to identify ethnically diverse gifted children: a critical response to Lewis, DeCamp-Fritson, Ramage, McFarland, and Archwamety. Multicultural Education17(1): 48–53.
46.
WarneRTAndersonBJohnsonAO (2013) The impact of race and ethnicity on the identification process for giftedness in Utah. Journal for the Education of the Gifted36(4): 487–508. DOI: 10.1177/062353213506065.
47.
WatkinsMWLeiPCanivezGL (2007) Psychometric intelligence and achievement: a cross–lagged panel analysis. Intelligence35: 59–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2006.04.005.
48.
WillisJODumontRKaufmanAS (2011) Factor–analytic models of intelligence. In: SternbergRJKaufmanSB (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 39–57.
